NCT06137976

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to test whether it is necessary to decompress the stomach during gynecologic laparoscopy. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is there appropriate visualization during surgery without stomach decompression?
  • Can the surgeon tell the stomach is decompressed?
  • Is the stomach at risk for injury during surgery?
  • How is the patient's postoperative experience affected? Participants will undergo their planned surgery as usual and will be asked to complete log about their recovery for the first week after surgery. Researchers will compare patients who have their stomach decompressed during surgery to those who do not undergo stomach decompression to see if it is necessary.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 6, 2023

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 18, 2023

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 20, 2023

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 17, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 28, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

May 30, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

November 6, 2023

Last Update Submit

May 28, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Gastric decompressionGynecologic surgeryGynecologic laparoscopySurgical visualizationEnhanced Recovery After Surgery

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Adequate gastric decompression

    The primary endpoint is the percentage of cases rated as adequate decompression by the surgeon.

    At time of surgery

  • Gastric injury

    The primary safety endpoint is the estimated negligible rate of gastric injury.

    Up to six weeks post-operatively

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Presence of gastric decompression tube

    At time of surgery

  • Gastric injury risk assessment

    At time of surgery

  • Degree of stomach decompression

    At time of surgery

  • Entry proximity

    At time of surgery

  • Post-operative experience questionnaire

    First 7 days after surgery

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Gastric decompression

EXPERIMENTAL

Placement of the nasogastric or orogastric tube will occur after intubation while surgeons are scrubbing and out of the room to maintain blinding. At the end of surgery, the nasogastric or orogastric tube will be removed prior to removal of the surgical drapes to ensure the surgeon remains blinded. Patients will then be returned to routine post-operative care as otherwise planned or necessitated by surgery.

Procedure: Gastric decompression (oropharyngeal or nasopharyngeal gastric tube)

No gastric decompression

NO INTERVENTION

No placement of gastric decompression tube.

Interventions

Placement of tube through the nose or mouth into the stomach for gastric decompression

Gastric decompression

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy for the following indications: hysterectomy, adnexal surgery, benign and malignant tumors or disease, diagnostic purposes, lysis of adhesions, and pelvic pain.
  • Surgery being performed by gynecologic surgeon with or without minimally invasive gynecologist certification, gynecologic oncologists, urogynecologists, and reproductive endocrinologists.

You may not qualify if:

  • Entry sites other than umbilical
  • Planned or high suspicion for bowel surgery
  • Anticipated surgical time \>4 hours
  • Known diagnosis of gastric reflux disease or peptic ulcer disease
  • Prior history of gastric or esophageal surgery excluding endoscopy
  • Day of surgery emesis events
  • Difficult intubation determined by anesthesia
  • Intrauterine pregnancy
  • Chronic lung disease
  • Individuals with smoking history.
  • Individuals who do not speak English due to limitations in ability to reliably obtain informed consent in their primary language.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

259 E Erie - Northwestern

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

Location

Prentice Women'S Hospital

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

Location

Related Publications (18)

  • Berkow, L. Rapid sequence induction and intubation (RSII) for anesthesia. UpToDate, 2023. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/rapid-sequence-induction-and-intubation-rsii-for-anesthesia

    BACKGROUND
  • Cheatham ML, Chapman WC, Key SP, Sawyers JL. A meta-analysis of selective versus routine nasogastric decompression after elective laparotomy. Ann Surg. 1995 May;221(5):469-76; discussion 476-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199505000-00004.

    PMID: 7748028BACKGROUND
  • Chui PT, Gin T, Oh TE. Anaesthesia for laparoscopic general surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1993 Apr;21(2):163-71. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9302100205.

    PMID: 8517506BACKGROUND
  • Coskun F. Anesthesia for gynecologic laparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1999 Aug;6(3):245-58. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(99)80057-7.

    PMID: 10459023BACKGROUND
  • Feldheiser A, Aziz O, Baldini G, Cox BP, Fearon KC, Feldman LS, Gan TJ, Kennedy RH, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN, Miller T, Radtke FF, Ruiz Garces T, Schricker T, Scott MJ, Thacker JK, Ytrebo LM, Carli F. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2: consensus statement for anaesthesia practice. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016 Mar;60(3):289-334. doi: 10.1111/aas.12651. Epub 2015 Oct 30.

