Study Stopped
There was no indication that long-term follow-up would differ between any of the studies that have evaluated devices within the 410 Style Matrix.
Safety and Effectiveness of NATRELLE® 410 Highly Cohesive, Anatomically Shaped, Silicone-filled X-Style and L-Style Breast Implants
A Prospective Multicenter Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of NATRELLE® 410 Highly Cohesive Anatomically Shaped Silicone-filled X-style and L-style Breast Implants
1 other identifier
interventional
355
1 country
29
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, multicenter study of the safety and effectiveness of NATRELLE® 410 Highly Cohesive, Anatomically Shaped, Silicone-Filled X-Style and L-Style Breast Implants.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
29 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 10, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 14, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 6, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 25, 2020
CompletedJune 25, 2020
June 1, 2020
3 years
January 14, 2013
May 13, 2020
June 23, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Percentage of Participants According to Investigator Satisfaction With Implants
The investigator rated their satisfaction with the participant's breast implant for each breast on a 5-point scale (1=Definitely dissatisfied, 2=Somewhat dissatisfied,3=Neither satisfied or dissatisfied, 4=Somewhat satisfied, 5=Definitely satisfied). If there was a different response for the left and right breasts the worst response was used. The percentage of participants where the investigator responded: "Definitely satisfied" or "Somewhat satisfied" is reported.
3 years (followup after implantation that occurred between 07 July 2009 and 01 January 2012)
Percentage of Participants According to Participant Satisfaction With Implants
The participant rated their satisfaction with the breast implant for each breast on a 5-point scale (1=Definitely dissatisfied, 2=Somewhat dissatisfied, 3=Neither satisfied or dissatisfied, 4=Somewhat satisfied, 5=Definitely satisfied). If there was a different response for the left and right breasts the worst response was used. The percentage of participants who responded: "Definitely satisfied" or "Somewhat satisfied" is reported.
3 years (followup after implantation that occurred between 07 July 2009 and 01 January 2012)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Percentage of Participants With Local Complications
5 years (followup after implantation that occurred between 07 July 2009 and 01 January 2012)
Percentage of Participants With Reoperations
5 years (followup after implantation that occurred between 07 July 2009 and 01 January 2012)
Percentage of Participants With Implant Removal With or Without Replacement
5 years (followup after implantation that occurred between 07 July 2009 and 01 January 2012)
Study Arms (4)
Augmentation
EXPERIMENTALWomen who had breast augmentation with NATRELLE® 410 implants.
Reconstruction
EXPERIMENTALWomen who had breast reconstruction with NATRELLE® 410 implants.
Revision-Augmentation
EXPERIMENTALWomen who had revision of a previous breast augmentation with NATRELLE® 410 implants.
Revision-Reconstruction
EXPERIMENTALWomen who had revision of a previous breast reconstruction with NATRELLE® 410 implants.
Interventions
Surgical implant
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female, age 18 or older
- Present with 1 or more of the following conditions:
- Primary breast augmentation (i.e., no previous breast implant surgery) indicated for subject dissatisfaction with size or shape of breast (e.g., mammary hypoplasia), asymmetry, ptosis, or aplasia
- Primary breast reconstruction (i.e., no previous breast implant surgery other than implantation of tissue expanders or contralateral augmentation for asymmetry) indicated, in the affected breast, for mastectomy for cancer, prophylactic mastectomy, or breast trauma (resulting in mastectomy) and for the unaffected breast, contralateral asymmetry (may be performed on the date of the mastectomy or the date when the permanent implants are placed in the reconstructed breast)
- Breast implant revision surgery (i.e., removal and replacement of breast implants) indicated for previous augmentation or reconstruction with silicone-filled or saline-filled breast implants
- Has adequate tissue available to cover implants
- Willing to undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the specified follow-up visits for subjects at MRI designated sites and be eligible for MRI (e.g., no implanted metal or metal devices, no history of severe claustrophobia)
You may not qualify if:
- Does not have advance fibrocystic disease considered to be premalignant without accompanying subcutaneous mastectomy
- Does not have existing carcinoma of the breast, without mastectomy
- Does not have abscess or infection in the body at the time of enrollment
- Is not pregnant or nursing
- Does not have any disease, including uncontrolled diabetes (e.g., hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) \> 8%), that is clinically known to impact wound healing ability
- Does not show tissue characteristics that are clinically incompatible with mammaplasty, such as tissue damage resulting from radiation inadequate tissue, compromised vascularity, or ulceration
- Does not have or is under treatment for any condition that may constitute an unwarranted surgical risk (e.g., unstable cardiac or pulmonary problems)
- Does not show psychological characteristics that may be incompatible with the surgical procedure and the prosthesis, such as inappropriate attitude or motivation (e.g., body dysmorphic disorder)
- Is not willing to undergo further surgery for revision, if medically required
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Allerganlead
Study Sites (29)
Laurence Berkowitz
Campbell, California, 95008, United States
Roy Hong
Palo Alto, California, 94301, United States
Eric Bachelor
Pleasanton, California, 94566, United States
Gregory Liebscher
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80919, United States
Scott Spear
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007, United States
Calvin Peters
Orlando, Florida, 32801, United States
Walter Erhardt
Albany, Georgia, 31701, United States
James Namnoum
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342, United States
Janet Turkle
Carmel, Indiana, 46032, United States
Julene Samuels
Louisville, Kentucky, 40205, United States
Timothy Mickel
Monroe, Louisiana, 71201, United States
John Renucci
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503, United States
Steven Morris
Midland, Michigan, 48640, United States
Charles Nathan
Chesterfield, Missouri, 63005, United States
Herluf Jr. Lund
Chesterfield, Missouri, 63005, United States
Patricia McGuire
Creve Coeur, Missouri, 63141, United States
Perry Johnson
Omaha, Nebraska, 68118, United States
Peter Hyans
Berkeley Heights, New Jersey, 07922, United States
Peter Hetzler
Little Silver, New Jersey, 07739, United States
Caroline Glicksman
Sea Girt, New Jersey, 08750, United States
Tracy Pfeifer
Great Neck, New York, 10028, United States
Lloyd Gayle
New York, New York, 10021, United States
Raymond Isakov
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Craig Colville
Toledo, Ohio, 43615, United States
Frank Barone
Toledo, Ohio, 43623, United States
Mary Gingrass
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203, United States
Patrick Maxwell
Nashville, Tennessee, 37212, United States
Jeffrey Friedman
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Thomas Blanchard
Newport News, Virginia, 23606, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Therapeutic Area, Head
- Organization
- Allergan
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Andrew Schumacher
Allergan
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 14, 2013
First Posted
February 6, 2013
Study Start
December 10, 2012
Primary Completion
November 30, 2015
Study Completion
November 30, 2015
Last Updated
June 25, 2020
Results First Posted
June 25, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06