Action Observation and Motor Imagery Therapy in Stroke
Effect of Action Observation and Motor Imagery Therapy on Balance, Functional Status and Quality of Life in Stroke, Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
56
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In recent years, motor imagery (MI) and action observation (AO) therapy strategies have been used in rehabilitation programs to increase motor learning in stroke. Visuomotor training strategies such as AO and MI therapy rely on the activity of the mirror neuron system to facilitate motor re-learning. Mirror neurons are activated during the performance of goal-directed actions, also when observing the same action and visualizing the action in the mind. This clinical trial aims to test whether the application of AO and MI treatment in stroke in addition to conventional rehabilitation programs has an additional effect on motor recovery, activities of daily living, and quality of life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke
Started Dec 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 4, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 12, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 12, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2026
December 11, 2025
December 1, 2025
2.5 years
December 4, 2023
December 4, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
The difference in the scores of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment between pre- and post-rehabilitation assessments
Univariate statistical analyses will be performed to calculate differences in the scores of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment between pre- and post-rehabilitation assessments. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment is a stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index. It is designed to assess motor functioning, balance, sensation and joint functioning in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia. The motor domain is used in this study, which includes items assessing movement, coordination, and reflex action of the upper and lower extremities. Motor score ranges from 0 (hemiplegia) to 100 points (normal motor performance). Divided into 66 points for upper extremity and 34 points for the lower extremity.
6 weeks
The difference in the scores of the Brunnstrom stages between pre- and post-rehabilitation assessments
Univariate statistical analyses will be performed to calculate differences in the scores of the Brunnstron stages between pre- and post-rehabilitation assessments. Brunnstrom staging assesses the motor recovery process of the hemiplegic patient in 6 stages (Stages 1 to 6). Upper extremity, lower extremity, and hand are evaluated separately. Higher stages indicate better motor function.
6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
The difference in the scores of the Barthel Index between pre- and post-rehabilitation assessments
6 weeks
The difference in the scores of the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale between pre- and post-rehabilitation
6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Action observation and motor imagery therapy for rehabilitation
EXPERIMENTALAction observation and motor imagery therapy for rehabilitation in stroke patients in addition to conventional rehabilitation programs.
Sham action observation and motor imagery therapy for rehabilitation
SHAM COMPARATORSham comparator for action observation and motor imagery therapy for rehabilitation in stroke patients in addition to conventional rehabilitation programs.
Interventions
Action observation; Patients will watch some exercises accompanied by music from a previously prepared video for 10 minutes. Exercises include 8-10 repetitions of abduction-adduction, horizontal abduction-adduction, flexion-extension and supination-pronation movements for the upper extremity, and stepping, forward-backward stepping, side stepping and ankle dorsiflexion movements for the lower extremity. Motor imagery training; Patients will be asked to visualize the actions they watched in their minds for 10 minutes. Then the patients will watch the video again and will be asked to perform the exercises while watching.
Sham action observation; Patients will watch a video consisting of static nature photographs for 10 minutes with the same music. Sham motor imaginary; Patients will think about the video they watched for 10 minutes. Then, they will watch another video in which the exercises are performed only once, and they will be asked to do the exercises. They will be given enough time to do 8-10 repetitions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who had a stroke in the last year
- Functional Ambulation Classification score 2-5
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have had repeated strokes
- Patients with neglect
- Patients with cognitive dysfunction (those who cannot follow simple verbal instructions)
- Patients with severe hearing problems
- Patients with severe vision problems
- Patients with additional musculoskeletal system pathology that will affect physical performance (such as amputation, severe joint mobility limitation, peripheral nerve damage)
- Patients with uncontrolled hypertension and diabetes mellitus
- Patients with a history of symptomatic lung disease (such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema)
- Patients with a history of symptomatic cardiac disease (such as coronary artery disease, arrhythmia, heart failure)
- Patients with peripheral artery disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Karaman Training and Research Hospital
Karaman, Karaman, 70200, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yurdagul Bahran Mustu, MD.
Karaman Training and Research Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Single
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D., Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 4, 2023
First Posted
December 12, 2023
Study Start
December 12, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Last Updated
December 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12