Comparison of Allegra vs Sapien Transcatheter Aortic Valves in Valve-In-Valve Indication
Clinical Trial of the Results of Allegra vs Sapien Transcatheter Aortic Valves in Valve-In-Valve Indication
1 other identifier
interventional
104
2 countries
9
Brief Summary
The VIVALL-2 study is a randomized trial to compare the self-expandable supra-annular Allegra and the balloon-expandable intra-annular Edwards transcatheter valve systems in patients with degenerated biological aortic surgical valve.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 17, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 22, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2026
December 19, 2025
December 1, 2025
2.8 years
August 17, 2023
December 15, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Trans-aortic mean gradient after Valve-in-Valve procedure, measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE).
Trans-aortic mean gradient after Valve-in-Valve procedure, measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE).
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Proportion of patients with device success after the Valve In Valve (VIV) procedure
30 days
Proportion of patients with a trans-aortic mean gradient higher than 20 mmHg after the VIV procedure
30 days
Proportion of patients with moderate or severe prosthesis mismatch 30 days after the VIV intervention.
30 days
Early safety at 30 days as defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3) criteria
30 days
Clinical efficacy at 1 year as defined by VARC-3 criteria
1 year
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
NVT ALLEGRA System TF
ACTIVE COMPARATORNVT ALLEGRA System TF
EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 or SAPIEN ULTRA SYSTEM
EXPERIMENTALEDWARDS SAPIEN 3 or SAPIEN ULTRA SYSTEM
Interventions
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation of a NVT ALLEGRA TAVI System TF in patients with severe haemodynamical valve deterioration of a biological aortic valve implanted surgically
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation of an EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 SYSTEM in patients with severe haemodynamical valve deterioration of a biological aortic valve implanted surgically
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients meeting ALL the following criteria will be included:
- Patients aged ≥ 18 years.
- Severe haemodynamical valve deterioration of a biological aortic valve implanted surgically, including severe valve stenosis (effective aortic valve area \< 1.0 cm2) and/or severe valve regurgitation.
- The patient has cardiac symptoms and/or deterioration of left ventricular ejection fraction attributable to the aortic valve disease.
- Heart team decision of VIV procedure.
- Patient is willing to return at 30 days for TTE and to be clinically contacted at 1 year.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients meeting, at least, 1 of the following criteria will be excluded:
- Patients who openly express their refusal to participate in the study.
- Female patients in gestational age.
- Presence or suspicious of biological aortic valve thrombosis.
- Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to antithrombotic therapy (or inability to be anticoagulated during the procedure), nitinol, or sensitivity to contrast media which cannot be adequately pre-medicated.
- Ongoing sepsis and/or suspicious or diagnosis of endocarditis.
- Patients whose life expectancy is \< 1 year due to non-cardiac comorbid conditions.
- Medical, social, or psychological conditions that preclude the subject from appropriate consent or adherence to the protocol required follow-up exams.
- True inner diameter of the prosthetic valve \> 27 mm.
- Transfemoral access inadequate to accommodate an 18F sheath.
- Patients included in other clinical trials (excluding registries).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Fundación EPIClead
Study Sites (9)
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907, Spain
Hospital Clinico San Carlos
Madrid, 28040, Spain
Hospital Universitario de La Paz
Madrid, 28046, Spain
Hospital Universitario Puerta De Hierro
Majadahonda, 28222, Spain
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Salamanca
Salamanca, 37007, Spain
Hospital Universitari I Politècnic de La Fe
Valencia, 46026, Spain
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
Manchester, United Kingdom
Freeman Hospital
Newcastle, United Kingdom
Morriston Hospital, Swansea
Swansea, United Kingdom
Related Publications (7)
Moreno R, Baz JA, Moreu J, Berenguer A, Gonzalvez-Garcia A, Galeote G, Hernandez U, Canton T, Jimenez-Valero S, Jurado-Roman A, Moya H, Lazaro E. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated aortic valves: Experience with a new supra-annular device. The Spanish Allegra valve-in-valve (SAVIV) registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Aug 1;98(2):365-370. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29742. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
PMID: 33890713BACKGROUNDHirji SA, Percy ED, Zogg CK, Malarczyk A, Harloff MT, Yazdchi F, Kaneko T. Comparison of in-hospital outcomes and readmissions for valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement vs. reoperative surgical aortic valve replacement: a contemporary assessment of real-world outcomes. Eur Heart J. 2020 Aug 1;41(29):2747-2755. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa252.
PMID: 32445575BACKGROUNDBleiziffer S, Simonato M, Webb JG, Rodes-Cabau J, Pibarot P, Kornowski R, Windecker S, Erlebach M, Duncan A, Seiffert M, Unbehaun A, Frerker C, Conzelmann L, Wijeysundera H, Kim WK, Montorfano M, Latib A, Tchetche D, Allali A, Abdel-Wahab M, Orvin K, Stortecky S, Nissen H, Holzamer A, Urena M, Testa L, Agrifoglio M, Whisenant B, Sathananthan J, Napodano M, Landi A, Fiorina C, Zittermann A, Veulemans V, Sinning JM, Saia F, Brecker S, Presbitero P, De Backer O, Sondergaard L, Bruschi G, Franco LN, Petronio AS, Barbanti M, Cerillo A, Spargias K, Schofer J, Cohen M, Munoz-Garcia A, Finkelstein A, Adam M, Serra V, Teles RC, Champagnac D, Iadanza A, Chodor P, Eggebrecht H, Welsh R, Caixeta A, Salizzoni S, Dager A, Auffret V, Cheema A, Ubben T, Ancona M, Rudolph T, Gummert J, Tseng E, Noble S, Bunc M, Roberts D, Kass M, Gupta A, Leon MB, Dvir D. Long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic valves. Eur Heart J. 2020 Aug 1;41(29):2731-2742. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa544.
PMID: 32592401BACKGROUNDRodes-Cabau J, Abbas AE, Serra V, Vilalta V, Nombela-Franco L, Regueiro A, Al-Azizi KM, Iskander A, Conradi L, Forcillo J, Lilly S, Calabuig A, Fernandez-Nofrerias E, Mohammadi S, Panagides V, Pelletier-Beaumont E, Pibarot P. Balloon- vs Self-Expanding Valve Systems for Failed Small Surgical Aortic Valve Bioprostheses. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Aug 16;80(7):681-693. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.05.005. Epub 2022 May 18.
PMID: 35597385BACKGROUNDHahn RT, Webb J, Pibarot P, Ternacle J, Herrmann HC, Suri RM, Dvir D, Leipsic J, Blanke P, Jaber WA, Kodali S, Kapadia S, Makkar R, Thourani V, Williams M, Salaun E, Vincent F, Xu K, Leon MB, Mack M. 5-Year Follow-Up From the PARTNER 2 Aortic Valve-in-Valve Registry for Degenerated Aortic Surgical Bioprostheses. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Apr 11;15(7):698-708. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.02.014.
PMID: 35393102BACKGROUNDSa MPBO, Van den Eynde J, Simonato M, Cavalcanti LRP, Doulamis IP, Weixler V, Kampaktsis PN, Gallo M, Laforgia PL, Zhigalov K, Ruhparwar A, Weymann A, Pibarot P, Clavel MA. Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: An Updated Meta-Analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jan 25;14(2):211-220. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.10.020.
PMID: 33478639BACKGROUNDLandes U, Sathananthan J, Witberg G, De Backer O, Sondergaard L, Abdel-Wahab M, Holzhey D, Kim WK, Hamm C, Buzzatti N, Montorfano M, Ludwig S, Conradi L, Seiffert M, Guerrero M, El Sabbagh A, Rodes-Cabau J, Guimaraes L, Codner P, Okuno T, Pilgrim T, Fiorina C, Colombo A, Mangieri A, Eltchaninoff H, Nombela-Franco L, Van Wiechen MPH, Van Mieghem NM, Tchetche D, Schoels WH, Kullmer M, Tamburino C, Sinning JM, Al-Kassou B, Perlman GY, Danenberg H, Ielasi A, Fraccaro C, Tarantini G, De Marco F, Redwood SR, Lisko JC, Babaliaros VC, Laine M, Nerla R, Castriota F, Finkelstein A, Loewenstein I, Eitan A, Jaffe R, Ruile P, Neumann FJ, Piazza N, Alosaimi H, Sievert H, Sievert K, Russo M, Andreas M, Bunc M, Latib A, Godfrey R, Hildick-Smith D, Chuang MA, Blanke P, Leipsic J, Wood DA, Nazif TM, Kodali S, Barbanti M, Kornowski R, Leon MB, Webb JG. Transcatheter Replacement of Transcatheter Versus Surgically Implanted Aortic Valve Bioprostheses. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jan 5;77(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.10.053.
PMID: 33413929BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 17, 2023
First Posted
September 22, 2023
Study Start
February 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Last Updated
December 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12