Comparison Of The Analgesic Efficacy Of IPACK (Interspace Between The Popliteal Artery And Capsule Of The Posterior Knee) Block Alone And IPACK Block Combined With Genicular Block In Patients Planned For Total Knee Arthroplasty
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The IPACK (interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee) block is a regional anesthesia technique in which a local anesthetic is infiltrated under ultrasound guidance between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee. This technique blocks the branches of the obturator nerve, the common peroneal nerve, and the tibial nerve in the popliteal region. In the context of knee arthroplasty, the application of the IPACK block has been associated with lower scores for ambulatory pain, lower scores for resting pain, and reduced morphine consumption . The genicular nerves, including the superomedial, inferomedial, superolateral, inferolateral genicular nerves, and the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve, comprise the five main innervation branches of the knee. Clinically, they play an important role in the anterior sensory innervation of the knee. In the study, the investigators aimed to prospectively, double-blind, and randomly compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of combined IPACK block and genicular block with the sole application of IPACK block in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The investigators hypothesized that in blocks performed with equal volumes, there might be a spread of the local anesthetic solution from the IPACK block area to the genicular block area, and the investigators investigated this hypothesis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 7, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 4, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 4, 2023
CompletedOctober 4, 2023
September 1, 2023
5 months
September 4, 2023
September 26, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain Scores- Visual Analog Scale scores
Visual Analog Scale scores. 0 to 10 scale. 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain.
Postoperatively 0 minute, 30th minute , 60th minute , 2nd hour, 4th hour, 8th hour, 12th hour and 24th hour
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Time to First Analgesic Requirement
Postoperative 24 hours
Patient and Surgeon Satisfaction- 5 point Likert scale
Postoperative 24th hour.
Mobilization Time
Postoperative 24 hours
Study Arms (2)
IPACK block
NO INTERVENTIONIn the IPACK block group, a 20 mL solution containing 50 mg of 0.25% bupivacaine (Buvicaine®, Polifarma, Tekirdağ, Turkey) and 8 mg of dexamethasone (Dekort®, Deva, Istanbul, Turkey) was infiltrated between the popliteal artery and femur, starting 2 cm distal to the popliteal artery and being withdrawn while infiltrating proximally.
IPACK + Genicular Nerve Block
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn the IPACK+GNB group, 12 mL of the same solution was used for the IPACK block infiltration. Then, the patient was positioned supine, and an ultrasound (Logiq e®, GE, Boston, USA) linear probe was placed approximately 2-3 cm above the patella, in the midline of the femur, with a sagittal plane angle of 45 degrees to visualize the femur and genicular artery . The visible needle was advanced in-plane towards the genicular artery, and 4 mL of local anesthetic solution was injected on the surface of the femur. The same procedure was repeated for the superior lateral genicular nerve block, creating a mirror image on the lateral side of the femur.
Interventions
IPACK and Genicular Nerve block were applied with the same total volume of local anesthetic as the control group.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Unilateral total knee arthroplasty
- Between the ages of 18 and 80,
- Classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I-III
You may not qualify if:
- Patients under 18 years old or over 80
- ASA scores IV and above,
- pregnant or suspected of being pregnant,
- allergic to local anesthetics,
- coagulopathy,
- injection site infection,
- significant neurological or psychiatric disorders,
- severe cardiovascular diseases,
- chronic opioid use
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cenk Gacemerlead
Study Sites (1)
Bursa Uludag University
Bursa, 16059, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (8)
A. Fırat, K. Başarır, and M. Binnet, Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Birliği Derneği Diz ekleminin cerrahi anatomisi, TOTBİD Dergisi, 2011; 10 (1): 38-44
BACKGROUNDGARDNER E. The innervation of the knee joint. Anat Rec. 1948 May;101(1):109-30. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091010111. No abstract available.
PMID: 18915634BACKGROUNDSeo SS, Kim OG, Seo JH, Kim DH, Kim YG, Park BY. Comparison of the Effect of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block and Adductor Canal Block after Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg. 2017 Sep;9(3):303-309. doi: 10.4055/cios.2017.9.3.303. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
PMID: 28861197BACKGROUNDXiumei T, Yahao L, Siwei D, Ning N. Correction: Analgesic efficacy of adding the IPACK block to multimodal analgesia protocol for primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Dec 26;17(1):565. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03460-3. No abstract available.
PMID: 36572894BACKGROUNDKukreja P, Venter A, Mason L, Kofskey AM, Northern T, Naranje S, Ghanem E, Lawson PA, Kalagara H. Comparison of Genicular Nerve Block in Combination With Adductor Canal Block in Both Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case Series. Cureus. 2021 Jul 29;13(7):e16712. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16712. eCollection 2021 Jul.
PMID: 34471571BACKGROUNDRoberts SL, Stout A, Dreyfuss P. Review of Knee Joint Innervation: Implications for Diagnostic Blocks and Radiofrequency Ablation. Pain Med. 2020 May 1;21(5):922-938. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz189.
PMID: 31407791BACKGROUNDElsaman AM, Maaty A, Hamed A. Genicular nerve block in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Rheumatol. 2021 Nov;40(11):4501-4509. doi: 10.1007/s10067-021-05821-5. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
PMID: 34213672BACKGROUNDTran J, Giron Arango L, Peng P, Sinha SK, Agur A, Chan V. Evaluation of the iPACK block injectate spread: a cadaveric study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 May 6:rapm-2018-100355. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100355. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 31061110BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 4, 2023
First Posted
October 4, 2023
Study Start
December 7, 2022
Primary Completion
May 15, 2023
Study Completion
June 1, 2023
Last Updated
October 4, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share