On-pump Versus Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting , Short Term Outcomes , Sohag Experience
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Coronary artery disease (CAD) and its sequlae, such as myocardial infarction, arrhythmia and heart failure, are among the leading causes of death around the world . the durable role of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the treatment of CAD has long been shown. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a commonly performed surgical procedure for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), CABG can be performed using either the on-pump or off-pump technique, each with its own advantages and limitations. On-pump CABG involves the use of CPB which as agold standard for surgical coronary revascularization has led toexcellent results in mortality and complications. On-pump CABG allows the surgeon to temporarily stop the heart and provide perfusion and oxygenation to the body. This technique provides a bloodless and motionless operative field, allowing for precise graft anastomosis. However, the use of CPB is associated with deleterious effects as systemic inflammatory response, hemodilution, and organ dysfunction as dysrhythmia and neurocognitive problems. These factors may adversely affect patients lives specially those with impaired EF, who already have compromised cardiovascular function. Another technique for CABG is on-pump beating heart CABG (ONBH-CABG) surgery that is relatively novel hybrid approach to coronary artery grafting which aims to stabilize hemodynamic parameters during the operative period. This has specific benefits such as reduced preload alongside the afterload which decreases the oxygen demand of the myocardial tissue
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
Started Jul 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 10, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 6, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 10, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 10, 2024
CompletedOctober 6, 2023
October 1, 2023
1 year
September 13, 2023
October 3, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
comparison to declare the rate of morbidity and mortality using both techniques on pump and off pump in CABG and which is better in short term outcomes
which is better in morbidity and mortality, on pump or off pump CABG specially in patients with low ejection fraction (less than 40%)
1 year
Study Arms (2)
on pump CABG
ACTIVE COMPARATORusing cardiopulmonary bypass
off pump CABG
ACTIVE COMPARATORwithout cardiopulmonary bypass
Interventions
comparison between onpump and off pump CABG
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- fair and impaired EF
You may not qualify if:
- malignancy
- COPD
- renal failure on dialysis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sohag Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Sohag university Hospital
Sohag, Egypt
Related Publications (4)
Lamy A, Devereaux PJ, Prabhakaran D, Taggart DP, Hu S, Paolasso E, Straka Z, Piegas LS, Akar AR, Jain AR, Noiseux N, Padmanabhan C, Bahamondes JC, Novick RJ, Vaijyanath P, Reddy S, Tao L, Olavegogeascoechea PA, Airan B, Sulling TA, Whitlock RP, Ou Y, Ng J, Chrolavicius S, Yusuf S; CORONARY Investigators. Off-pump or on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting at 30 days. N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 19;366(16):1489-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200388. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
PMID: 22449296BACKGROUNDAscione R, Narayan P, Rogers CA, Lim KH, Capoun R, Angelini GD. Early and midterm clinical outcome in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction undergoing coronary artery surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Sep;76(3):793-9. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)00664-7.
PMID: 12963202BACKGROUNDUeki C, Miyata H, Motomura N, Sakaguchi G, Akimoto T, Takamoto S. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Apr;151(4):1092-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.11.023. Epub 2015 Nov 22.
PMID: 26725715BACKGROUNDShroyer AL, Hattler B, Wagner TH, Collins JF, Baltz JH, Quin JA, Almassi GH, Kozora E, Bakaeen F, Cleveland JC Jr, Bishawi M, Grover FL; Veterans Affairs ROOBY-FS Group. Five-Year Outcomes after On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass. N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):623-632. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614341.
PMID: 28813218BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
ayman M abdel gaffar
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- assistant lecturer cardithoracic surgery sohag university
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2023
First Posted
October 6, 2023
Study Start
July 10, 2023
Primary Completion
July 10, 2024
Study Completion
July 10, 2024
Last Updated
October 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10