NCT06057597

Brief Summary

Obesity with its consequences such as type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, dyslipidemia, fatty liver disease, sleep apnea and cancers, remains a major healthcare problem worldwide. Bariatric surgery, combined with nutritional education and close monitoring, has been shown to be the most effective treatment for patients with morbid obesity resulting in significant and lasting weight loss and improvements in co-morbidities . With nearly 50000 procedures per year France ranks third in the world in terms of care for patients suffering from morbid (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m²) and severe (BMI 35-40 kg/m²) obesity. In parallel with the significant increase in the number of patients operated on for obesity in the world, over the past two decades, significant development has been observed in the field of bariatric surgery with a decrease or even disappearance of some procedures and the appearance of others. Performed for more than 40 years, the Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) is a restrictive and malabsorptive procedure and currently is considered as gold standard procedure for the treatment of morbid obesity and its comorbidities. However, despite the good effectiveness (with an average Excess Weight Loss % (EWL%) of approximatively 70% at 2 years), RYGB is technically demanding procedure with learning curve requiring more than 100 cases and an overall complication rate ranging from 10% to 20% Introduced in 2001, one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a modified gastric bypass that consists of a single gastrojejunal anastomosis between a long gastric pouch and a jejunal (biliopancreatic) omega loop. In Sept. 2019, taking into account the results from YOMEGA trial, the French High Authority for Health (Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS)) recommended to ban OAGB with 200 cm or longer BPL and urged to assess the efficacy and safety of OAGB with 150 cm BPL in a randomized controlled trial. Indeed, YOMEGA-2 trial is logical continuity of the YOMEGA trial. The aim of this study is to assess weight loss efficiency and the nutritional safety of the OAGB-150 in comparison to a standard (RYGB). The hypothesis of this study is that the OAGB with a 150 cm BPL could have the same efficacy on weight loss and nutritional complication rate in comparison to the RYGB at 2 years.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
368

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable obesity

Timeline
32mo left

Started Nov 2023

Longer than P75 for not_applicable obesity

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress49%
Nov 2023Dec 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 3, 2023

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 28, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 13, 2023

Completed
4.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2028

Expected
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2028

Last Updated

February 27, 2026

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4.9 years

First QC Date

April 3, 2023

Last Update Submit

February 24, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Bariatric surgeryRYGBMGB/OAGB

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • To demonstrate that OAGB with 150 cm biliopancreatic limb is not inferior to RYGB on weight loss (efficacy).

    For each patient co-primary endpoints will be assessed at 2 years after surgery composed by: Efficacy: Weight loss according to Excess Weight Loss % (EWL%) calculated using the following formula: ((weight 2 years after surgery - initial weight) / (initial weight - ideal weight)) x 100. Ideal weight defined as the weight corresponding to a BMI = 25 kg/m². The assessment of the primary co-endpoint will be standardized between the sites.

    2 years after the surgery

  • To demonstrate that OAGB with 150 cm biliopancreatic limb is not inferior to RYGB on nutritional complication rate (safety)

    For each patient co-primary endpoints will be assessed at 2 years after surgery composed by: Safety: Nutritional complications defined by at least one vitamin deficiency (vit. B1 \< 66nmol/l or B12 \< 145pmol/l), malnutrition (albumin \< 30g/l), anemia (hemoglobin \< 10g/dl) or a combination of these. The assessment of the primary co-endpoint will be standardized between the sites.

    2 years after the surgery

Secondary Outcomes (43)

  • Measurement of albumin

    Before and 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after surgery

  • Measurement of pre-albumin

    Before and 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after surgery

  • Measurement of hemoglobin

    Before and 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after surgery

  • Measurement of calcium

    Before and 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after surgery

  • Measurement of ferritin

    Before and 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after surgery

  • +38 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Experimental group

EXPERIMENTAL

This corresponds to patients with type 2 obesity (BMI 35-40) with comorbidities (high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, obstructive sleep apnea, dyslipidemia, arthrosis) and type 3 obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m²) and candidates for bariatric surgery. Laparoscopic OAGB will be performed with long and narrow gastric pouch (30cc) and 150 cm biliopancreatic limb

Procedure: Laparoscopic OAGB

Control Groupe

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This corresponds to patients with type 2 obesity (BMI 35-40) with comorbidities (high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, obstructive sleep apnea, dyslipidemia, arthrosis) and type 3 obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m²) and candidates for bariatric surgery. Standard laparoscopic RYGB will be performed with a gastric pouch (30cc) and 150 cm antecolic Roux limb and a 50 cm biliopancreatic limb.

