Effect of PEEP=5cmH2O vs PEEP=0cmH2O PSV Strategies During SBT on Successful Disconnection From Mechanical Ventilation
PPSDMV-RCT
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Mechanical ventilation is the most common means of life support in intensive care unit. Daily spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) is the most effective method to evaluate whether patients on mechanical ventilation can be removed from the ventilator, thus reducing mechanical ventilation duration and ventilator-related complications. Pressure support ventilation and T-piece ventilation are the two most commonly used SBT methods, lasting from 30 minutes to 2 hours. However, the parameter setting for SBT using PSV method has not been completely agreed, especially regarding the use of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Therefore, we intend to conduct a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled study to evaluate the impact of PEEP=0cmH2O and PEEP=5cmH2O on extubation success rate and re-intubation rate in mechanically ventilated patients, to provide high-level clinical evidence on the use of PEEP for SBT in patients with mechanical ventilation, so as to reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation and complications related to mechanical ventilation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 7, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 10, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 25, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2021
CompletedJune 25, 2021
June 1, 2021
1.1 years
June 7, 2020
June 17, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Extubation success rate
The success rate of extubation (during 48 hours after the first SBT if successfully removed from the ventilator).
during 48 hours after the first SBT
Reintubation rate
The reintubation rate of respiratory failure after extubation.
during 48 hours after extubation
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Reintubation rate at 72 hours
during 72 hours after extubation
No mechanical ventilation duration in ICU
From first transfer in ICU to transfer out ICU up to 28 days after randomization
Length of ICU stay
From admission to discharge from ICU up to 28 days after randomization
ICU mortality, 28-day mortality
28 day
Results of blood gas analysis
every 30 min during SBT up one hour to and 30min after extubation
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Chest electrical impedance imaging (EIT)
from the start to the end of SBT up to one hour and 30min after extubation
Subjective score of patients with dyspnea
every 30 min during SBT up to one hour and 30min after extubation
Study Arms (2)
PEEP=5cmH2O
EXPERIMENTALIn PSV mode,PS = 8 cmH2O,PEEP= 5 cmH2O, and FiO2 level was consistent with that before SBT
PEEP=0cmH2O
EXPERIMENTALIn PSV mode,PS = 8 cmH2O,PEEP=0 cmH2O, and FiO2 level was consistent with that before SBT
Interventions
The patients who met the withdrawal screening criteria were randomly divided into low pressure support level PSV spontaneous respiration test.The duration of the spontaneous breathing test was 30 minutes, and the results of the spontaneous breathing test were evaluated at the end of the test.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \) Older than 18;
- \) Patients with mechanical ventilation for 24h;
- \) Meet the screening standards for daily disconnection;
- \) The study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and China's regulations on clinical trial research, and the patient or his/her family members have informed and agreed to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- \) Patients undergoing tracheotomy;
- \) Patients who refuse to be intubated again after endotracheal intubation is removed;
- \) Patients on long-term mechanical ventilation: mechanical ventilation duration was continuous for 21 days, \>6 h/d;
- \) The attending physician decides the withdrawal plan (e.g., the potential pathology is more favorable to the specific withdrawal plan).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The first affiliated hospital of SunYatSen University
Guanzhou, Guangdong, 510080, China
Related Publications (16)
Esteban A, Frutos F, Tobin MJ, Alia I, Solsona JF, Valverdu I, Fernandez R, de la Cal MA, Benito S, Tomas R, et al. A comparison of four methods of weaning patients from mechanical ventilation. Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group. N Engl J Med. 1995 Feb 9;332(6):345-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199502093320601.
PMID: 7823995BACKGROUNDEly EW, Baker AM, Dunagan DP, Burke HL, Smith AC, Kelly PT, Johnson MM, Browder RW, Bowton DL, Haponik EF. Effect on the duration of mechanical ventilation of identifying patients capable of breathing spontaneously. N Engl J Med. 1996 Dec 19;335(25):1864-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199612193352502.
PMID: 8948561BACKGROUNDEsteban A, Alia I, Gordo F, Fernandez R, Solsona JF, Vallverdu I, Macias S, Allegue JM, Blanco J, Carriedo D, Leon M, de la Cal MA, Taboada F, Gonzalez de Velasco J, Palazon E, Carrizosa F, Tomas R, Suarez J, Goldwasser RS. Extubation outcome after spontaneous breathing trials with T-tube or pressure support ventilation. The Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Aug;156(2 Pt 1):459-65. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.156.2.9610109.
PMID: 9279224BACKGROUNDEsteban A, Alia I, Tobin MJ, Gil A, Gordo F, Vallverdu I, Blanch L, Bonet A, Vazquez A, de Pablo R, Torres A, de La Cal MA, Macias S. Effect of spontaneous breathing trial duration on outcome of attempts to discontinue mechanical ventilation. Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Feb;159(2):512-8. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.159.2.9803106.
PMID: 9927366BACKGROUNDPerren A, Domenighetti G, Mauri S, Genini F, Vizzardi N. Protocol-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation: clinical outcome in patients randomized for a 30-min or 120-min trial with pressure support ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2002 Aug;28(8):1058-63. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1353-z. Epub 2002 Jul 13.
PMID: 12185425BACKGROUNDSklar MC, Burns K, Rittayamai N, Lanys A, Rauseo M, Chen L, Dres M, Chen GQ, Goligher EC, Adhikari NKJ, Brochard L, Friedrich JO. Effort to Breathe with Various Spontaneous Breathing Trial Techniques. A Physiologic Meta-analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Jun 1;195(11):1477-1485. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201607-1338OC.
PMID: 27768396BACKGROUNDPellegrini JA, Moraes RB, Maccari JG, de Oliveira RP, Savi A, Ribeiro RA, Burns KE, Teixeira C. Spontaneous Breathing Trials With T-Piece or Pressure Support Ventilation. Respir Care. 2016 Dec;61(12):1693-1703. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04816. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
PMID: 27601720BACKGROUNDBurns KEA, Soliman I, Adhikari NKJ, Zwein A, Wong JTY, Gomez-Builes C, Pellegrini JA, Chen L, Rittayamai N, Sklar M, Brochard LJ, Friedrich JO. Trials directly comparing alternative spontaneous breathing trial techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2017 Jun 1;21(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1698-x.
PMID: 28576127BACKGROUNDLi Y, Li H, Zhang D. Comparison of T-piece and pressure support ventilation as spontaneous breathing trials in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2020 Feb 26;24(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2764-3.
PMID: 32102693BACKGROUNDSubira C, Hernandez G, Vazquez A, Rodriguez-Garcia R, Gonzalez-Castro A, Garcia C, Rubio O, Ventura L, Lopez A, de la Torre MC, Keough E, Arauzo V, Hermosa C, Sanchez C, Tizon A, Tenza E, Laborda C, Cabanes S, Lacueva V, Del Mar Fernandez M, Arnau A, Fernandez R. Effect of Pressure Support vs T-Piece Ventilation Strategies During Spontaneous Breathing Trials on Successful Extubation Among Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 Jun 11;321(22):2175-2182. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.7234.
PMID: 31184740BACKGROUNDSchmidt GA, Girard TD, Kress JP, Morris PE, Ouellette DR, Alhazzani W, Burns SM, Epstein SK, Esteban A, Fan E, Ferrer M, Fraser GL, Gong MN, Hough CL, Mehta S, Nanchal R, Patel S, Pawlik AJ, Schweickert WD, Sessler CN, Strom T, Wilson KC, Truwit JD. Liberation From Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults: Executive Summary of an Official American College of Chest Physicians/American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Chest. 2017 Jan;151(1):160-165. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.037. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
PMID: 27818329BACKGROUNDEl-Khatib MF, Zeineldine SM, Jamaleddine GW. Effect of pressure support ventilation and positive end expiratory pressure on the rapid shallow breathing index in intensive care unit patients. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Mar;34(3):505-10. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0939-x. Epub 2007 Dec 1.
PMID: 18060662BACKGROUNDFutier E, Constantin JM, Petit A, Jung B, Kwiatkowski F, Duclos M, Jaber S, Bazin JE. Positive end-expiratory pressure improves end-expiratory lung volume but not oxygenation after induction of anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jun;27(6):508-13. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283398806.
PMID: 20404729BACKGROUNDOstberg E, Thorisson A, Enlund M, Zetterstrom H, Hedenstierna G, Edmark L. Positive End-expiratory Pressure Alone Minimizes Atelectasis Formation in Nonabdominal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesthesiology. 2018 Jun;128(6):1117-1124. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002134.
PMID: 29462011BACKGROUNDYoung CC, Harris EM, Vacchiano C, Bodnar S, Bukowy B, Elliott RRD, Migliarese J, Ragains C, Trethewey B, Woodward A, Gama de Abreu M, Girard M, Futier E, Mulier JP, Pelosi P, Sprung J. Lung-protective ventilation for the surgical patient: international expert panel-based consensus recommendations. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Dec;123(6):898-913. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.08.017. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
PMID: 31587835BACKGROUNDCabello B, Thille AW, Roche-Campo F, Brochard L, Gomez FJ, Mancebo J. Physiological comparison of three spontaneous breathing trials in difficult-to-wean patients. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Jul;36(7):1171-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1870-0. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
PMID: 20352189BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
ZiMeng Liu, Doctor
First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 7, 2020
First Posted
June 25, 2021
Study Start
June 10, 2020
Primary Completion
August 1, 2021
Study Completion
August 1, 2021
Last Updated
June 25, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06