Rhomboid Flap vs. Deep Suturing in Recurrent Pilonidal Sinus
Evaluation of Rhomboid Flap Outcome in the Surgical Treatment of Recurrent Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus vs. Deep Suturing
1 other identifier
observational
30
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This prospective clinical trial aims to compare the perioperative outcomes of rhomboid flap versus deep suturing in the management of recurrent sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Dec 2023
Typical duration for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 12, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2026
CompletedDecember 5, 2023
December 1, 2023
2.1 years
November 12, 2023
December 1, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Primary Outcome of comparing the perioperative of rhomboid flap versus deep suturing in the management of recurrent sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease.
Primary Outcome : Postoperative recurrence rate. Recurrence will be defined as the additional outbreak of signs and symptoms of pilonidal disease after a disease-free interval following complete wound healing
baseline
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Secondary Outcome (subsidiary)of comparing the perioperative of rhomboid flap versus deep suturing in the management of recurrent sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease.
baseline
Other Outcomes (1)
Data management and analysis (Details needed):
baseline
Study Arms (2)
Group 1 : The rhomboid flap Approach
The flap will be dissected deep to the gluteal fascia (subfascial level) so as to raise thick a fasciocutaneous flap. This will assure good vascularity of the flap without dead space. The rhomboid flap (CDEF) will be mobilized from the gluteal fascia and sutured without tension in three layers (gluteal fascia with 2/0 Vicryl, subcutaneous fat with 3/0 Vicryl, and the skin with 4/0 Prolene). As all sides will be equal in length, the flap fits in place without tension. A suction drain will be left behind and the wound will be dressed as usual. Pressure wound dressing will be applied and removed on the third postoperative day.
Group 2 : The deep suturing approach
A vertical elliptical incision encompassing all pilonidal pits will be made and excision of the sinus will be carried out down to the level of the sacrococcygeal fascia. Tension will be released by a limited sharp dissection above the fascia. After haemostasis is ensured using electrocautery, a suction drain will be inserted through a separate incision, then the deep fascia will be approximated and the wound will be closed in layers using polyglactin 0 sutures. Finally, the skin will be closed with 2/0 polypropylene interrupted mattress sutures.
Interventions
The rhomboid flap Approach : The flap will be dissected deep to the gluteal fascia (subfascial level) so as to raise thick a fasciocutaneous flap. This will assure good vascularity of the flap without dead space. The rhomboid flap (CDEF) will be mobilized from the gluteal fascia and sutured without tension in three layers The deep suturing approach : A vertical elliptical incision encompassing all pilonidal pits will be made and excision of the sinus will be carried out down to the level of the sacrococcygeal fascia. T then the deep fascia will be approximated and the wound will be closed
Eligibility Criteria
Diversity in population, some come from a rural environment and others from the city
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients aged between 18 and 60 years;
- Patients with one or two small inactive sinuses will be included for easier excisional procedures;
- Previous intervention for pilonidal disease whether surgical or non-surgical;
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with an acute abscess. 2- Patients with mall inactive pilonidal sinus disease. 3- Age beyond the previous limits. 4- Patients with primary pilonidal disease. 5- Refusal to participate in the study. 6- Unfit for anaesthesia and surgery. 7- Patients with malignant neoplasms or inflammatory bowel disease.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (5)
Esposito C, Cerulo M, Esposito G, Turco A, Borgogni R, Carulli R, Di Mento C, Del Conte F, Coppola V, Escolino M. Endoscopic Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus Disease in Children: A Systematic Review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2023 May;33(5):512-517. doi: 10.1089/lap.2022.0564. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
PMID: 37023403BACKGROUNDKonoplitskyi V, Shavliuk R, Dmytriiev D, Dmytriiev K, Kyrychenko O, Zaletskyi B, Olkhomiak O. Pilonidal disease: changes in understanding of etiology, pathogenesis and approach to treatment. Wiad Lek. 2019 Aug 31;72(8):1559-1565.
PMID: 32012508BACKGROUNDHarries RL, Alqallaf A, Torkington J, Harding KG. Management of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease. Int Wound J. 2019 Apr;16(2):370-378. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13042. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
PMID: 30440104BACKGROUNDGrabowski J, Oyetunji TA, Goldin AB, Baird R, Gosain A, Lal DR, Kawaguchi A, Downard C, Sola JE, Arthur LG, Shelton J, Diefenbach KA, Kelley-Quon LI, Williams RF, Ricca RL, Dasgupta R, St Peter SD, Somme S, Guner YS, Jancelewicz T. The management of pilonidal disease: A systematic review. J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Nov;54(11):2210-2221. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.02.055. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
PMID: 30948198BACKGROUNDde Parades V, Bouchard D, Janier M, Berger A. Pilonidal sinus disease. J Visc Surg. 2013 Sep;150(4):237-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2013.05.006. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
PMID: 23911903BACKGROUND
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 1 Year
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 12, 2023
First Posted
December 1, 2023
Study Start
December 1, 2023
Primary Completion
January 1, 2026
Study Completion
January 1, 2026
Last Updated
December 5, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-12