The Effect of Intrinsic Focus on Gait Cycle and the Possible Confounding Effect of Noise in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
Research Assistant Doctor
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients with knee osteoarthritis may develop an antalgic gait over time due to pain in the knee, characterized by a decrease in the stance phase and stride length on the painful side. Gait asymmetry, which may lead to different musculoskeletal problems in the future, is observed in the patients. Gait symmetry can be achieved with gait retraining, and effective focus is required during training. In the literature, there are many studies of the positive effects of white noise on focusing, but there are also studies that report that it reduces focusing. Today, exercise training is usually performed in rehabilitation units or on treadmills. As there are important differences between walking on a treadmill and walking outdoors in terms of noise, uneven ground and visual stimuli, the place where walking training is performed does not reflect the outdoor environment. It was aimed to investigate the effect of internal focusing on gait cycle and the effect of white noise and environmental sound on internal focusing in patients with knee osteoarthritis
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
Started Feb 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 8, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 3, 2023
CompletedOctober 3, 2023
October 1, 2023
1.2 years
August 8, 2023
October 2, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Average step cycle (cycle/second)
After walking in each condition, average step cycle was recorded (total of 4 conditions)
Evaluation at first visit of patients meeting the included criteria.12 minutes in total, with 3 minutes of assessment time in each walking condition
Average step length (m)
After walking in each condition, average step length was recorded (total of 4 conditions)
Evaluation at first visit of patients meeting the included criteria.12 minutes in total, with 3 minutes of assessment time in each walking condition
Percentage of step length variability (%)
After walking in each condition, percentage of step length variability was recorded (total of 4 conditions)
Evaluation at first visit of patients meeting the included criteria. 12 minutes in total, with 3 minutes of assessment time in each walking condition
Percentage of left/right side stepping time (%)
After walking in each condition, percentage of left/right side stepping time was recorded (total of 4 conditions)
Evaluation at first visit of patients meeting the included criteria.12 minutes in total, with 3 minutes of assessment time in each walking condition
Ambulation index
After walking in each condition, ambulation index was recorded (total of 4 conditions)
Evaluation at first visit of patients meeting the included criteria.12 minutes in total, with 3 minutes of assessment time in each walking condition
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The User Experience Questionnaire Short Form
Evaluation was performed immediately after execution in white noise and environmentel sound conditions
Study Arms (1)
Patients with knee osteoarthritis
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Walking focusing on ensuring equal step lengths and step durations on both sides and symmetry between both steps
Intrinsic focus accompanied by environmental sound
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Stable general condition
- Good cooperation
- Diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis according to ACR criteria
- At least stage 2 unilateral or bilateral knee osteoarthritis according to Kellgren Lawrence staging
- Individuals \>50 years of age
You may not qualify if:
- Hearing Impairment Scale ≥ 26
- Presence of a neurological, cardiac or orthopedic pathology that prevents walking
- The presence of another pathology other than knee osteoarthritis that affects the knee and causes pain
- Presence of diseases such as osteoarthritis, gout, rheumatoid arthritis affecting other joints in the lower extremity
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Gazi Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Gazi University Faculty of Medicine
Ankara, 06560, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (11)
Roos EM, Arden NK. Strategies for the prevention of knee osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2016 Feb;12(2):92-101. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.135. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
PMID: 26439406BACKGROUNDLespasio MJ, Piuzzi NS, Husni ME, Muschler GF, Guarino A, Mont MA. Knee Osteoarthritis: A Primer. Perm J. 2017;21:16-183. doi: 10.7812/TPP/16-183.
PMID: 29035179BACKGROUNDTurcot K, Armand S, Lubbeke A, Fritschy D, Hoffmeyer P, Suva D. Does knee alignment influence gait in patients with severe knee osteoarthritis? Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2013 Jan;28(1):34-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.09.004. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
PMID: 23063098BACKGROUNDNeumann DL. A Systematic Review of Attentional Focus Strategies in Weightlifting. Front Sports Act Living. 2019 Aug 9;1:7. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2019.00007. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 33344931BACKGROUNDJohnson L, Burridge JH, Demain SH. Internal and external focus of attention during gait re-education: an observational study of physical therapist practice in stroke rehabilitation. Phys Ther. 2013 Jul;93(7):957-66. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120300. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
PMID: 23559523BACKGROUNDWulf G, Prinz W. Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: a review. Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Dec;8(4):648-60. doi: 10.3758/bf03196201.
PMID: 11848583BACKGROUNDFaisal AA, Selen LP, Wolpert DM. Noise in the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Apr;9(4):292-303. doi: 10.1038/nrn2258.
PMID: 18319728BACKGROUNDMuzet A. Environmental noise, sleep and health. Sleep Med Rev. 2007 Apr;11(2):135-42. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2006.09.001. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
PMID: 17317241BACKGROUNDShidara M, Richmond BJ. Effect of visual noise on pattern recognition. Exp Brain Res. 2005 May;163(2):239-41. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-2230-0. Epub 2005 Mar 15.
PMID: 15912370BACKGROUNDHelps SK, Bamford S, Sonuga-Barke EJ, Soderlund GB. Different effects of adding white noise on cognitive performance of sub-, normal and super-attentive school children. PLoS One. 2014 Nov 13;9(11):e112768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112768. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 25393410BACKGROUNDvan Kempen E, van Kamp I, Lebret E, Lammers J, Emmen H, Stansfeld S. Neurobehavioral effects of transportation noise in primary schoolchildren: a cross-sectional study. Environ Health. 2010 Jun 1;9:25. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-9-25.
PMID: 20515466BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Assistant Medical Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 8, 2023
First Posted
October 3, 2023
Study Start
February 1, 2022
Primary Completion
April 30, 2023
Study Completion
April 30, 2023
Last Updated
October 3, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share