ESPBs vs TAPs for Satisfactory Analgesia Following DIEP Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
102
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Breast cancer is the second most common cancer diagnosed in American women . For patients who have undergone surgical mastectomy, autologous breast reconstruction is an alternative option to breast implants. Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flaps are the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction . Effective pain control following surgery is imperative and ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane blocks (TAPs) with the infiltration of local anesthetics, such a bupivacaine are a common regional technique of choice . A newer described technique, bilateral Erector Spinae Plane blocks (ESPBs) (which also are an infiltration of local anesthetic) present as an alternative approach for post-operative analgesia. ESPBs have been proven efficacious in reducing intra- and post-operative opioid requirements, lessening the need for rescue analgesics in other similar surgical procedures. The hypothesis is that preoperative bilateral ESPBs could provide equivalent pain control as a regional analgesic for patients undergoing DIEP flap surgery when compared to preoperative bilateral TAPs
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable pain
Started Nov 2023
Longer than P75 for not_applicable pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 3, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 19, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 15, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
July 9, 2025
July 1, 2025
2.7 years
July 3, 2023
July 7, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Numerical Rating Scale
Scale used to measure pain on scale from 0-10 (0 is 'no pain' and 10 is 'the worst pain imaginable')
24 hours post injection
Mean Morphine Equivalents
Amount of opioid pain medications administered and converted to morphine equivalents
24 hours post injection
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Numerical Rating Scale
12 hours post injection
Michigan Body Map
24 hours post injection
Mean Morphine Equivalents
48 hours post injection
Numerical Rating Scale
48 hours post injection
Numerical Rating Scale
3 months post-operation
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Group 1: Erector Spinae Plane blocks
OTHERErector Spinae Plane blocks
Group 2: Transversus Abdominis Plane blocks
OTHERTransversus Abdominis Plane blocks
Interventions
After obtaining informed consent to participate in the study, patients will be randomized by a computer 50/50 to either the Erector Spinae Plane group or the Transversus Abdominus Plane group at the time of their surgical clinic visit prior to their scheduled surgery. Then on the morning of surgery, the Erector Spinae Plane group will receive a bilateral ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane peripheral nerve block. During this intervention, 0.25% bupivacaine with dexamethasone will be injected below the fascia of the erector spinae muscle group.
On the morning of surgery, the patients in the TAPs group will receive a bilateral ultrasound-guided Transversus Abdominus plane peripheral nerve block. During this intervention, 0.25% bupivacaine with dexamethasone will be injected into the transversus abdominus plane above the transversus abdominus muscle.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult women with breast cancer, ASA 1-3, undergoing DIEP flap surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Chronic opioid use contraindications to local anesthetics or regional analgesia Inability to communicate intensity of pain on a numeric analog scale
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The principal investigator will be unblinded. The study coordinator will be blinded, unable to access procedure notes and randomization assignment
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 3, 2023
First Posted
October 19, 2023
Study Start
November 1, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 15, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
July 9, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share