Volume Versus Pressure Ventilation on Lung Atelectasis
The Effect of Volume Controlled Versus Pressure Ventilation on Anesthesia Induced Lung Atelectasis in Pediatrics Using Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA )During Cardiac Catheterization. A Prospective Randomized Study.
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This prospective randomized comparative study, to assess post-operative lung atelectasis by comparing calculated lung score using ultrasound between pediatric patients intubated with LMA (laryngeal mask airway) under volume versus pressure controlled modes of ventilation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 27, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 10, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 12, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2024
CompletedJanuary 17, 2024
January 1, 2024
6 months
September 27, 2023
January 14, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Post operative incidence of Lung atelectasis immediate post-removal of LMA.
calculate lung score using lung ultrasound
immediated post removal of LMA
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Correlation between lung score and PaO2 /FiO2 ratio
From the preoperative period (T0) to 30 minutes post-extubation
Study Arms (2)
Group A pressure control ventilation
EXPERIMENTALInspiratory pressure was adjusted to achieve an expired tidal volume of 7 ml/Kg, respiratory rate was adjusted to achieve an end ETCO2 at 32-35 mmHg, inspiratory to expiratory ratio at 1:2, PEEP at 4 cm H2O and FiO2 at 0.5 providing that the maximum airway pressure was limited to 25 cmH2O.
Group B volume control ventilation
EXPERIMENTALVT adjacent to 7 ml/Kg, respiratory rate was adjusted to achieve an end ETCO2 at 32-35 mmHg and I/E at: 1:2 and PEEP at 4 cm H2O and FiO2 at 0.5.
Interventions
Pressure controlled versus Volume controlled ventilation using LMA
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization procedures. Age from 2 years to 6 years of both sexes.
You may not qualify if:
- Lung score at different times.
- Age \<2 years and \>6 years.
- Preoperative mechanical ventilation.
- Heart failure (any inotropic support infusion).
- Patients with any lung diseases( acute respiratory disease, pulmonary or lung
- diseases).
- Lung consolidation score ≥ 2 before insertion of LMA.
- Any contraindication for LMA insertion (risk for aspiration, and/or airway
- obstruction below the larynx.)
- Procedures exceeding 120 mins duration.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dalia Saad
Cairo, Egypt
Related Publications (6)
Hedenstierna G. Airway closure, atelectasis and gas exchange during anaesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol. 2002 May;68(5):332-6.
PMID: 12029240BACKGROUNDStefanik E, Drewnowska O, Lisowska B, Turek B. Causes, Effects and Methods of Monitoring Gas Exchange Disturbances during Equine General Anaesthesia. Animals (Basel). 2021 Jul 9;11(7):2049. doi: 10.3390/ani11072049.
PMID: 34359177BACKGROUNDChiumello D, Mongodi S, Algieri I, Vergani GL, Orlando A, Via G, Crimella F, Cressoni M, Mojoli F. Assessment of Lung Aeration and Recruitment by CT Scan and Ultrasound in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients. Crit Care Med. 2018 Nov;46(11):1761-1768. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003340.
PMID: 30048331BACKGROUNDRodriguez-Fanjul J, Corsini I, Orti CS, Bobillo-Perez S, Raimondi F. Lung ultrasound to evaluate lung recruitment in neonates with respiratory distress (RELUS study). Pediatr Pulmonol. 2022 Oct;57(10):2502-2510. doi: 10.1002/ppul.26066. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
PMID: 35792663BACKGROUNDLi X, Liu B, Wang Y, Xiong W, Zhang Y, Bao D, Liang Y, Li L, Liu G, Jin X. The effects of laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube on atelectasis in patients undergoing general anesthesia assessed by lung ultrasound: A protocol for a prospective, randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2022 Sep 9;17(9):e0273410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273410. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 36084154BACKGROUNDAcosta CM, Maidana GA, Jacovitti D, Belaunzaran A, Cereceda S, Rae E, Molina A, Gonorazky S, Bohm SH, Tusman G. Accuracy of transthoracic lung ultrasound for diagnosing anesthesia-induced atelectasis in children. Anesthesiology. 2014 Jun;120(6):1370-9. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000231.
PMID: 24662376BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Amel Hanfy Abo El- Ela
Kasr El Aini Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Patients will be randomly allocated by a computer-generated list (www.randomization.com) into one of the study groups in the day of the study . The randomization sequence will be concealed in sealed envelopes and will be opened by an independent nurse. The data collector and data analysis will be blind to group assignments.
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 27, 2023
First Posted
October 10, 2023
Study Start
January 12, 2024
Primary Completion
July 1, 2024
Study Completion
August 1, 2024
Last Updated
January 17, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share