NCT06076395

Brief Summary

This prospective randomized comparative study, to assess post-operative lung atelectasis by comparing calculated lung score using ultrasound between pediatric patients intubated with LMA (laryngeal mask airway) under volume versus pressure controlled modes of ventilation.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 27, 2023

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 10, 2023

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 12, 2024

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

January 17, 2024

Status Verified

January 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

September 27, 2023

Last Update Submit

January 14, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

pediatric cardiac catheterizationlung ultrasound scorelung atelectasisLMA

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Post operative incidence of Lung atelectasis immediate post-removal of LMA.

    calculate lung score using lung ultrasound

    immediated post removal of LMA

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Correlation between lung score and PaO2 /FiO2 ratio

    From the preoperative period (T0) to 30 minutes post-extubation

Study Arms (2)

Group A pressure control ventilation

EXPERIMENTAL

Inspiratory pressure was adjusted to achieve an expired tidal volume of 7 ml/Kg, respiratory rate was adjusted to achieve an end ETCO2 at 32-35 mmHg, inspiratory to expiratory ratio at 1:2, PEEP at 4 cm H2O and FiO2 at 0.5 providing that the maximum airway pressure was limited to 25 cmH2O.

Device: LMA (Laryngeal Mask Airway)

Group B volume control ventilation

EXPERIMENTAL

VT adjacent to 7 ml/Kg, respiratory rate was adjusted to achieve an end ETCO2 at 32-35 mmHg and I/E at: 1:2 and PEEP at 4 cm H2O and FiO2 at 0.5.

Device: LMA (Laryngeal Mask Airway)

Interventions

Pressure controlled versus Volume controlled ventilation using LMA

Also known as: Lung Ultrasound
Group A pressure control ventilationGroup B volume control ventilation

Eligibility Criteria

Age2 Years - 6 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization procedures. Age from 2 years to 6 years of both sexes.

You may not qualify if:

  • Lung score at different times.
  • Age \<2 years and \>6 years.
  • Preoperative mechanical ventilation.
  • Heart failure (any inotropic support infusion).
  • Patients with any lung diseases( acute respiratory disease, pulmonary or lung
  • diseases).
  • Lung consolidation score ≥ 2 before insertion of LMA.
  • Any contraindication for LMA insertion (risk for aspiration, and/or airway
  • obstruction below the larynx.)
  • Procedures exceeding 120 mins duration.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dalia Saad

Cairo, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Hedenstierna G. Airway closure, atelectasis and gas exchange during anaesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol. 2002 May;68(5):332-6.

    PMID: 12029240BACKGROUND
  • Stefanik E, Drewnowska O, Lisowska B, Turek B. Causes, Effects and Methods of Monitoring Gas Exchange Disturbances during Equine General Anaesthesia. Animals (Basel). 2021 Jul 9;11(7):2049. doi: 10.3390/ani11072049.

    PMID: 34359177BACKGROUND
  • Chiumello D, Mongodi S, Algieri I, Vergani GL, Orlando A, Via G, Crimella F, Cressoni M, Mojoli F. Assessment of Lung Aeration and Recruitment by CT Scan and Ultrasound in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients. Crit Care Med. 2018 Nov;46(11):1761-1768. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003340.

    PMID: 30048331BACKGROUND
  • Rodriguez-Fanjul J, Corsini I, Orti CS, Bobillo-Perez S, Raimondi F. Lung ultrasound to evaluate lung recruitment in neonates with respiratory distress (RELUS study). Pediatr Pulmonol. 2022 Oct;57(10):2502-2510. doi: 10.1002/ppul.26066. Epub 2022 Jul 12.

    PMID: 35792663BACKGROUND
  • Li X, Liu B, Wang Y, Xiong W, Zhang Y, Bao D, Liang Y, Li L, Liu G, Jin X. The effects of laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube on atelectasis in patients undergoing general anesthesia assessed by lung ultrasound: A protocol for a prospective, randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2022 Sep 9;17(9):e0273410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273410. eCollection 2022.

    PMID: 36084154BACKGROUND
  • Acosta CM, Maidana GA, Jacovitti D, Belaunzaran A, Cereceda S, Rae E, Molina A, Gonorazky S, Bohm SH, Tusman G. Accuracy of transthoracic lung ultrasound for diagnosing anesthesia-induced atelectasis in children. Anesthesiology. 2014 Jun;120(6):1370-9. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000231.

    PMID: 24662376BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart Defects, Congenital

Interventions

Laryngeal Masks

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cardiovascular AbnormalitiesCardiovascular DiseasesHeart DiseasesCongenital AbnormalitiesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intubation, IntratrachealAirway ManagementTherapeuticsIntubationInvestigative TechniquesMasksProtective DevicesEquipment and SuppliesPersonal Protective EquipmentManufactured MaterialsTechnology, Industry, and Agriculture

Study Officials

  • Amel Hanfy Abo El- Ela

    Kasr El Aini Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Patients will be randomly allocated by a computer-generated list (www.randomization.com) into one of the study groups in the day of the study . The randomization sequence will be concealed in sealed envelopes and will be opened by an independent nurse. The data collector and data analysis will be blind to group assignments.
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: For group A pressure control ventilation will be adjusted as follows: Inspiratory pressure will be adjusted to achieve an expired tidal volume of 7 ml/Kg, respiratory rate will be adjusted to achieve an end ETCO2 at 32-35 mmHg, inspiratory to expiratory ratio at 1:2, PEEP at 4 cm H 2 O and FiO2 at 0.5 providing that the maximum airway pressure will be limited to 25 cmH2O. For group B volume control ventilation will be adjusted as follows: tidal volume (VT) adjacent to 7 ml/Kg, respiratory rate will be adjusted to achieve an end ETCO2 at 32-35 mmHg and I/E at: 1:2 and positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP)at 4 cmH2O and FiO2 at 0.5.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
assistant professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 27, 2023

First Posted

October 10, 2023

Study Start

January 12, 2024

Primary Completion

July 1, 2024

Study Completion

August 1, 2024

Last Updated

January 17, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations