NCT06070714

Brief Summary

This is a prospective randomized controlled trial designed to assess the efficacy and safety of Lumenis® Pulse™ P120H holmium laser system with the Moses technology (holmium laser with pulse modulation) versus the Soltive™ SuperPulsed Laser System with the thulium fiber laser (thulium fiber laser), in dusting of renal stones during ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy. 310 participants will be enrolled across 5 research sites.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
178

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 7, 2023

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 2, 2023

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 6, 2023

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 31, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 31, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 27, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

February 27, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

October 2, 2023

Results QC Date

December 18, 2025

Last Update Submit

February 25, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Stone Free Rate

    The primary objective of this study is to compare the stone free rate as determined by ultra-low dose limited renal CT at 2 months post operatively between the holmium laser with pulse modulation and the thulium fiber laser.

    Post-operative (up to 10 weeks)

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Stone Treatment Time in Minutes

    day of procedure (up to 3 hours)

  • Procedural Time

    day of procedure (up to 3 hours)

  • Total Energy Used in Kilojoules

    day of procedure (up to 3 hours)

  • Number of Participants With Complications

    day of procedure (up to 10 weeks)

  • Participant Quality of Life as Measured by the WISQOL Short Form Score Pre-procedure Assessment

    before the procedure (up to 3 hours before procedures)

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Holmium laser with pulse modulation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Device: Holmium laser with pulse modulation

Thulium fiber laser

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Device: Thulium fiber laser

Interventions

The holmium laser with pulse modulation emits two separate laser pulses with a short time interval between them. The first pulse divides the water between the laser fiber tip and the stone and the second pulse hits the stone unobstructed.

Holmium laser with pulse modulation

The thulium fiber laser has a different wavelength then the holmium laser with pulse modulation and thus has slightly different energy properties. It has also been shown to increase ablative volume and decrease retropulsion without any safety concerns.

Thulium fiber laser

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 89 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with renal stones who require endoscopic laser treatment in the outpatient operating room. Patients may have an ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) stone if the treatment of the stone is completed in the kidney.
  • Patients' stone size in a single renal unit of greater than or equal to 5 millimeters (mm) and less than or equal to 20 mm. Stone size is defined as the largest diameter of a single stone on pre-operative CT as assessed by the urologist. Patients with multiple stones will be included as long as their largest stone size falls within the above parameters.

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant patients
  • Patients with transplant kidneys or other anatomic variations: horseshoe kidney, pelvic kidney, ptotic kidney, urinary diversion or ureteral stricture
  • Patients with irreversible coagulopathy
  • Patients with known ureteral stricture disease
  • Patient who do not have a pre-operative CT
  • Non-English speaking patients and patients in other vulnerable groups such as lacking of decision-making capability, prisoner, or adult unable to consent
  • Uric acid composition greater than 50 percent on pre operative stone analysis. Patients will be excluded post operatively if stone analysis from the time of surgery is greater than 50 percent uric acid.
  • Prior ureteroscopy within 6 weeks of current surgery
  • Urothelial tumor(s), direct extraction of the stone(s) without needing laser lithotripsy, and failure to reach the stone in the upper urinary tract with the ureteroscope
  • Patients with only ureteral stones (ureteropelvic junction stones may be included as long as treated in the kidney)
  • Patients with renal tubular acidosis or medullary sponge kidney

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

University of California - Los Angeles

Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States

Location

Mount Sinai Health System

New York, New York, 10029, United States

Location

Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute

Cleveland, Ohio, 44125, United States

Location

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

Madison, Wisconsin, 57392, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Nephrolithiasis

Interventions

Lasers, Solid-State

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Kidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesUrolithiasisMale Urogenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

LasersOptical DevicesEquipment and SuppliesRadiation Equipment and Supplies

Results Point of Contact

Title
Stephen Nakada
Organization
University of Wisconsin

Study Officials

  • Stephen Nakada, MD, FACS, FRCS

    University of Wisconsin, Madison

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
A single urologist will evaluate all CT scans for residual stones and will be blinded to which laser was used during ureteroscopy.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants will be randomized (ratio 1:1) to be treated with either the holmium laser with pulse modulation or the thulium fiber laser. Each site will randomize their own participants. Block randomization in block sizes of 4 will be used to assign participants to each laser treatment group. If unable to use the specified laser for any reason, the participant will be considered a withdrawal
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 2, 2023

First Posted

October 6, 2023

Study Start

September 7, 2023

Primary Completion

October 31, 2025

Study Completion

October 31, 2025

Last Updated

February 27, 2026

Results First Posted

February 27, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations