Evaluation of the Clinical Evolution of Breast Increase Using Prostheses
1 other identifier
interventional
60
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The breasts are paired, superficial organs with relative symmetry. They particularly characterize femininity as an erogenous area, in addition to playing an extremely important role in a woman's body aesthetics. Breast augmentation surgery aims to add volume or restore breast volume lost post-pregnancy or weight loss, often establishing a balance in the body silhouette and increasing self-esteem. Breast implants cause an inflammatory reaction with the consequent formation of a fibrous capsule around the implant, which can evolve with different degrees of contraction. Different factors are involved with the formation and intensity of the peri-prosthetic capsule: presence of hematoma, sub-clinical infection, silicone leakage, type of prosthetic envelope, plane/site of prosthesis placement, immune response, among others. The involvement of the envelope texture proved to be a major factor in reducing the formation of capsular contracture, which was clearly evident when covering with polyurethane foam was used. It is estimated that this reduction is due to the three-dimensional structure obtained with this configuration, which would result in a smaller vector resultant of contraction of the capsular fibers. Aiming to obtain less capsular contracture, a silicone prosthesis with a velvet/silicone foam envelope was developed, which theoretically would have the advantage of the velvet/foam structure similar to polyurethane without, however, presenting negative aspects such as degradation, inflammation and eventual toxicity of catabolites. In this way, it is expected to prove the best postoperative evolution regarding the use of silicone prostheses with velvet/silicone foam coverage, highlighting the maintenance of the breast position over time. Furthermore, to intend to verify whether the velvet/silicone foam coverage determines a lower incidence of capsular contracture compared to the textured envelope. To this end, evaluation will be carried out through clinical examination and evaluation of digital photographic images taken pre-operatively, 30, 120, and 360 days post-operatively. After a long postoperative period (approximately 9 years), a late follow-up will be carried out with the patients with clinical evaluation and a satisfaction questionnaire.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 3, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 12, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2024
CompletedOctober 12, 2023
October 1, 2023
3.3 years
October 3, 2023
October 9, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of Adverse Events
Evaluate the possible occurrence of capsular contracture, maintenance of the position of the prosthesis and shape of the breasts postoperatively at 30, 120 and 360 days. Through clinical examination and standardized photographic documentation.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of prostheses (8-9 years)
8-9 years
Study Arms (2)
Group A - group with textured envelope
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup A - group with textured envelope
Group B - group with velvet/silicone foam envelope
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup B - group with velvet/silicone foam envelope
Interventions
The surgery is performed through an incision (4 cm) in the inframammary fold and displacement in the supra-muscular plane, creation of a pocket for the inclusion of the prosthesis, followed by strict hemostasis and washing with an antibiotic solution. Placement of the prosthesis by digital maneuver and closure in layers using absorbable synthetic 4-0 polycaprolactone suture. Afterwards, an occlusive dressing is applied to the surgical wound. IV antibiotics (cephalosporin) 1g are administered at the beginning of surgery, followed by repeat/booster doses every 6 hours in the first 24 hours. Analgesic and anti-inflammatory medications are administered, varying according to each patient's restrictions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- who present complaints of hypomastia of different etiologies (constitutional hypotrophy, post-weight loss, post-breastfeeding
You may not qualify if:
- who have already had a prosthesis included before the clinical study and/or for prosthesis exchange
- with sequelae of mastectomy with loss of architecture of the breast region and requiring additional surgeries (flaps, grafts)
- with decompensated chronic disease
- pregnant or postpartum women
- minors, vulnerable with mental problems
- patients who have breast ptosis and require mastopexy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Lifesillead
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Paulo Kharmandayan, PhD
University of Campinas, Brazil
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 3, 2023
First Posted
October 12, 2023
Study Start
May 1, 2014
Primary Completion
July 31, 2017
Study Completion
May 30, 2024
Last Updated
October 12, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share