NCT06144463

Brief Summary

object name: Lung ultrasound-guided fluid resuscitation in neonatal septic shock. type of study: prospective observational study. goal of study: The effects of severe ultrasound-assisted fluid resuscitation and conventional fluid resuscitation on the prognosis of children with neonatal septic shock were compared to evaluate the application value of the two techniques in fluid resuscitation of neonatal septic shock. research design: In this study, children with neonatal septic shock diagnosed in the neonatal intensive care unit of the Second People 's Hospital of Guangdong Province from January 1,2022 to December 31,2023 were included in the population. According to the different monitoring methods used in conventional / clinical shock treatment, 30 cases of fluid resuscitation assisted by severe ultrasound, 30 cases of fluid resuscitation assisted by NICOM and 30 cases of conventional fluid resuscitation were collected, a total of 90 cases. ( 1 ) The demographic data, blood examination and microbiological examination data of the two groups at admission were collected. ( 2 ) The fluid volume, blood lactic acid, blood pressure, vasoactive drugs ( such as dopamine and epinephrine / norepinephrine ), mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy and antibiotic use were collected before fluid resuscitation. ( 3 ) The cumulative fluid infusion volume during fluid resuscitation ( 6 hours ), and the use of vasoactive drugs and mechanical ventilation for 6 hours were collected. ( 4 ) NICU hospitalization time, cumulative hospitalization time and mortality were collected. Data collection : ( 1 ) The demographic data, blood examination and microbiological examination data of the three groups at admission were collected. ( 2 ) The fluid volume, blood lactic acid, blood pressure, vasoactive drugs ( such as dopamine and adrenaline / norepinephrine ), mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy and antibiotic use before fluid resuscitation were collected. ( 3 ) The cumulative fluid infusion volume during fluid resuscitation ( 6 hours ), and the use of vasoactive drugs and mechanical ventilation for 6 hours were collected. ( 4 ) NICU hospitalization time, cumulative hospitalization time and mortality were collected.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
72

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2022

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 31, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2023

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 13, 2023

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 22, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

November 28, 2023

Status Verified

November 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

November 13, 2023

Last Update Submit

November 26, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Lung ultrasoundfluid resuscitationneonatal septic shock

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • hospitalization time

    Primary indicator

    Within 2 weeks

  • mortality

    Primary indicator

    Within 2 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Cumulative fluid volume

    Within 2 weeks

  • Use of vasoactive drugs

    Within 2 weeks

  • Use of mechanical auxiliary gas

    Within 2 weeks

Study Arms (3)

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

No intervention will be given

traditional group

SHAM COMPARATOR

Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring ( NICOM ) assisted fluid resuscitation.

Diagnostic Test: lung ultrasound-guided fluid resuscitation

LUGFR group

EXPERIMENTAL

lung ultrasound-guided fluid resuscitation

Diagnostic Test: lung ultrasound-guided fluid resuscitation

Interventions

For the LUGFR group, therapy was applied based on the same treatment guidelines, and initial lung ultrasonography was performed after enrollment as baseline assessment of lung. The lung ultrasound was conducted using the Doppler ultrasound diagnostic instrument (Philips CX50) at a probe frequency range of 8 to 12 MHz. Lung ultrasonography was conducted using the 12-region method that included the anterior, lateral, and posterior walls on both sides of the lung, which was focused on the condition of A-lines, B-lines (including confluent B-line and compact B-lines), lung consolidation and pleural effusion

LUGFR grouptraditional group

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Day - 28 Days
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Born less than 28 days on admission ;
  • In line with the diagnostic criteria for neonatal septic shock in the ' 2020 International Guidelines for Saving Sepsis Campaign : Management of Sepsis-related Organ Dysfunction in Children ' ;
  • For children diagnosed with septic shock, fluid resuscitation should be performed according to the routine diagnosis and treatment.
  • The legal guardian has signed the informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • combined with neurogenic shock, trauma and hemorrhagic shock ;
  • symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus ;
  • combined with congenital heart disease ;
  • give up treatment or death within 24 hours of admission ;
  • The legal guardian refused to participate in the study ;
  • Key information and information missing.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital

Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510317, China

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Singh Y, Tissot C, Fraga MV, Yousef N, Cortes RG, Lopez J, Sanchez-de-Toledo J, Brierley J, Colunga JM, Raffaj D, Da Cruz E, Durand P, Kenderessy P, Lang HJ, Nishisaki A, Kneyber MC, Tissieres P, Conlon TW, De Luca D. International evidence-based guidelines on Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for critically ill neonates and children issued by the POCUS Working Group of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC). Crit Care. 2020 Feb 24;24(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2787-9.

    PMID: 32093763BACKGROUND
  • Huang D, You C, Mai X, Li L, Meng Q, Liang Z. Lung ultrasound-guided fluid resuscitation in neonatal septic shock: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Mar;183(3):1255-1263. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05371-9. Epub 2023 Dec 14.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Shock, Septic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

SepsisInfectionsSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeInflammationPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsShock

Study Officials

  • Zhenyu Liang, Master

    Department of Pediatrics, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Doctor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2023

First Posted

November 22, 2023

Study Start

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion

May 31, 2023

Study Completion

June 30, 2023

Last Updated

November 28, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations