Effect of the Automatic Surveillance System on Surveillance Rate of Patients with Gastric Premalignant Lesions
1 other identifier
interventional
1,460
1 country
4
Brief Summary
In this study, we proposed a prospective study about the effect of the automatic surveillance system on surveillance rate of patients with gastric premalignant lesions. The enrolled patients were divided into group A with intelligent surveillance system, group B with manual reminder, and group C with natural state. The surveillance among the three groups will be compared.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2023
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 9, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 10, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 15, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2029
November 4, 2024
August 1, 2024
5.3 years
September 9, 2023
November 1, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
On-time Surveillance Rate
The numerator is the number of patients with on-time surveillance, and the denominator is the number of all patients with gastric premalignant lesions requiring surveillance.
From enrollment to study completion, assessed up to 3 years.
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Surveillance Rate
From enrollment to study completion, assessed up to 3 years.
Advance Surveillance Rate
From enrollment to study completion, assessed up to 3 years.
Delayed Surveillance Rate
From enrollment to study completion, assessed up to 3 years.
The accuracy of identifying patients with gastric premalignant lesions
1 day At the time of enrollment
The accuracy of classifying risk levels
1 day At the time of enrollment
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
With automatic surveillance system
EXPERIMENTALPatients were reminded of the surveillance time by an automatic surveillance system after the endoscopic and pathological results were available and before the surveillance time.
With manual reminder
EXPERIMENTALPatients were reminded of the surveillance time manually after the endoscopic and pathological results were available and before the surveillance time.
Normal group
NO INTERVENTIONThe patients in the control group were observed in the clinical natural state of surveillance without automatic surveillance system or manual reminder.
Interventions
An automatic surveillance (AS) system accurately identify patients with gastric premalignant lesions, assign surveillance intervals for different risks of patients and proactively follow up with patients at certain times.
Medical staff remind patients to review manually.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female aged 18 years or older who undergo upper endoscopy.
You may not qualify if:
- )No contact information or invalid contact information.
- \) The surveillance interval cannot be determined according to the surveillance guidelines, including no upper gastrointestinal pathology, therapeutic endoscopy or with history of previous gastrectomy, esophagectomy, or ESD, no dysplasia degrees, no biopsy sites, non-epithelial lesions, duodenal lesions, ulcer and so on.
- \) Needless for surveillance or others.
- \) High-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer of the esophagus or stomach.
- \) Low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia of the esophagus and Barrett's esophagus.
- \) High-risk diseases or other special conditions for which the patient is deemed unsuitable for clinical trials by the investigator.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Jinjiang Municipal Hospital, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Fujian Campus
Quanzhou, Fujian, China
The Eighth Hospital of Wuhan
Wuhan, Hubei, 430014, China
Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
Wuhan, Hubei, 430060, China
Shanghai Pudong Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 201399, China
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Honggang Yu, PhD
Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 9, 2023
First Posted
September 15, 2023
Study Start
September 10, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2029
Last Updated
November 4, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share