A Comparison Between Dexmedetomidine and Propofol-fentanyl Infusions for Sedation for Colonoscopy Procedures
Sedation for Colonoscopy Procedures Using Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol-Fentanyl Infusions: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Different intravenous sedative drugs have been utilized for colonoscopy, with many anesthetists for painless sedation or monitored anesthesia care. The aim of this study was the quality of colonoscopy and the incidence of adverse events such as respiratory depression, hemodynamic instability, and failure to provide adequate sedation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 5, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 6, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 6, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 14, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 28, 2023
CompletedNovember 28, 2023
November 1, 2023
1.4 years
November 14, 2023
November 18, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The quality of painless sedation during colonoscopy.
The patient's ability to cooperate and perform the procedure was evaluated using a 10-point numerical rating scale (NRS).
From start of procedure to 120 minutes after end of colonoscopy
Secondary Outcomes (1)
incidence of adverse events, Prevalence of adverse effects
from start of procedure to 120 minutes after end of colonoscopy
Study Arms (2)
D group
OTHERPatients who received Dexmedetomidine. The starting dose of dexmedetomidine was 1 microgram/kg over a period of 10 minutes, and then a maintenance infusion was titrated in a range from 0.2-1 μg/kg/h).
PF group
OTHERPatients who received Propofol-Fentanyl infusions. Continued infusions of both fentanyl and propofol were 0.01-0.05 μg kg/ min 25-150 mg/h respectively.
Interventions
1 microgram/kg over a period of 10 minutes, and then a maintenance infusion was titrated in a range from 0.2-1 μg/kg/h).
Continued infusions of both fentanyl and propofol were 0.01-0.05 μg kg/ min 25-150 mg/h respectively.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- both sexes
- years old, with
- ASA physical status -
You may not qualify if:
- severe cardiovascular or respiratory disease
- (ASA grade ≥III)
- pregnancy
- allergies to the drugs being used
- known alcohol or substance abuse
- expected communication difficulties with the patient.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Zulekha Hospitalslead
- Al-Azhar Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Al-Azhar faculty of medicine
Cairo, 12546, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
sameh H Seyam, professor
Assistant professor, Anesthesiology, Intensive care and pain management
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 14, 2023
First Posted
November 28, 2023
Study Start
December 5, 2021
Primary Completion
May 6, 2023
Study Completion
May 6, 2023
Last Updated
November 28, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share