NCT06171633

Brief Summary

The study targets three aims: Aim 1: focuses on PIs' and mentors' confidence in their ability to intervene on sexual harassment and their attitudes, perceptions, and knowledge (APK) about sexual harassment, civility, microaggressions, and unconscious bias. Aim 2: focuses on trainees' experiences of sexual harassment and microaggressions and civility, sense of belonging, well-being, productivity, and persistence in a research career. Aim 3: focuses on the culture and climate of the research learning environment.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
2,160

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
13mo left

Started Mar 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress67%
Mar 2024Jun 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 6, 2023

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 14, 2023

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 6, 2024

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2027

Last Updated

May 29, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

December 6, 2023

Last Update Submit

May 27, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Sexual Harassment PreventionEducational Online TrainingVideo Game ElementsUpstanding

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Confidence to Intervene on Sexual Harassment Scale Score

    Participants are asked to rate: "How confident are you in your ability to intervene when you hear about or witness sexual harassment?" Score range: 1 (not at all confident) to 5 (extremely confident).

    Survey at baseline, immediately post-intervention (9 months after baseline), and 1 year after the completion of the 9-month intervention

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Persistence in research careers

    baseline, immediately post-intervention (9 months after baseline), and 1 year after completion of the 9-month intervention.

  • Experiences of sexual harassment as measured by the short Sexual Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ-DoDs)

    baseline, immediately post-intervention (9 months after baseline), and 1 year after completion of the 9-month intervention.

Study Arms (4)

Intervention Group / year 1

EXPERIMENTAL

Beginning in year 1, participants access online video modules through an online learning platform for up to 9 months.

Behavioral: E-STOP online educational program (treatment condition)

Control Condition Group / year 1

EXPERIMENTAL

Beginning in year 1, participants access online video modules through an online learning platform for up to 9 months.

Behavioral: E-STOP online educational program (control condition)

Intervention Group / year 2

EXPERIMENTAL

Beginning in year 2, participants access online video modules through an online learning platform for up to 9 months.

Behavioral: E-STOP online educational program (treatment condition)

Control Condition Group / year 2

EXPERIMENTAL

Beginning in year 2, participants access online video modules through an online learning platform for up to 9 months.

Behavioral: E-STOP online educational program (control condition)

Interventions

Participants access online video modules through an online learning platform. Program includes modules on civility and upstander interventions and education about sexual harassment, microaggressions, and implicit bias.

Intervention Group / year 1Intervention Group / year 2

Participants access online video modules through an online learning platform. Program includes authorship ethics only.

Control Condition Group / year 1Control Condition Group / year 2

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • PIs, Mentors and Trainees of T-32 Programs

You may not qualify if:

  • People who are not PIs, Mentors and Trainees of T-32 Programs

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Stanford University

Stanford, California, 94305, United States

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Torres MB, Salles A, Cochran A. Recognizing and Reacting to Microaggressions in Medicine and Surgery. JAMA Surg. 2019 Sep 1;154(9):868-872. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1648.

    PMID: 31290954BACKGROUND
  • Montanaro E, Fiellin LE, Fakhouri T, Kyriakides TC, Duncan LR. Using Videogame Apps to Assess Gains in Adolescents' Substance Use Knowledge: New Opportunities for Evaluating Intervention Exposure and Content Mastery. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Oct 28;17(10):e245. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4377.

    PMID: 26510775BACKGROUND
  • Sompayrac L, Danna KJ. An SV40 mutant oncoprotein has a nuclear location. Virology. 1989 Jul;171(1):267-70. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(89)90536-9.

    PMID: 2741344BACKGROUND
  • Salles A, Mueller CM, Cohen GL. Exploring the Relationship Between Stereotype Perception and Residents' Well-Being. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jan;222(1):52-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 21.

    PMID: 26616033BACKGROUND
  • Fiellin LE, Hieftje KD, Pendergrass TM, Kyriakides TC, Duncan LR, Dziura JD, Sawyer BG, Mayes L, Crusto CA, Forsyth BW, Fiellin DA. Video Game Intervention for Sexual Risk Reduction in Minority Adolescents: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Sep 18;19(9):e314. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8148.

    PMID: 28923788BACKGROUND
  • Mueller AS, Jenkins TM, Osborne M, Dayal A, O'Connor DM, Arora VM. Gender Differences in Attending Physicians' Feedback to Residents: A Qualitative Analysis. J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Oct;9(5):577-585. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-17-00126.1.

    PMID: 29075375BACKGROUND
  • Tenbrunsel AE, Rees MR, Diekmann KA. Sexual Harassment in Academia: Ethical Climates and Bounded Ethicality. Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:245-270. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102945. Epub 2018 Aug 29.

    PMID: 30156976BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Sexual Harassment

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Sexual BehaviorBehaviorSocial Behavior

Study Officials

  • Arghavan Salles

    arghavan@stanford.edu

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2023

First Posted

December 14, 2023

Study Start

March 6, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Last Updated

May 29, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations