NCT06152952

Brief Summary

This prospective clinical trial aims to compare the perioperative outcomes of rhomboid flap versus deep suturing in the management of recurrent sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2023

Typical duration for all trials

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 12, 2023

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 1, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2023

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

December 5, 2023

Status Verified

December 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

November 12, 2023

Last Update Submit

December 1, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Rhomboid flapDeep suturing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Primary Outcome of comparing the perioperative of rhomboid flap versus deep suturing in the management of recurrent sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease.

    Primary Outcome : Postoperative recurrence rate. Recurrence will be defined as the additional outbreak of signs and symptoms of pilonidal disease after a disease-free interval following complete wound healing

    baseline

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Secondary Outcome (subsidiary)of comparing the perioperative of rhomboid flap versus deep suturing in the management of recurrent sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease.

    baseline

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Data management and analysis (Details needed):

    baseline

Study Arms (2)

Group 1 : The rhomboid flap Approach

The flap will be dissected deep to the gluteal fascia (subfascial level) so as to raise thick a fasciocutaneous flap. This will assure good vascularity of the flap without dead space. The rhomboid flap (CDEF) will be mobilized from the gluteal fascia and sutured without tension in three layers (gluteal fascia with 2/0 Vicryl, subcutaneous fat with 3/0 Vicryl, and the skin with 4/0 Prolene). As all sides will be equal in length, the flap fits in place without tension. A suction drain will be left behind and the wound will be dressed as usual. Pressure wound dressing will be applied and removed on the third postoperative day.

Procedure: The rhomboid flap approach

Group 2 : The deep suturing approach

A vertical elliptical incision encompassing all pilonidal pits will be made and excision of the sinus will be carried out down to the level of the sacrococcygeal fascia. Tension will be released by a limited sharp dissection above the fascia. After haemostasis is ensured using electrocautery, a suction drain will be inserted through a separate incision, then the deep fascia will be approximated and the wound will be closed in layers using polyglactin 0 sutures. Finally, the skin will be closed with 2/0 polypropylene interrupted mattress sutures.

Procedure: The rhomboid flap approach

Interventions

The rhomboid flap Approach : The flap will be dissected deep to the gluteal fascia (subfascial level) so as to raise thick a fasciocutaneous flap. This will assure good vascularity of the flap without dead space. The rhomboid flap (CDEF) will be mobilized from the gluteal fascia and sutured without tension in three layers The deep suturing approach : A vertical elliptical incision encompassing all pilonidal pits will be made and excision of the sinus will be carried out down to the level of the sacrococcygeal fascia. T then the deep fascia will be approximated and the wound will be closed

Also known as: The deep suturing approach
Group 1 : The rhomboid flap ApproachGroup 2 : The deep suturing approach

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Diversity in population, some come from a rural environment and others from the city

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients aged between 18 and 60 years;
  • Patients with one or two small inactive sinuses will be included for easier excisional procedures;
  • Previous intervention for pilonidal disease whether surgical or non-surgical;

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with an acute abscess. 2- Patients with mall inactive pilonidal sinus disease. 3- Age beyond the previous limits. 4- Patients with primary pilonidal disease. 5- Refusal to participate in the study. 6- Unfit for anaesthesia and surgery. 7- Patients with malignant neoplasms or inflammatory bowel disease.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (5)

  • Esposito C, Cerulo M, Esposito G, Turco A, Borgogni R, Carulli R, Di Mento C, Del Conte F, Coppola V, Escolino M. Endoscopic Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus Disease in Children: A Systematic Review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2023 May;33(5):512-517. doi: 10.1089/lap.2022.0564. Epub 2023 Apr 6.

    PMID: 37023403BACKGROUND
  • Konoplitskyi V, Shavliuk R, Dmytriiev D, Dmytriiev K, Kyrychenko O, Zaletskyi B, Olkhomiak O. Pilonidal disease: changes in understanding of etiology, pathogenesis and approach to treatment. Wiad Lek. 2019 Aug 31;72(8):1559-1565.

    PMID: 32012508BACKGROUND
  • Harries RL, Alqallaf A, Torkington J, Harding KG. Management of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease. Int Wound J. 2019 Apr;16(2):370-378. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13042. Epub 2018 Nov 15.

    PMID: 30440104BACKGROUND
  • Grabowski J, Oyetunji TA, Goldin AB, Baird R, Gosain A, Lal DR, Kawaguchi A, Downard C, Sola JE, Arthur LG, Shelton J, Diefenbach KA, Kelley-Quon LI, Williams RF, Ricca RL, Dasgupta R, St Peter SD, Somme S, Guner YS, Jancelewicz T. The management of pilonidal disease: A systematic review. J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Nov;54(11):2210-2221. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.02.055. Epub 2019 Mar 19.

    PMID: 30948198BACKGROUND
  • de Parades V, Bouchard D, Janier M, Berger A. Pilonidal sinus disease. J Visc Surg. 2013 Sep;150(4):237-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2013.05.006. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

    PMID: 23911903BACKGROUND

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
1 Year
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 12, 2023

First Posted

December 1, 2023

Study Start

December 1, 2023

Primary Completion

January 1, 2026

Study Completion

January 1, 2026

Last Updated

December 5, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-12