De-roofing and Curettage vs WLE for Pilonidal Abscess
De-roofing and Curettage Versus Wide Local Excision for the Treatment of Acute Pilonidal Abscess: A Randomised Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
138
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Pilonidal disease refers to a common disease affecting mostly young males. It may present as asymptomatic pits, acute and painful abscess formation, or chronic discharging sinuses. There are many treatment options for the latter two manifestations but broadly speaking the surgical treatment of acute pilonidal abscess can fall into three categories: (1) incision and drainage, (2) de-roofing and curettage and (3) wide local excision. The evidence available for the surgical management of acute pilonidal abscess is limited. Previous studies have consistently demonstrated that incision and drainage results in high recurrence rates and should not be considered as the first-line treatment option for the management of acute pilonidal abscess. However, it is not clear whether abscess de-roofing with curettage or wide local excision should be considered as the surgical procedure of choice in acute pilonidal abscess. There has not been a prospective randomised study comparing abscess de-roofing with curettage and wide local excision for acute pilonidal abscess. The ideal surgical procedure would be one that results in the lowest rate of abscess recurrence, treats the underlying pilonidal sinus thereby reducing the need for re-operation but has acceptable post-operative pain, complications and time to complete wound healing.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2018
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 19, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2019
CompletedApril 19, 2018
January 1, 2018
1.5 years
January 19, 2018
April 18, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Recurrence of pilonidal abscess
During the follow up period the primary outcome measure will be if the patient develops a (recurrent) pilonidal abscess. This is a clinical diagnosis made by the clinician (General Practitioner or Hospital Doctor) attending to the patient. The definition for recurrent pilonidal abscess is any pilonidal abscess that occurs requiring either antibiotic (oral or intravenous) or surgical treatment. A small amount of discharge that settles on its own without the need for such treatment will not be counted as a recurrence.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Time to complete wound healing
4-10 weeks
Return to work
2-8 weeks
Procedural time
1 hour
Wound size at operation
1 hour
Wound size over time
4-10 weeks
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Abscess de-roofing and curettage
ACTIVE COMPARATORAbscess de-roofing and curettage. The patient will be placed in the lateral position with the buttocks spread apart using tape. The cleft of the buttocks will be shaved prior to cleaning and preparation of the skin. A spindle-shaped (elliptical) excision will be performed to the lateral aspect of the abscess formation with a scalpel staying away from the midline. Once the pus has been drained through this lateral incision the wound cavity will then be curetted and washed out with hydrogen peroxide. The wound size will be measured by the operating surgeon who will record the maximal length and width of the wound. Once haemostasis (cessation of any bleeding) is achieved the wound will be packed with Kaltostat ribbon and the wound dressed with blue gauze and mefix tape. The wound is therefore left open.
Abscess wide local excision
ACTIVE COMPARATORWide local excision. Patients will be placed in the prone position with the buttocks spread apart using tape. The cleft of the buttocks will be shaved prior to cleaning and preparation of the skin. Diluted methylene blue will be injected in all visible pits and a wide spindle-shaped (elliptical) midline excision of the skin and the underlying subcutaneous tissue down to the coccygeal (pre-sacral) fascia including all sinuses will be performed with electrocautery. The specimen will be sent for histology as per routine surgical practice. The wound will be washed with hydrogen peroxide. The wound size will be measured by the operating surgeon who will record the maximal length and width of the wound. Once haemostasis (cessation of any bleeding) is achieved the wound will be packed with Kaltostat ribbon and the wound dressed with blue gauze and mefix tape. The wound is therefore left open.
Interventions
Abscess de-roofing and curettage
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients with acute pilonidal abscess
You may not qualify if:
- Patients under the age of 16 years will be excluded.
- Immunocompromised (diabetes mellitus, taking oral steroids or immunosuppressive medication) patients will be excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (5)
Loganathan A, Arsalani Zadeh R, Hartley J. Pilonidal disease: time to reevaluate a common pain in the rear! Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Apr;55(4):491-3. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823fe06c. No abstract available.
PMID: 22426275BACKGROUNDHosseini SV, Bananzadeh AM, Rivaz M, Sabet B, Mosallae M, Pourahmad S, Yarmohammadi H. The comparison between drainage, delayed excision and primary closure with excision and secondary healing in management of pilonidal abscess. Int J Surg. 2006;4(4):228-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2005.12.005. Epub 2006 May 22.
PMID: 17462356BACKGROUNDVahedian J, Nabavizadeh F, Nakhaee N, Vahedian M, Sadeghpour A. Comparison between drainage and curettage in the treatment of acute pilonidal abscess. Saudi Med J. 2005 Apr;26(4):553-5.
PMID: 15900358BACKGROUNDEryilmaz R, Sahin M, Alimoglu O, Kaya B. [The comparison of incision and drainage with skin excision and curettage in the treatment of acute pilonidal abscess]. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2003 Apr;9(2):120-3. Turkish.
PMID: 12836108BACKGROUNDFahrni GT, Vuille-Dit-Bille RN, Leu S, Meuli M, Staerkle RF, Fink L, Dincler S, Muff BS. Five-year Follow-up and Recurrence Rates Following Surgery for Acute and Chronic Pilonidal Disease: A Survey of 421 Cases. Wounds. 2016 Jan;28(1):20-6.
PMID: 26824973BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lalin Navaratne, MBBS MRCS
LONDON NORTH WEST UNIVERSITY HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 19, 2018
First Posted
January 30, 2018
Study Start
May 1, 2018
Primary Completion
November 1, 2019
Study Completion
November 1, 2019
Last Updated
April 19, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-01