    PMID: 26514824BACKGROUND
  • Hodin, R. Inpatient placement and management of nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes in adults. UpToDate, 2023. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/inpatient-placement-and-management-of-nasogastric-and-nasoenteric-tubes-in-adults

    BACKGROUND
  • Hu H, Choi JDW, Edye MB, Aitken T, Kapurubandara S. Gastric Injury at Laparoscopy for Gynecologic Indications: A Systematic Review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 Nov;29(11):1224-1230. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.09.058. Epub 2022 Sep 30.

    PMID: 36184063BACKGROUND
  • Manning BJ, Winter DC, McGreal G, Kirwan WO, Redmond HP. Nasogastric intubation causes gastroesophageal reflux in patients undergoing elective laparotomy. Surgery. 2001 Nov;130(5):788-91. doi: 10.1067/msy.2001.116029.

    PMID: 11685187BACKGROUND
  • Michowitz M, Chen J, Waizbard E, Bawnik JB. Abdominal operations without nasogastric tube decompression of the gastrointestinal tract. Am Surg. 1988 Nov;54(11):672-5.

    PMID: 3190004BACKGROUND
  • Nelson R, Edwards S, Tse B. Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;2007(3):CD004929. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004929.pub3.

    PMID: 17636780BACKGROUND
  • Nelson G, Altman AD, Nick A, Meyer LA, Ramirez PT, Achtari C, Antrobus J, Huang J, Scott M, Wijk L, Acheson N, Ljungqvist O, Dowdy SC. Guidelines for pre- and intra-operative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations--Part I. Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Feb;140(2):313-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.11.015. Epub 2015 Nov 18. No abstract available.

    PMID: 26603969BACKGROUND
  • Nelson G, Bakkum-Gamez J, Kalogera E, Glaser G, Altman A, Meyer LA, Taylor JS, Iniesta M, Lasala J, Mena G, Scott M, Gillis C, Elias K, Wijk L, Huang J, Nygren J, Ljungqvist O, Ramirez PT, Dowdy SC. Guidelines for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncology: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations-2019 update. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 May;29(4):651-668. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000356. Epub 2019 Mar 15.

    PMID: 30877144BACKGROUND
  • Rao W, Zhang X, Zhang J, Yan R, Hu Z, Wang Q. The role of nasogastric tube in decompression after elective colon and rectum surgery: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011 Apr;26(4):423-9. doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-1093-4. Epub 2010 Nov 24.

    PMID: 21107848BACKGROUND
  • Scheib SA, Thomassee M, Kenner JL. Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Gynecology: A Review of the Literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Feb;26(2):327-343. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.12.010. Epub 2018 Dec 20.

    PMID: 30580100BACKGROUND
  • Schwartz KM, Wright KN, Richards EG, King LP, Park AJ. Sustainability in Healthcare: A Call to Action for Surgeons and Healthcare Leaders. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 Sep;29(9):1040-1042. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.06.024. Epub 2022 Jul 1. No abstract available.

    PMID: 35788396BACKGROUND
  • Siedhoff MT, Clark LH, Hobbs KA, Findley AD, Moulder JK, Garrett JM. Mechanical bowel preparation before laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;123(3):562-567. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000121.

    PMID: 24499763BACKGROUND
  • Stone R, Carey E, Fader AN, Fitzgerald J, Hammons L, Nensi A, Park AJ, Ricci S, Rosenfield R, Scheib S, Weston E. Enhanced Recovery and Surgical Optimization Protocol for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: An AAGL White Paper. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Feb;28(2):179-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.08.006. Epub 2020 Aug 20.

    PMID: 32827721BACKGROUND
  • ACOG Committee Opinion No. 750 Summary: Perioperative Pathways: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;132(3):801-802. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002819.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Nausea and VomitingPostoperative Complications

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNauseaSigns and Symptoms, DigestiveSigns and SymptomsVomiting

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Masking Details
* Patient will masked to group assignment and will be under anesthesia during intervention. * Surgeon will be masked to group assignment. Placement of the nasogastric or orogastric tube will occur while the surgeon is scrubbing and out of the room. There will be a drape over the face until the surgical drapes are covering the patient to maintain surgeon blinding. Removal of tube will take place prior to undraping the patient to maintain blinding. * All documents noted group assignment will be in an opaque envelope.
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: * Block randomization in groups of 10 to either receive nasogastric or orogastric intubation after endotracheal intubation prior to abdominal entry for the duration of the surgery or no gastric decompression at all. * Sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelope (SNOSE) technique
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Chief of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2023

First Posted

November 18, 2023

Study Start

November 20, 2023

Primary Completion

March 17, 2025

Study Completion

April 28, 2025

Last Updated

May 30, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations