Effectiveness of Individual Physical Activity Programs to Prevent Sarcopenia and Frailty Among Older Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
360
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Sarcopenia and frailty could be prevented and rehabilitated through individual physical activities in the form of combined exercise that could be practiced at home in daily life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 26, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 29, 2023
CompletedNovember 29, 2023
November 1, 2023
12 months
September 26, 2023
November 26, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
The status of sarcopenia aligns with the criteria set by the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS).
Sarcopenia status was assessed through three aspects, including a muscle strength test using handgrip strength measured with a dynamometer, a physical performance test using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and an appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) test measured with the ACCUNIQ BC 380 tool based on bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). The results were aligned with the standards set by the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS). Sarcopenia was diagnosed by low ASM with low muscle strength or low physical performance, dynapenia was diagnosed by low muscle strength only, and pre-sarcopenia was diagnosed by low ASM or low physical performance. Participants underwent assessments both at the beginning and at the 30-week endpoint.
30 weeks
Muscle strength
Muscle strength, specifically handgrip strength, was measured using a hand-held dynamometer. Participants gripped the dynamometer with their dominant hand while standing, maintaining their upper arm close to the body and their elbow bent to 90 degrees, exerting maximum force. This test was conducted twice, and the superior result was recorded. Low muscle strength was diagnosed if the handgrip strength was \< 26 kilograms in males and \< 18 kilograms in females. Participants underwent assessments at both the beginning and the 30-week endpoint.
30 weeks
Physical performance
The physical performance test utilized the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) to evaluate physical function, with a maximum score of 12 points. Low physical performance was diagnosed if the SPPB score was ≤ 9. Participants underwent assessments at both the beginning and the 30-week endpoint.
30 weeks
Muscle mass
Appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) was measured using the ACCUNIQ BC 380 tool based on bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and the Skeletal Muscle Mass Index (SMI) was calculated by dividing ASM in kilograms by the height in meters squared. Low muscle mass is diagnosed if SMI is \< 7.0 kilograms/meter\^2 in men and \< 5.47 kg/m\^2 in women. Participants underwent assessments at both the beginning and the 30-week endpoint.
30 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Physical frailty status based on the 5 criteria of frailty phenotype, as defined by Fried et al. 2001.
30 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALThe Experimental groups or physical activity groups were assigned to three groups based on their muscle mass: normal, probable sarcopenia, and sarcopenia groups. The volunteers were provided with instructions on individual physical activities to be practiced at home for 30 weeks, 2-5 days per week and 50 minutes per session. These physical activities consisted of flexibility exercise for 10 minutes, aerobic exercise for 20 minutes, and resistance exercise for 20 minutes, as outlined in supplement 1. The volunteers were instructed on exercise techniques and physical activities by either sports scientists or registered nurses, and caregivers such as relatives or staff from the social club for older adults were allowed to be present during practice.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group did not receive any intervention apart from general suggestions and continued with their usual daily activities.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Individuals aged between 60 and 80 years.
- Those who are able to walk independently or with the aid of walking devices.
You may not qualify if:
- Participants with leg or foot amputations.
- Participants who had been admitted to hospitals in the past 6 months.
- Those with underlying medical conditions such as heart disease, bone and muscle injuries, and infectious diseases.
- Individuals who did not pass the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, Thailandlead
- Chulalongkorn Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Regional Health Promotion Center 2 Phitsanulok
Phitsanulok, 65000, Thailand
Related Publications (6)
Cadore EL, Casas-Herrero A, Zambom-Ferraresi F, Idoate F, Millor N, Gomez M, Rodriguez-Manas L, Izquierdo M. Multicomponent exercises including muscle power training enhance muscle mass, power output, and functional outcomes in institutionalized frail nonagenarians. Age (Dordr). 2014 Apr;36(2):773-85. doi: 10.1007/s11357-013-9586-z. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
PMID: 24030238BACKGROUNDCruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, Martin FC, Michel JP, Rolland Y, Schneider SM, Topinkova E, Vandewoude M, Zamboni M; European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing. 2010 Jul;39(4):412-23. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afq034. Epub 2010 Apr 13.
PMID: 20392703BACKGROUNDDent E, Morley JE, Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Arai H, Kritchevsky SB, Guralnik J, Bauer JM, Pahor M, Clark BC, Cesari M, Ruiz J, Sieber CC, Aubertin-Leheudre M, Waters DL, Visvanathan R, Landi F, Villareal DT, Fielding R, Won CW, Theou O, Martin FC, Dong B, Woo J, Flicker L, Ferrucci L, Merchant RA, Cao L, Cederholm T, Ribeiro SML, Rodriguez-Manas L, Anker SD, Lundy J, Gutierrez Robledo LM, Bautmans I, Aprahamian I, Schols JMGA, Izquierdo M, Vellas B. International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Sarcopenia (ICFSR): Screening, Diagnosis and Management. J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22(10):1148-1161. doi: 10.1007/s12603-018-1139-9.
PMID: 30498820BACKGROUNDDent E, Morley JE, Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Woodhouse L, Rodriguez-Manas L, Fried LP, Woo J, Aprahamian I, Sanford A, Lundy J, Landi F, Beilby J, Martin FC, Bauer JM, Ferrucci L, Merchant RA, Dong B, Arai H, Hoogendijk EO, Won CW, Abbatecola A, Cederholm T, Strandberg T, Gutierrez Robledo LM, Flicker L, Bhasin S, Aubertin-Leheudre M, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Guralnik JM, Muscedere J, Pahor M, Ruiz J, Negm AM, Reginster JY, Waters DL, Vellas B. Physical Frailty: ICFSR International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Identification and Management. J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23(9):771-787. doi: 10.1007/s12603-019-1273-z.
PMID: 31641726BACKGROUNDFried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA; Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146.
PMID: 11253156BACKGROUNDAfilalo J. Conceptual Models of Frailty: The Sarcopenia Phenotype. Can J Cardiol. 2016 Sep;32(9):1051-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.05.017. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
PMID: 27568870RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Visaratana Therakomen, Diploma
Department of Health, Ministry of Public Health
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Deputy Director for Academic Affairs of Bureau of Nutrition, Department of Health
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 26, 2023
First Posted
November 29, 2023
Study Start
March 1, 2021
Primary Completion
February 28, 2022
Study Completion
August 31, 2022
Last Updated
November 29, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
- Time Frame
- Starting 6 months after publication
- Access Criteria
- 1. Access Criteria: * Ethical Approval: Requestors must provide evidence of ethical approval from their respective institutions or review boards for the proposed analyses. * Data Security Measures: Researchers must demonstrate the implementation of robust data security measures to protect the confidentiality and integrity of the shared data. 2. Additional Supporting Information: * Study Protocol: A detailed study protocol outlining the objectives, methodologies, and analysis plan must be submitted along with the request for IPD access. * Data Dictionary: A comprehensive data dictionary defining variables, codes, and any transformations applied to the data should accompany the request.
Yes: There is a plan to make IPD and related data dictionaries available : all IPD that underlie results in a publication