NCT06146907

Brief Summary

Down syndrome (DS) is a genetic condition that compromises physical and cognitive function. Motor development delays define DS. Additionally, there are executive function issues. Humans need dual-task activities to execute physical and cognitive tasks simultaneously. Cognitively challenged people may struggle to do dual tasks simultaneously. This shows that executive function modulation may boost motor function. Rehabilitation should include motor training and cognitive therapy to improve function. Dual-task training called exergaming combines video games with exercise and requires brain processing, decision-making, and problem-solving. Kids enjoy therapy and exercise using interactive exergames, improving adherence and results. Mental agility can be developed through simultaneous exercise. Exergaming improves balance, functional mobility, fitness, and well-being for DS youngsters. Most literature on DS children stresses physical ability over cognitive ability. Cognitive-Motor Dual-Task Exercise Program (CMDT) works in most therapy settings without equipment. Our study compares two dual-task intervention regimens for 8-14-year-old DS children's balance, functional mobility, and EF.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
23

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 7, 2023

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 27, 2023

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 28, 2024

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 20, 2024

Completed
8 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 28, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

March 5, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

November 7, 2023

Last Update Submit

March 3, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • To investigate the effect of the cognitive-motor dual-task training on balance.

    investigators will use Four-Square Step Test, which measures in seconds and will be compared to normative data for Down syndrome children

    6 weeks

  • To investigate the effect of Cognitive Motor Dual Task training on functional mobility

    investigators will use the Timed Up and Go test (measured in seconds) and compare the results for each child as pre- and post-intervention, with less time indicating improvements.

    6 weeks

  • To investigate the effect of the exergaming training on balance.

    investigators will use Four-Square Step Test, which measures in seconds and will be compared to normative data for Down syndrome children

    6 weeks.

  • To investigate the effect of exergaming training on functional mobility

    investigators will use the Timed Up and Go test (measured in seconds) and compare the results for each child as pre- and post-intervention, with less time indicating improvements.

    6 weeks

  • To investigate the effect of the cognitive-motor dual-task training on balance.

    investigators will use Pediatric Balance Scale (Maximum score = 56 points, with 56 points being a perfect score)

    6 weeks

  • To investigate the effect of the exergaming training on balance.

    investigators will use Pediatric Balance Scale (maximum score = 56 points, with 56 points being a perfect score).

    6 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • To examine the effect of cognitive-motor Motor Dual Task on Executive Function

    6 weeks

  • To examine the effect of exergaming on Executive Function

    6 weeks

Study Arms (2)

cognitive motor dual task

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

24 participants

Other: cognitive motor dual task exercises

exergaming

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

24 participants

Other: exergaming

Interventions

exercise program that combined motor tasks such as walking and juggling with cognitive task such as naming fruits or colors in the room.

cognitive motor dual task

Nintendo switch games that involve physical activity by participants to complete

exergaming

Eligibility Criteria

Age8 Years - 14 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Children with Down syndrome who are 8 to 14 years old.
  • Mild mental retardation (IQ according to the intelligence scale, mild (IQ 50-70).
  • Can stand and walk independently.
  • Follow verbal directions.

You may not qualify if:

  • Uncontrollable medical disorders or seizures.
  • Any type of disability that limits activity, such as spinal deformity.
  • Uncooperative or cannot follow instructions.
  • Children who play video games on a regular basis to avoid the extraneous activity learning effect.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

King Saud University

Riyadh, 12345, Saudi Arabia

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Halwsh SD, Algabbani MF, Alqabbani S, Alahmad TA, Almurdi MM, Alshubaily RA, Aldera M, Al-Dubisi HA, Almedlej RM, Shaheen AAM. The Effects of Cognitive-Motor Dual-Task Exercise and Exergaming on Balance and Functional Mobility in Children with Down Syndrome: A Comparative Randomized Trial. Brain Sci. 2026 Jan 6;16(1):79. doi: 10.3390/brainsci16010079.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Down Syndrome

Interventions

Exergaming

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intellectual DisabilityNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesAbnormalities, MultipleCongenital AbnormalitiesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesChromosome DisordersGenetic Diseases, Inborn

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ExerciseMotor ActivityMovementMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
the assessor will be blind to the allocation of participants in the two groups. the participants will not be aware of the presence of other treatment groups.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2023

First Posted

November 27, 2023

Study Start

August 28, 2024

Primary Completion

December 20, 2024

Study Completion

December 28, 2024

Last Updated

March 5, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

This study's individual participant data (IPD) will be shared in conformity with Saudi Arabian law, PNU/IRB policy, and ICH Good Clinical Practice recommendations. IPD will include study protocol and statistics analysis plan. With PNU/IRB permission and a data sharing agreement, we will make the IPD available to other researchers upon request. To request IPD, contact the investigator with the subject line "Request for IPD from \[study title\]." Within a year following the primary study results, we will provide the IPD. IPD requests beyond this period will be examined individually. We will not disclose IPD with participant names, addresses, or contact information. We will protect the IPD according to PNU/IRB policies and ICH Good Clinical Practice recommendations. The IPD will be securely stored and only authorized personnel can access it.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
Time Frame
1 year after publication
Access Criteria
The researcher is affiliated with a recognized academic or research institution. The researcher has a clear and well-defined research proposal that is relevant to the study and aims to generate new knowledge or insights. The researcher has the necessary expertise and resources to analyze the IPD and generate meaningful results. The researcher agrees to comply with all relevant rules and regulations, including those related to data privacy and confidentiality. The researcher agrees to use the IPD solely for the purpose of the approved research proposal and not for any commercial or other purposes. The researcher agrees to provide regular updates on the progress of the research and to share any resulting publications or findings with the study team. The researcher agrees to comply with any additional requirements or conditions set by the study team or the data provider.

Locations