Procedure: Laparoscopic RYGB

Interventions

It is a gastric bypass surgery with a unique gastro-jejunal anastomosis, a long (11-14cm) and narrow (3-4cm) gastric pouch will be created by applying one horizontal 45-mm stapler at the angle of lesser curvature, just above the left branch of the crow's foot, and then four to five vertical 60-mm staple cartridges will be placed upwards to the angle of His, and calibrated along a 32-Fr bougie. Sectioning of the greater omentum into a bivalve will be performed. The jejunum will be measured using pre-measured strip and amounted antecolically at 150 cm from the ligament of Treitz. An end-to-side anastomosis will be performed with the gastric pouch, using a 45-mm linear stapler and an anterior running suture to close gastro-enterotomy.

Also known as: One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass / Mini Gastric Bypass
Experimental group

A small gastric pouch (30cc) will be created using a linear stapler. The alimentary limb will be moved up into an antecolic position after an epiploic transection so as to perform the gastro-jujunal anastomosis. The gastro-jejunostomy will be performed manually or using a linear or circular stapler. An alimentary limb of 150 cm and a biliary limb of 50cm will be measured (using premeasured strip) in order to perform the latero-lateral jejuno-jejunal anastomosis using a linear stapler. All mesenteric defects (Petersen's space and mesenteric defect) will be closed with a non-absorbable running suture

Also known as: Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
Control Groupe

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient aged from 18 to 65 years old
  • Type III obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m²), or Type II obesity BMI 35-40 kg/m2 associated with at least one co-morbidity which will be improved by surgery (high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, obstructive sleep apnea, dyslipidemia, arthrosis)
  • Patient who had benefited from an Upper GI Endoscopy with biopsies to look for Helicobacter pylori within 12 months before surgery
  • Patient who has benefited from a multidisciplinary evaluation at least 6 months, with a favorable opinion for a gastric bypass
  • Patient who understood and accepted the need for a long-term follow-up
  • Patient who agreed to be included in the study and who signed the informed consent form
  • Patient affiliated to a social security scheme
  • For child-bearing aged women, efficient contraception

You may not qualify if:

  • History of previous bariatric surgery
  • History of chronic inflammatory bowel disease
  • Presence of chronic diarrhea
  • Presence of a severe and evolutive life threatening pathology
  • Presence of dysplastic modifications of the gastric mucosa, chronic atrophic gastritis or history of gastric cancer
  • Presence of an unhealed gastro-duodenal ulcer
  • Presence of Helicobacter pylori resistant to medical treatment
  • Presence of esophagitis
  • Pregnancy or desire to be pregnant during the study
  • Mentally unbalanced patients, under supervision or guardianship
  • Patients who don't understand French and not able to give consent
  • Patient included and followed in another interventional trial
  • Unable to consent, under tutelage or curatorship, or judiciary safeguard
  • Presence of type 1 diabetes

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hôpital Bichat Claude-Bernard

Paris, France

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Obesity

Interventions

Gastric Bypass

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OverweightOvernutritionNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesBody WeightSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bariatric SurgeryBariatricsObesity ManagementTherapeuticsGastroenterostomyAnastomosis, SurgicalSurgical Procedures, OperativeDigestive System Surgical Procedures

Study Officials

  • Tigran POGHOSYAN, MD-PhD

    Bichat (APHP)

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Tigran POGHOSYAN, MD-PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2023

First Posted

September 28, 2023

Study Start

November 13, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Last Updated

February 27, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations