Ketamine-midazolam as a Sedative Agent in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.
Combination Use of Intravenous Ketamine-midazolam as a Sedative Agent in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography ; A Randomized Control Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Does Ketamine-Midazolam have a better efficacy and safety profile compared to Midazolam - Pethidine in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Jul 2023
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 18, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 12, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 27, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 25, 2024
CompletedMarch 25, 2025
October 1, 2024
7 months
October 12, 2023
March 20, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To compare the depth of sedation
The depth of sedation is evaluated using ramsay sedation scale where the scale is 1 to 6, where higher score is better
Evaluated at specific timepoints during the procedure whch are: introduction of scope, canulation of bile duct, trawling of stones, removal of stent and removal of scope
Secondary Outcomes (5)
To evaluate the efficacy of Ketamine- Midazolam as a sedative agent in ERCP in terms of sedation failure rate.
Evaluated at specific timepoints during the procedure whch are: introduction of scope, canulation of bile duct, during sphincerotomy, removal of stent and removal of scope
To compare pre and post procedure mean arterial pressure (MAP)
Measured at specific time-pointswhich are: pre-sedation, 2 minutes after initiation of sedation and 5 minutes after the procedure is completed
To compare surgeon satisfaction in terms of sedation quality between both arms using a likert scale of 1 to 5 where a higher score is better
Single point asessment at the end of the procedure
To compare participant satisfaction in terms of procedure experience between both groups using likert scale of 1 to 10 where the higher score is better
Single point asessment at 2 hours after completion of procedure
To compare the number of participants that developed an adverse event that led to abandonment of procedure
Evaluated at specific timepoints during the procedure which are: introduction of scope, canulation of bile duct, during sphincerotomy, trawling of stones, removal of stent and removal of scope
Study Arms (2)
Ketamine - Midazolam arm
EXPERIMENTALInitial IV Ketamine of 0.5mg/kg with IV Midazolam 0.02mg/kg given over 1 minute. If depth of sedation not adequate, to give another bolus of IV ketamine 0.25mg/kg after 2 minutes with IV Midazolam 0.01mg/kg. If depth of sedation not adequate, to give another bolus of IV Ketamine 0.25mg/kg after 2 minutes and IV Midazolam 0.01mg/kg. Failure of sedation: inadequate sedation for the intention to treat: patient will be arranged for MAC (monitored anaesthesia care) with anaesthesia team
Midazolam - Pethidine arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORInitial IV Midazolam 0.05mg/kg given over 1 minute with IV Pethidine 0.7mcg/kg. If depth of sedation not If adequate, to give another bolus of IV Midazolam 0.02mg/kg after 2 minutes and IV Pethidine 0.7mcg/kg. If depth of sedation not adequate, to give another bolus of IV Midazolam 0.02mg/kg after 2 minutes. Failure of sedation: inadequate sedation for the intention to treat: patient will be arranged for MAC (monitored anaesthesia care) with anaesthesia team.
Interventions
Administration described in arm/ group description
Administration described in arm/ group description
Administration described in arm/ group description
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults \> 18 years old which able to give valid consent
- Patient planned for ERCP (either emergency or elective)
- American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) score of I-III
You may not qualify if:
- Known hypersensitivity towards Ketamine or Midazolam
- Increased intracranial pressure, acute stroke (\<3 months), intracranial haemorrhage (\<3 months)
- Severe hypertension (BP\>170/110) and tachycardia (Heart rate \>110)
- Acute myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome (\< 6 months)
- Tachyarrhythmia
- Pregnancy
- Intravenous drug user (IVDU) or substance abuse patient
- History of hallucination
- Child's Pugh class C
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz UKM
Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia
Related Publications (5)
Narayanan S, Shannon A, Nandalan S, Jaitly V, Greer S. Alternative sedation for the higher risk endoscopy: a randomized controlled trial of ketamine use in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015;50(10):1293-303. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2015.1036113. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
PMID: 26061267BACKGROUNDTobias JD, Leder M. Procedural sedation: A review of sedative agents, monitoring, and management of complications. Saudi J Anaesth. 2011 Oct;5(4):395-410. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.87270.
PMID: 22144928BACKGROUNDJung M, Hofmann C, Kiesslich R, Brackertz A. Improved sedation in diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: propofol is an alternative to midazolam. Endoscopy. 2000 Mar;32(3):233-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-96.
PMID: 10718389BACKGROUNDTokmak S, Cetin MF, Torun S. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the very elderly by using a combination of intravenous midazolam, ketamine and pethidine. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2021 Oct;21(10):887-892. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14252. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
PMID: 34427037BACKGROUNDGoudra B, Nuzat A, Singh PM, Borle A, Carlin A, Gouda G. Association between Type of Sedation and the Adverse Events Associated with Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: An Analysis of 5 Years' Data from a Tertiary Center in the USA. Clin Endosc. 2017 Mar;50(2):161-169. doi: 10.5946/ce.2016.019. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
PMID: 27126387BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Azlanudin Azman
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- Care provider is blinded from knowing the group of the study. However patients are informed regarding the drugs received
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 12, 2023
First Posted
November 1, 2023
Study Start
July 18, 2023
Primary Completion
February 27, 2024
Study Completion
October 25, 2024
Last Updated
March 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Currently undecided