NCT06043128

Brief Summary

Trunk control is important for maintaining an upright posture, increasing the quality of movement during dynamic activities, and performing transfer activities safely. Individuals with stroke, which is one of the most common neurological diseases in the world, may have various degrees of trunk affect because the contraction strength of the trunk muscles and their ability to work in harmony with each other are reduced. Depending on the increase in the level of trunk involvement, proprioceptive deterioration, increase in balance problems and deterioration in spasticity characteristics can be observed in patients. However, the relationship between these disorders in individuals with stroke, independent of trunk involvement, has not been defined. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to examine the relationship between proprioceptive awareness and balance and spasticity in stroke patients with different trunk involvement levels. 98 chronic stroke patients will be included in the study. Before the study, written and verbal "Informed Consent Form" will be obtained from all participants who meet the inclusion criteria. After recording the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the participants, the cognitive status of the patients will be evaluated with a mini mental test. Trunk Impairment Scale (TRS) will be used to measure trunk control, which is our independent variable. GBS will be administered by another physiotherapist who is blinded to the study. Participants will be divided into two groups, high and low trunk control, according to the score obtained from the GBS. Spasticity of the participants, Modified Tardiue Scale (MTS), cervical proprioceptive awareness cervical joint error test, lower extremity proprioceptive awareness Proprioception test in Technobody Prokin 252 Isokinetic Balance Platform, balance skills Dynamic and static balance in Tecnobody Prokin 252 Isonkinetic Balance Platform will be evaluated by tests. The patients' quality of life will be evaluated with the stroke-specific quality of life scale. In order to prevent bias, scores obtained from the GBÖ will not be shared with the physiotherapist who performs other tests. All data obtained will be noted on a prepared evaluation form. After all data is collected, intra-group and inter-group comparisons will be made.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
98

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2023

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2023

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 12, 2023

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 21, 2023

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 27, 2024

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 15, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

September 22, 2023

Status Verified

September 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

September 12, 2023

Last Update Submit

September 20, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

StrokeBalanceProprioceptionSpasticity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Trunk impairment scale

    It consists of 3 items with different scoring alternatives. The dynamic sitting balance subscale consists of 10 items with 0 and 1 scoring options. The coordination subscale includes 4 items with different scoring alternatives. Possible compensatory strategies used during the administration of Trunk impairment scale to the patient are also evaluated. After all items have been evaluated 3 times, the best result is recorded as the patient's performance value. A score of 23 from the scale indicates that optimal trunk control is achieved, while a score approaching 0 indicates that trunk control has decreased. Turkish validity and reliability study of Trunk impairment scale in stroke patients Sag et al. Made by.

    20 minutes

  • Modified Tardieu Scale

    Modified Tardieu Scale consists of parameters that evaluate the angle and degree of spasticity. The scale evaluates spasticity at three different speeds in order to evaluate the speed-dependent effect of spasticity. These velocities are defined as V1, V2 and V3 velocities. V1 speed represents the evaluation at the lowest speed and V3 represents the evaluation at the highest speed. In all 3 speeds, the target joints are moved passively within the full range of motion, and the value range at which spasticity is observed is calculated by the goniometer. Spasticity degree is made between 0-4. "0" indicates no spasticity, "4" indicates indefatigable clonus (\>10 seconds while mainta)

    25 minutes

  • Evaluation of Proprioceptive Awareness

    Cervical Joint Position Error Test will be applied to evaluate the awareness of the sense that detects neck position. Patients are seated in a chair with back support, 90 cm away from the target board fixed to the wall. Patients are first asked to memorize the position without their head tilting in any direction and try to find the same point after an active head movement. Active head movements include flexion, extension, and right and left rotations. The desired movements are repeated 10 times. After the movement, the horizontal, vertical and global distances of each point returned to the starting point will be recorded. To calculate the test result, the average values of the incorrect distances in centimeters will be calculated.

    30 minutes

  • Evaluation of static and dynamic balance

    To measure balance performance, patients are given a movable balance platform on the Tecnobody Prokin 252 balance platform, powered by air piston servo motors. The patient is raised on the platform that detects the sensitive measurement, which can be both movable and fixed. Thanks to the automatic engine locking function, the system instantly switches from dynamic to static measurement and provides measurement of two different balances with objective results.

    15 minutes

  • Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale

    It consists of 12 subsections, including energy, family roles, language, mobility, mood, personality, self-care, social roles, thinking, upper extremity function, vision and work efficiency, and a total of 49 items. In PESS, increasing the total score indicates that the quality of life increases, while decreasing the total score indicates that the quality of life decreases.

    10 minutes

Study Arms (2)

Group with High Body Control

This group consists of stroke patients who received 23 or close to 23 points on the trunk impairment scale. In these patients, muscle stiffness, awareness of the sense of balance and position, quality of life will be evaluated and their relationships will be examined.

Other: Patients With Stroke With Different Trunk Impact Levels

Group with Low Body Control

This group consists of stroke patients who received 0 points or close to 0 points from the trunk impairment scale. In these patients, muscle stiffness, awareness of the sense of balance and position, quality of life will be evaluated and their relationships will be examined.

Other: Patients With Stroke With Different Trunk Impact Levels

Interventions

Before the study, written and verbal "Informed Consent Form" will be obtained from all participants who meet the inclusion criteria.Trunk Impairment Scale (TRS) will be used to measure trunk control, which is our independent variable. Scores close to 23 points on the TIS will constitute the group with high trunk control, and those with scores close to 0 will constitute the group with low trunk control. Spasticity of the participants, Modified Tardiue Scale (MTS), cervical proprioceptive awareness cervical joint error test, lower extremity proprioceptive awareness Proprioception test in Technobody Prokin 252 Isokinetic Balance Platform, balance skills Dynamic and static balance in Tecnobody Prokin 252 Isonkinetic Balance Platform will be evaluated by tests. The patients' quality of life will be evaluated with the stroke-specific quality of life scale. All data obtained will be noted on a prepared evaluation form.

Also known as: Group with Low Body Control, Group with High Body Control
Group with High Body ControlGroup with Low Body Control

Eligibility Criteria

Age35 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

It will consist of stroke patients who live in Kocaeli province and exhibit a hemiplegic-hemiparetic picture for at least 6 months after the stroke event.

You may qualify if:

  • Volunteering to participate in the study
  • Being between the ages of 35-65
  • Being diagnosed with stroke
  • Having a stroke for the first time
  • Mini Mental Test (MMT) Score ≥ 24
  • Brunnstorm lower extremity stage ≥ 4
  • Being clinically stable

You may not qualify if:

  • Mini Mental Score \<24 points
  • Having cervical pain of 5 or higher on the visual analog scale
  • Having serious vestibular, auditory and visual problems that affect balance (vertigo, etc.)
  • Having a history of orthopedic surgery for the trunk and lower extremities
  • Presence of an additional neurological disease (MS, Parkinson, Alzheimer's)
  • Having joint rigidity that will prevent proprioceptive evaluation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Güler Ertuğrul

Kocaeli, Turkey (Türkiye)

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

StrokeMuscle Spasticity

Interventions

Population Groups

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesMuscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesMuscle HypertoniaNeuromuscular ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DemographyPopulation Characteristics

Study Officials

  • GÜLER ERTUĞRUL

    Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Health Sciences

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • MEHMET DURAY

    Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Health Sciences

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Target Duration
1 Day
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MSc student, physiotherapist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2023

First Posted

September 21, 2023

Study Start

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion

February 27, 2024

Study Completion

August 15, 2024

Last Updated

September 22, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations