NCT06087081

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to find the comparative effects of mills manipulation with or without Mulligan pain release phenomena on the pain, grip strength, and function in patients with Lateral Epicondylitis. The results of this study will provide clinicians with valuable insights into the most effective treatment approach for lateral epicondylitis, enabling them to stay up-to-date with the latest practice methods and optimize patient care.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
38

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 11, 2023

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 17, 2023

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 20, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2023

Completed
21 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 20, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

March 13, 2024

Status Verified

March 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

October 11, 2023

Last Update Submit

March 12, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Lateral EpicondylitisElbowPainTennis ElbowMills ManipulationMulliganPain Release PhenomenaHand Grip StrengthElbow FunctionNPRSPRTEEHand Held Dynamometer

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Numeric Pain Rate Scale

    The NPRS for pain is a unidirectional measure of pain intensity in adults similar to the pain Visual Analogue Scale(VAS), the NPRS is anchored by terms describing pain severity extremes. The common format is a horizontal bar or line with 11-items (0-10). 0 on NPRS indicates no pain, 5 indicates moderate pain and 10 indicates worst possible pain. NPRS is easy to administer and takes less than 1minute. The NPRS can be administered verbally (on telephone) or graphically for self- completion. Reliability: high test-retest reliability (r=0.96). Validity: (0.86-0.95).

    4th Week

  • Hand Held Dynamometer

    The maximal grip strength of the affected arm was assessed using a grip-strength dynamometer. Patients were asked to grip the dynamometer as hard as possible 3 times at 10 s rest interval. Grip force should be applied smoothly without rapid jerking motion. Patient must be seated with 90 degrees of elbow flexion, shoulder adduction, slight extension in the wrist, and the forearm in the neutral position. The highest grip-strength number was registered. Reliability: high test-retest reliability(r=0.9864)

    4th Week

  • Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation

    Functional Disability was measured by PRTEE, a 15-item questionnaire designed to measure forearm pain and disability in patients with Lateral Epicondylitis. Patients have to rate their levels of tennis elbow pain and disability from 0 to 10 and consists of 2 sub-scales. There is a pain sub-scale with 5 items (0 = no pain, 50 = worst pain) and Functional sub-scale consists of Specific activities with 6 items (0 = no hinder, 60 =unable to do) and Usual activities with 4 items (0 = no difficulty, 10 = unable to do). The PRTEE was found to be a reliable, reproducible and sensitive instrument for the assessment of pain and disability in chronic lateral epicondylitis subjects (Cronbach's alpha is 0.98).

    4th Week

Study Arms (2)

Group A

EXPERIMENTAL

Baseline treatment along with Mill's manipulation

Other: Baseline Treatment along with Mill's manipulation

Group B

EXPERIMENTAL

Baseline Treatment along with Mill's manipulation and Mulligan's pain relief phenomena

Other: Baseline Treatment along with Mill's manipulation and Mulligan's pain relief phenomena

Interventions

Position the patient on a chair with a backrest and stand behind the patient. Support the patient's arm under the crook of the elbow with the shoulder joint abducted to 90° and medially rotated. The forearm will automatically fall into pronation. Place the thumb of your other hand in the web space between the patient's thumb and index finger and fully flex the patient's wrist and pronate the forearm. Move the hand supporting the crook of the elbow on to the posterior surface of the elbow joint and, while maintaining full Wrist flexion and pronation, extend the patient's elbow until you feel that all the slack Has been taken up in the tendon. Step sideways to stand behind the patient's head, Taking Care to prevent the patient from leaning away either forwards or sideways, which would reduce the tension on the tendon. Each exercise will be done 10 times for 5 sets each with a rest interval of 10 seconds in between each set for a period of 4 weeks

Group A

In addition to Group A mentioned protocols Pain release phenomenon (PRP) was delivered as well. The Pain Release Phenomenon Technique (PRPS) is a technique pioneered by Brian Mulligan for management of Pain. There are different types of Pain release Phenomenon as follows: 1. Stretch PRP: affected muscle is eccentrically contracted. 2. Contraction PRP: affected muscle is concentrically contracted. 3. Compression PRP: affected joint surfaces are compressed together. 4. Distraction PRP: affected joint surfaces are distracted away from each other. The types of PRP are performed along with pertained duration of hold time by the therapist. And always painful PRP technique is chosen for the treatment. In the present study stretch PRP technique was used which provoked pain stimuli and was maintained for 15-20 seconds. Each exercise will be done 10 times for 5 sets each with a rest interval of 10 seconds in between each set for a period of 4 weeks

Group B

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 40 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis with positive Cozen test
  • NPRS \>3
  • Both male and female patients
  • Sub-acute lateral epicondylitis \>4weeks-\<3 months
  • Subjects with age range 20-40 year

You may not qualify if:

  • Acute lateral epicondylitis
  • Subjects with elbow and around elbow fracture
  • Subjects with ligament injury around elbow joint
  • Any neurological conditions
  • Any open wounds around the area of elbow
  • Hyper-sensitive skin, skin allergies, diagnosed subjects with malignancy, diagnosed subjects skin diseases, diagnosed subjects with systemic illness
  • Traumatic injury to the elbow joint

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ittefaq Hospital Trust

Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Baker CL Jr, Murphy KP, Gottlob CA, Curd DT. Arthroscopic classification and treatment of lateral epicondylitis: two-year clinical results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000 Nov-Dec;9(6):475-82. doi: 10.1067/mse.2000.108533.

    PMID: 11155299BACKGROUND
  • Armstrong TJ, Buckle P, Fine LJ, Hagberg M, Jonsson B, Kilbom A, Kuorinka IA, Silverstein BA, Sjogaard G, Viikari-Juntura ER. A conceptual model for work-related neck and upper-limb musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1993 Apr;19(2):73-84. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1494.

    PMID: 8316782BACKGROUND
  • Ahmad Z, Siddiqui N, Malik SS, Abdus-Samee M, Tytherleigh-Strong G, Rushton N. Lateral epicondylitis: a review of pathology and management. Bone Joint J. 2013 Sep;95-B(9):1158-64. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B9.29285.

    PMID: 23997125BACKGROUND
  • Bretschneider SF, Los FS, Eygendaal D, Kuijer PPFM, van der Molen HF. Work-relatedness of lateral epicondylitis: Systematic review including meta-analysis and GRADE work-relatedness of lateral epicondylitis. Am J Ind Med. 2022 Jan;65(1):41-50. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23303. Epub 2021 Oct 21.

    PMID: 34674287BACKGROUND
  • Aldajah S, Alashram AR, Annino G, Romagnoli C, Padua E. Analgesic Effect of Extracorporeal Shock-Wave Therapy in Individuals with Lateral Epicondylitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2022 Mar 18;7(1):29. doi: 10.3390/jfmk7010029.

    PMID: 35323612BACKGROUND
  • Fahmy FS, ElAttar M, Salem HF. Hand-Grip Strength and Return to Heavy Manual Work at a Mean 5-Year Follow-up After Arthroscopic Release of Recalcitrant Lateral Epicondylitis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Feb 24;10(2):23259671221078586. doi: 10.1177/23259671221078586. eCollection 2022 Feb.

    PMID: 35252465BACKGROUND
  • 8. Chintamani R. Effect of Mulligan's Pain Release Phenomenon on Ted in Subjects with Subacute Lateral Epicondylitis. Journal of Complementary and Alternative Medical Research. 2021;16(4):59-70.

    BACKGROUND
  • 1. Runge F. Zur genese und behandlung des schreibekrampfes. Berl Klin Wochenschr. 1873;10(1):245-8.

    BACKGROUND
  • 9. Sahu RK. A Comparative Study of Effectiveness of Mulligan's Mobilisation with Movement and Cyriax Deep Transverse Friction along with Mill's Manipulation in Individuals with Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis. 2020.

    BACKGROUND
  • 10. Memon AG, Latif FA, Sanaullah M, Hussain MI, Irum S, Rehman FU. Prevalence of lateral epicondylitis among restaurant chefs with low level of serum Vitamin D. Rawal Medical Journal. 2023;48(2):422-.

    BACKGROUND
  • 11. Zami MDZ, Pristianto A, Nasrullah N. The Effectiveness of Mulligan Mobilization With Movement (MWM) in Lateral Epicondylitis: a Critical Review. FISIO MU: Physiotherapy Evidences. 2023;4(1).

    BACKGROUND
  • 12. Rahman H, Chaturvedi PA, Apparao P, Srithulasi PR. Effectiveness of mulligan mobilisation with movement compared to supervised exercise program in subjects with lateral epicondylitis. Int J Physiotherapy Res. 2016;4(2):1394-400.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Tennis ElbowPain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Elbow TendinopathyTendinopathyMuscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesElbow InjuriesArm InjuriesWounds and InjuriesTendon InjuriesNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Humera Mubashar, MS

    Riphah International University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 11, 2023

First Posted

October 17, 2023

Study Start

October 20, 2023

Primary Completion

December 30, 2023

Study Completion

January 20, 2024

Last Updated

March 13, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations