NCT06092281

Brief Summary

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is now considered the standard treatment for early gastrointestinal neoplasms. However, there is still a possibility of developing local recurrence or metachronous neoplasia after ESD. Regular endoscopic surveillance after ESD can identify and remove local recurrences and metachronous lesions early, improving patient prognosis. However, the patient compliance with post-ESD endoscopic surveillance is currently unclear, and many patients fail to adhere to the scheduled follow-up. A prospective, randomized controlled, superiority trial was designed to evaluate whether completing a questionnaire and receiving feedback on compliance-related education can improve patient compliance with post-ESD endoscopic surveillance, in comparison to those who did not complete the compliance-related education questionnaire. Additionally, the investigators intend to investigate the factors that influence patient compliance. This study will consist of two parts. Part 1 will assess whether the completion of questionnaire and feedback on compliance-related education can improve short-term patient compliance with post-ESD endoscopic surveillance, and investigate factors influencing short-term patient compliance. Part 2 will assess whether the completion of questionnaire and feedback on compliance-related education can improve long-term patient compliance with post-ESD endoscopic surveillance, and investigate factors influencing patient compliance.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
500

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
43mo left

Started Oct 2023

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress42%
Oct 2023Dec 2029

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2023

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 6, 2023

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 23, 2023

Completed
6.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2029

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2029

Last Updated

April 8, 2025

Status Verified

April 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

6.2 years

First QC Date

October 6, 2023

Last Update Submit

April 3, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

complianceendoscopic submucosal dissectionsurveillancepost-ESD

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Part 1: short-term endoscopic surveillance compliance

    Patients who undergo their first endoscopic surveillance within 3 months after ESD are considered to have good compliance, otherwise they are considered to have poor compliance.

    From enrollment to the end of the first endoscopic surveillance (3 months)

  • Part 2: long-term endoscopic surveillance compliance

    The criteria for endoscopic surveillance after ESD in this study are as follows: (1) For patients with non-neoplastic lesions and benign tumors after ESD, a follow-up of at least 1 year is required; (2) For patients with low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and adenoma after ESD, a follow-up of at least 1 year is required; (3) For patients with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, a follow-up of at least 3 years is required, with an interval not exceeding 2 years; (4) For patients with carcinoma, a follow-up of at least 5 years is required, with an interval not exceeding 2 years. The criteria for assessing the compliance of endoscopic surveillance in this study are as follows: Patients who undergo endoscopic surveillance according to the above-mentioned criteria are considered to have good compliance, otherwise they are considered to have poor compliance.

    From enrollment to the end of the last endoscopic surveillance (1-5 years)

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Part 1: Ulcer scar rate

    From enrollment to the end of the first endoscopic surveillance (3 months)

  • Part 1: Correlated Factors for short-term endoscopic surveillance compliance

    From enrollment to the end of the first endoscopic surveillance (3 months)

  • Part 2: Incidence of metachronous lesions

    Up to 5 years

  • Part 2: Incidence of local recurrence

    Up to 5 years

  • Part 2: Overall survival rate

    5 years

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Control Arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients after ESD are informed on follow-up instructions by doctors about the follow-up requirements before discharge, and complete a questionnaire without compliance-related education.

Behavioral: Questionnaire without compliance-related education

Questionnaire Arm

EXPERIMENTAL

In addition to receiving the same follow-up instructions as the control group, patients need to complete a questionnaire on compliance-related education before discharge. Based on the responses, nurses provide feedback and guidance.

Behavioral: Questionnaire

Interventions

QuestionnaireBEHAVIORAL

Patients after ESD need to complete a questionnaire on compliance-related education before discharge. The questionnaire includes the following information: 1. General information about the patient (e.g., education level, place of residence, economic status, employment status, family history of neoplasms, whether the patient or immediate family member has a medical background, number of previous endoscopic examinations, etc.) 2. Awareness of follow-up examinations (e.g., knowledge about the timing of the first follow-up, the process of follow-up examinations, related educational issues about follow-up, etc.) 3. Awareness of the disease (self-perceived tumor is benign or malignant, whether lifestyle changes are required, etc.)

Questionnaire Arm

Patients after ESD need to complete a questionnaire without compliance-related education before discharge. The questionnaire includes only general information about the patient (e.g., education level, place of residence, economic status, employment status, family history of neoplasms, whether the patient or immediate family member has a medical background, number of previous endoscopic examinations, etc.)

Control Arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients (≥18 years) after ESD for mucosal lesions.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients after ESD for submucosal tumors, e.g. stromal tumors, neuroendocrine tumors;
  • Additional radical surgery after ESD procedure;
  • Past history of ESD procedure or local recurrence;
  • Severe comorbidities with a life expectancy of \<6 months as judged by the investigator;
  • Unable to cooperate with information collection due to mental disorders, severe neurosis, or dysgnosia;
  • Unable to understand or unwilling to sign a written informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Xijing Hospital of Digestive Disease

Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032, China

RECRUITING

Related Publications (4)

  • Ono H, Yao K, Fujishiro M, Oda I, Uedo N, Nimura S, Yahagi N, Iishi H, Oka M, Ajioka Y, Fujimoto K. Guidelines for endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer (second edition). Dig Endosc. 2021 Jan;33(1):4-20. doi: 10.1111/den.13883. Epub 2020 Dec 9.

    PMID: 33107115BACKGROUND
  • Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y, Yahagi N, Yamano H, Saito S, Hisabe T, Yao T, Watanabe M, Yoshida M, Saitoh Y, Tsuruta O, Sugihara KI, Igarashi M, Toyonaga T, Ajioka Y, Kusunoki M, Koike K, Fujimoto K, Tajiri H. Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc. 2020 Jan;32(2):219-239. doi: 10.1111/den.13545. Epub 2019 Dec 27.

    PMID: 31566804BACKGROUND
  • Ishihara R, Arima M, Iizuka T, Oyama T, Katada C, Kato M, Goda K, Goto O, Tanaka K, Yano T, Yoshinaga S, Muto M, Kawakubo H, Fujishiro M, Yoshida M, Fujimoto K, Tajiri H, Inoue H; Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society Guidelines Committee of ESD/EMR for Esophageal Cancer. Endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection guidelines for esophageal cancer. Dig Endosc. 2020 May;32(4):452-493. doi: 10.1111/den.13654.

    PMID: 32072683BACKGROUND
  • Pimentel-Nunes P, Libanio D, Bastiaansen BAJ, Bhandari P, Bisschops R, Bourke MJ, Esposito G, Lemmers A, Maselli R, Messmann H, Pech O, Pioche M, Vieth M, Weusten BLAM, van Hooft JE, Deprez PH, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastrointestinal lesions: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2022. Endoscopy. 2022 Jun;54(6):591-622. doi: 10.1055/a-1811-7025. Epub 2022 May 6.

    PMID: 35523224BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Patient Compliance

Interventions

Surveys and Questionnaires

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Patient Acceptance of Health CareTreatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Data CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • Zhiguo Liu

    Xijing Hospital of Digestive DIsease

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
associate professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 6, 2023

First Posted

October 23, 2023

Study Start

October 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2029

Last Updated

April 8, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations