NCT06121076

Brief Summary

The goal of this intervention study is to test the effectiveness of a training program for hospital-based midwives. The main questions it aims to answer are: •Does SDM combined EBP training improve midwives' SDM and EBP competency? • What are factors related to SDM competency in midwives? Participants will participate in a 20-hour training program, including lectures and hands-on practice sessions. Researchers will compare groups that receive SDM training with or without EBP training to see if there are changes in midwives' SDM and EBP competency.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
72

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2021

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2021

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2022

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2023

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 23, 2023

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 7, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

November 7, 2023

Status Verified

November 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

October 23, 2023

Last Update Submit

November 5, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

shared-decision makingevidence-based practicemidwife

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • SDM competency from midwives' perspective

    The SDM competency from a midwife's perspective is defined as the ability perceived by midwives to involve patients in the decision-making process. It is measured using the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaires for healthcare professionals (SDM-Doc). The questionnaire consists of 9 items, and each item represents a statement that features various aspects of SDM using a 6-point Likert scale from 0 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). A total score ranged from 0\~45; higher scores indicate a higher level of SDM competency.

    baseline, week 2, week 4

  • SDM competency from observers' perspective

    The SDM competency, from the observers' perspective, is defined as the efforts of healthcare professionals to involve patients in decision-making from blinded observers. It is measured by the Observing Patient Involvement scale (OPTION5). Each item was scored on a 5-point scale from 0 (no effort) to 4 (exemplary effort). A total score ranged from 0\~20, with higher scores and higher levels of the extent to which healthcare providers involved patients in decision-making.

    baseline, week 2, week 4

  • SDM competency from patients' perspective

    The SDM competency from a patient's perspective is defined as the patient's perceived extent to which SDM has taken place in the encounter with midwives. It is measured using the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaires for patients (SDM-Q-9). The questionnaire consists of 9 items, and each item represents a statement that features various aspects of SDM using a 6-point Likert scale from 0 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). A total score ranged from 0\~45; higher scores indicate a higher level of SDM competency.

    baseline, week 2, week 4

  • Decision support skill

    Decision support skill is defined as midwives' competency to support patients during the decision-making process. It is measured from blinded observers using the Decision Support Analysis Tool (DSAT10). DSAT10 has five categories of decision-making status, knowledge of options, values associated with outcomes of options, others' involvement, and next steps plan. Assessing and intervening are differentiated in the scale. Each check item was rated as present (1) or absent (0). Not applicable was used in circumstances when it was not necessary to have met an item. A total score ranged from 0\~10, with higher scores for better SDM skills.

    baseline, week 2, week 4

  • Communication skill

    Communication skill is defined as midwives' competency to express verbal and non-verbal behaviors of patient- and relationship-centered communication. It is measured from blinded observers using the Four Habits Coding Scheme. The 4HCS consisted of 23 items with four habits of basic medical interview, including invest in the beginning (6 items), elicit the patient's perspective (3 items), demonstrate empathy (4 items), and invest in the end (10 items). Each item was scored on a 5-point scale from 1 (ineffective) to 5 (highly effective). A total score ranged from 23\~115, with higher scores for more effective patient-centered communication in consultations.

    baseline, week 2, week 4

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Level of EBP competency

    baseline, week 2, week 4

  • Decision conflict

    baseline, week 2, week 4

Study Arms (2)

SDM-EBP training

EXPERIMENTAL

the group received SDM combined with EBP training

Other: SDM-EBP training

control

OTHER

the group received received SDM without EBP training

Other: SDM-EBP training

Interventions

A 20-hour tailored SDM combined with EBP training program consisting of a seven-hour lecture and a four-hour hands-on practice session.

SDM-EBP trainingcontrol

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • provide hands-on care to patients for at least three months
  • licensed to practice midwifery
  • willing to participate in the study.
  • having SURE test score less than 4 (SURE was a decisional conflict screening tool. A score less than 4 was a positive result for decisional conflict)
  • willing to participate in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients requiring emergency medical attention

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Obstetric hospital

Ho Chi Minh City, 700000, Vietnam

Location

Study Officials

  • Mei-ling Yeh, PhD

    National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
lecturer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 23, 2023

First Posted

November 7, 2023

Study Start

June 1, 2021

Primary Completion

June 1, 2022

Study Completion

June 1, 2023

Last Updated

November 7, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations