Enhancing Balance and Mobility in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
1 other identifier
interventional
5
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of balance therapy with an overground gait trainer in incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI). The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Is balance therapy with an overground gait trainer effective in improving functional ambulation in SCI?
- Is balance therapy with an overground gait trainer effective in enhancing Activities of Daily Living in SCI? Participants treated with either:
- Overground gait trainer along with conventional exercise therapy
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 14, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 18, 2023
CompletedNovember 18, 2023
November 1, 2023
10 months
November 14, 2023
November 14, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Berg Balance Scale
Berg Balance Scale for balance assessment
11 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Ten-Meter Walking Test
11 months
Timed Up and Go Test
11 months
Walking Index in Spinal Cord Injury II
11 months
Modified Borg Scale
11 months
Visual Analogue Scale
11 months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Balance Training
EXPERIMENTALThe study included five participants who were over 18 years of age and had experienced a spinal injury within the past year. These participants were classified as AIS D (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale). Patients underwent treatment for eight weeks, with walking and balance exercises on Andago performed three days a week. In addition, conventional in-bed exercises, including stretching, strengthening, and mobility exercises, were administered for 40 minutes, two days a week.
Interventions
Patients underwent treatment for eight weeks, with walking and balance exercises on Andago performed three days a week. In addition, conventional in-bed exercises, including stretching, strengthening, and mobility exercises, were administered for 40 minutes, two days a week.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Spinal Cord Injured below T4
- Time from injury \< 1 year
- D level on AIS (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale)
- Patients with spinal stabilization
You may not qualify if:
- Osteoporosis
- An implanted electronic device
- other neurological diseases
- Cardio-pulmonary diseases
- Orthopedic diseases
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ankara City Hospital
Ankara, 06800, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (7)
Yu P, Zhang W, Liu Y, Sheng C, So KF, Zhou L, Zhu H. The effects and potential mechanisms of locomotor training on improvements of functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2019;147:199-217. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2019.08.003. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
PMID: 31607355BACKGROUNDHayta E, Elden H. Acute spinal cord injury: A review of pathophysiology and potential of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for pharmacological intervention. J Chem Neuroanat. 2018 Jan;87:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
PMID: 28803968BACKGROUNDFinlayson ML, Peterson EW. Falls, aging, and disability. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2010 May;21(2):357-73. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2009.12.003.
PMID: 20494282BACKGROUNDContreras-Vidal JL, A Bhagat N, Brantley J, Cruz-Garza JG, He Y, Manley Q, Nakagome S, Nathan K, Tan SH, Zhu F, Pons JL. Powered exoskeletons for bipedal locomotion after spinal cord injury. J Neural Eng. 2016 Jun;13(3):031001. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/3/031001. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
PMID: 27064508BACKGROUNDEsquenazi A, Talaty M, Packel A, Saulino M. The ReWalk powered exoskeleton to restore ambulatory function to individuals with thoracic-level motor-complete spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Nov;91(11):911-21. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318269d9a3.
PMID: 23085703BACKGROUNDFouad K, Tetzlaff W. Rehabilitative training and plasticity following spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol. 2012 May;235(1):91-9. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.02.009. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
PMID: 21333646BACKGROUNDLeech KA, Kinnaird CR, Holleran CL, Kahn J, Hornby TG. Effects of Locomotor Exercise Intensity on Gait Performance in Individuals With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury. Phys Ther. 2016 Dec;96(12):1919-1929. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150646. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
PMID: 27313241BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 14, 2023
First Posted
November 18, 2023
Study Start
January 1, 2022
Primary Completion
November 1, 2022
Study Completion
November 1, 2022
Last Updated
November 18, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11