The Effect of Body Position on Oropharyngeal Swallow Function in Infants
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Infants are typically fed in a cradled, upright position, however feeding specialists/SLPs often position infants in a side-lying position to promote safe, quality, and neurodevelopmentally protective feeding which is supported by currently available literature. Side-lying position is often recommended by feeding specialists to reduce the risk for aspiration and improve other components of infant swallow function. However, there is no literature directly assessing airway protection during the swallow with the infant in the side-lying versus upright positions. The goal of this study is to conduct an instrumental assessment (Modified Barium Swallow/Videofluoroscopic Swallow Study) in these different positions (upright versus side-lying) to determine if there is a difference in airway compromise. The target population are infants between post-menstrual ages of 38-56 weeks who are referred for a modified barium swallow study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 28, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 24, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 20, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 20, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 20, 2024
CompletedFebruary 5, 2025
February 1, 2025
1 year
March 28, 2023
February 3, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Airway invasion outcome
This will be measured via the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (Rosenbek et al., 1996). The PAS is an 8-point scale that is a reliable measure of airway invasion in infant bottle-feeders (Gosa \& Suiter, 2011; Martin-Harris et al., 2020). The scale ranges from 1-8, with 1 indicating no airway invasion and an 8 indicating silent aspiration.
Highest rating on the Penetration-Aspiration Scale will be recorded for each trial for each infant for the entirety of the study, roughly 1 year.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Swallow initiation outcome
Lowest location of bolus (presenting highest risk) will be recorded for each trial for each infant for the entirety of the study, roughly 1 year.
Suck-swallow-breathe (SSwB) coordination outcome
number of sucks, swallows, and breaths will be counted for each swallowing trial for each infant for the entirety of the study, roughly 1 year.
Study Arms (2)
Sidelying, then Upright
ACTIVE COMPARATORPositioning in sidelying on radiology table for assessment, then will be positioned upright in tumbleform. Same bottle and liquid viscosities will be assessed in both positions.
Upright, then Sidelying
ACTIVE COMPARATORPositioned upright in tumbleform, then will be positioned sidelying on radiology table for assessment. Same bottle and liquid viscosities will be assessed in both positions.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The age of the infant at the time of the study must be between 38 to 56 weeks post-menstrual age (PMA) (American Academy of Pediatrics, 2004; Balest et al., 2021, Han et al. 2020; McGratten et al., 2020).
- Infant has been referred for an MBS by their physician based on clinical need (suspected oropharyngeal dysphagia)
- Only infants with confirmed pharyngeal dysphagia, as defined by at least one airway invasion event on their MBS, will be included in final data analysis
You may not qualify if:
- Infants who are deemed not medically stable enough to complete an MBS
- Infants who are deemed unable to maintain a side-lying or upright position for at least 3 minutes
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Connecticut Children's Medical Center
Hartford, Connecticut, 06106, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sara Burnham
Connecticut Children's Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 28, 2023
First Posted
May 24, 2023
Study Start
December 20, 2023
Primary Completion
December 20, 2024
Study Completion
December 20, 2024
Last Updated
February 5, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share