NCT05697341

Brief Summary

Nephrolithiasis is the third most common disease of the urinary tract. As minimally invasive technologies develop, shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) are different surgeries to treat renal stones. Aim of the Study is to compare results, safety and outcome of Ultra mini PCNL versus stented extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) for the management of renal calculi from 10 - 20 mm. Patients were randomized to either Ultra-Mini-Percutaneous nephrolithotomy group or stented SWL group via the closed envelope method. Patient data was collected preoperatively, immediately postoperatively and 2 and 4 weeks postoperatively to assess operative time, hospital stay, complications regarding fever, hematuria and need for blood transfusion, residual stones and need for retreatment.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2021

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2022

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2022

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 13, 2023

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 25, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

January 25, 2023

Status Verified

January 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

January 13, 2023

Last Update Submit

January 23, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

NephrolithiasisUltra-Mini-PCNLStented SWL

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Stone-free status

    The complete stone clearance or presence of clinically insignificant residual fragments (\<4 mm) 2 or 4 weeks after the final procedure was regarded as stone-free

    at 2 or 4 weeks after ultra-mini-PCNL or stented SWL

Study Arms (2)

Ultra-Mini-PCNL Group (A)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In The Ultra-Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy group, a 5 Fr open-ended ureteral catheter was introduced and a retrograde pyelogram was performed in the Lithotomy position after the induction of general anesthesia. Patients were then repositioned to the prone position. Ultra-mini-PCNLs were done in a prone position by a single consultant. The desired calyx was punctured with a Cook diamond tip 18G puncture needle under fluoroscopy guidance using standard bull's eye technique. Single tract dilatation with One Step Dilator (11Fr), with central channel for guide wires with its Operating Sheath (Storzz Dilator and Operating Sheaths for MIP XS) under fluoroscopy guidance. Storzz Nephroscope for MIP XS / S along with Swiss Lithoclast master pneumatic lithotripter with 1/0.8 mm probe was used for stone fragmentation. Stone fragments are flushed out on rapid removal of the endoscope, due to a 'vortex' effect and with wash through the operating sheath using a 6 Fr. nelaton catheter.

Procedure: Ultra-Mini-PCNL

Stented SWL Group (B)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In the stented ESWL group, a 5 Fr open-ended ureteral catheter was introduced in the renal pelvis, and a retrograde pyelogram was performed in the Lithotomy position after the induction of general anathesia. JJ is applied either 5-26 or 5-28 accorging to the patient. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy ESWL was administered with an electromagnetic shockwave lithotripter (Siemens electromagnetic lithotripters devices). Patients were positioned supine with the shock head from the back. Fluoroscopy was used for the localization and monitoring of stone fragmentation. All patients received shocks at a frequency of 60/min. An average of approximately 2500-3000 shocks was targeted in all patients.

Procedure: Stented SWL

Interventions

treatment to extract or disintegrate renal stones

Ultra-Mini-PCNL Group (A)
Stented SWLPROCEDURE

treatment to disintegrate renal stones in the presence of a JJ

Stented SWL Group (B)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • patients between 18 and 60 years
  • complaining of radioopaque renal stones ranging from 10-20 mm.
  • BMI not exceeding 40

You may not qualify if:

  • radiolucent stones,
  • smaller than 10 mm or larger than 20 mm stones
  • congenital renal anomalies or spinal deformity
  • BMI exceeding 40.
  • Patients with uncorrected bleeding diathesis
  • pregnant females
  • untreated UTI.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ain Shams University, Faculty of medicine

Cairo, Abbassia, 1181, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Skolarikos A, Straub M, Knoll T, Sarica K, Seitz C, Petrik A, Turk C. Metabolic evaluation and recurrence prevention for urinary stone patients: EAU guidelines. Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):750-63. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.029. Epub 2014 Nov 20.

    PMID: 25454613BACKGROUND
  • Kim CH, Chung DY, Rha KH, Lee JY, Lee SH. Effectiveness of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Renal Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Dec 30;57(1):26. doi: 10.3390/medicina57010026.

    PMID: 33396839BACKGROUND
  • Gao XS, Liao BH, Chen YT, Feng SJ, Gao R, Luo DY, Liu JM, Wang KJ. Different Tract Sizes of Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol. 2017 Nov;31(11):1101-1110. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0547. Epub 2017 Oct 30.

    PMID: 28950716BACKGROUND
  • Bozzini G, Verze P, Arcaniolo D, Dal Piaz O, Buffi NM, Guazzoni G, Provenzano M, Osmolorskij B, Sanguedolce F, Montanari E, Macchione N, Pummer K, Mirone V, De Sio M, Taverna G. A prospective randomized comparison among SWL, PCNL and RIRS for lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm: a multicenter experience : A better understanding on the treatment options for lower pole stones. World J Urol. 2017 Dec;35(12):1967-1975. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2084-7. Epub 2017 Sep 5.

    PMID: 28875295BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Nephrolithiasis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Kidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesUrolithiasisMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Ahmed Radwan, MD

    Assisstant Professof of Urology, Faculty of medicine, Ain Shams University

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: 90 Patients were enrolled from the outpatient urology clinic of Ain Shams University hospital (Demredash Hospital) randomized to either Group A Ultra-Mini-Percutaneous nephrolithotomy group or Group B stented SWL group via the closed envelope method.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Lecturer of Urology, Faculty of medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2023

First Posted

January 25, 2023

Study Start

March 1, 2021

Primary Completion

March 1, 2022

Study Completion

June 1, 2022

Last Updated

January 25, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations