Erector Spinae vs. PENG Block for Total Hip Arthroplasty
Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) vs. PENG Block for Pain Management and Stress Response in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Prospective, Randomized Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Effect of PENG block and ESPB on pain management, and NLR and PLR following knee arthroplasty
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Oct 2023
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 24, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 16, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 17, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 11, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 11, 2024
CompletedJune 18, 2024
June 1, 2024
8 months
May 24, 2023
June 17, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Opioid consumption
Total opiate consumption after surgery
48 hours after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (13)
first need of opiate
48 hours after procedure
Numerical Rating Scale [range 0:10]
4 hours after surgery
Numerical Rating Scale [range 0:10]
8 hours after surgery
Numerical Rating Scale [range 0:10]
12 hours after surgery
Numerical Rating Scale [range 0:10]
18 hours after surgery
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
PENG Block group
ACTIVE COMPARATORultrasound guided PENG block - 20ml 0,2% ropivacaine
ESPB group
ACTIVE COMPARATORultrasound guided erector spinae plane block - 20ml 0,2% ropivacaine
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATOROnly spinal anesthesia - No peripheral nerve block
Interventions
ultrasound guided ESPB - L4 level, unilateral
ultrasound guided PENG block
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with ASA classification I-III, Aged 20-90 years, Who will be scheduled for hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have a history of bleeding diathesis, Take anticoagulant therapy, have a History of chronic pain before surgery, have Multiple trauma, cannot assess their pain (dementia), have been operated on under general anesthesia, have an infection in the area and do not accept the procedure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Poznan, Poznań, 61-701, Poland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Małgorzata Domagalska, Ph.D.
Poznań University of Medical Sciences
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 24, 2023
First Posted
October 16, 2023
Study Start
October 17, 2023
Primary Completion
June 11, 2024
Study Completion
June 11, 2024
Last Updated
June 18, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share