Non-inferiority Trial Between Sotair® Device Attached to Manual Resuscitator Versus Mechanical Ventilation
Non-inferiority Comparative Trial Between Sotair® Device Attached to Manual Resuscitator Versus Mechanical Ventilation in Patients Undergoing Non-emergent Surgery With General Anesthesia
1 other identifier
interventional
310
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Effective respiratory ventilation is achieved by moving the right amount of air in and out of the lungs while keeping the pressures at a safe level. A disposable safety device, Adult Sotair®, was created to improve manual ventilation delivery. In this non-inferiority study, we will perform a pre-post study design (single group, within-group comparison) to test the non-inferiority of the Adult Sotair® device compared to mechanical ventilation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 31, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 7, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 20, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2025
CompletedJuly 11, 2025
July 1, 2025
1.5 years
October 31, 2023
July 9, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Peak airway pressure
mean peak airway pressure expressed in cm H20
Recorded for 3 minute duration for each arm of the study
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Tidal volume
Recorded for 3 minute duration for each arm of the study
Airflow
Recorded for 3 minute duration for each arm of the study
Respiratory rate
Recorded for 3 minute duration for each arm of the study
Oxygen saturation (SpO2)
Recorded for 3 minute duration for each arm of the study
End Tidal CO2
Recorded for 3 minute duration for each arm of the study
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Bag mask ventilation with Adult Sotair device
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe anesthesia provider will manually bag ventilate with the Adult Sotair® device for 3 minutes.
Mechanical Ventilation
NO INTERVENTIONThe anesthesia provider will remove the bag valve mask and Adult Sotair® device and connect the patient to the mechanical ventilator. The recording of pressure and flow will last for 3 minutes.
Interventions
Sotair® device employs a flow limiting and pressure control valve mechanism.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients who are scheduled for non-emergency surgery with general anesthesia at Rhode Island Hospital.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2
You may not qualify if:
- ASA PS \>3 (e.g., respiratory disease)
- Oropharyngeal or facial pathology
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903, United States
Related Publications (4)
Fogarty M, Kuck K, Orr J, Sakata D. A comparison of controlled ventilation with a noninvasive ventilator versus traditional mask ventilation. J Clin Monit Comput. 2020 Aug;34(4):771-777. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00365-1. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
PMID: 31338661BACKGROUNDvon Goedecke A, Bowden K, Wenzel V, Keller C, Gabrielli A. Effects of decreasing inspiratory times during simulated bag-valve-mask ventilation. Resuscitation. 2005 Mar;64(3):321-5. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.09.003.
PMID: 15733761BACKGROUNDCulbreth RE, Gardenhire DS. Manual bag valve mask ventilation performance among respiratory therapists. Heart Lung. 2021 May-Jun;50(3):471-475. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.10.012. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
PMID: 33138977BACKGROUNDHutten MC, Goos TG, Ophelders D, Nikiforou M, Kuypers E, Willems M, Niemarkt HJ, Dankelman J, Andriessen P, Mohns T, Reiss IK, Kramer BW. Fully automated predictive intelligent control of oxygenation (PRICO) in resuscitation and ventilation of preterm lambs. Pediatr Res. 2015 Dec;78(6):657-63. doi: 10.1038/pr.2015.158. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
PMID: 26322409BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mark Kendall, MD
Rhode Island Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- The care provider will not know the recorded lung function recordings.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of Clinical Research
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 31, 2023
First Posted
November 7, 2023
Study Start
December 20, 2023
Primary Completion
June 30, 2025
Study Completion
July 1, 2025
Last Updated
July 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- SAP
- Time Frame
- The SAP will be available at the end of the trial for three years. The data that supports the findings of this study will be available from the corresponding investigator upon reasonable request.
The IPD that underlie results in a publication will be shared with other researchers.