IDEAS-AAP System Diagnoses Acute Abdominal Pain
Computer-aided, Evidence-based System Improved Clinical Diagnostic Accuracy of Certificated-Physicians in Acute Abdominal Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
151
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a study to validate the effect of the intelligent diagnostic evidence-based analytic system in acute abdominal pain augmentation. Included physicians were randomly assigned into control or AI-assisted group. In this experiment, the whole electronic health record of each acute abdominal pain patient was divided into two parts, signs and symptoms recording (including chief complaint, present history, physical examination, past medical history, trauma surgery history, personal history, family history, obstetrical history, menstrual history, blood transfusion history, drug allergy history) and auxiliary examination recording (including laboratory examination and radiology report). For each case, the control group readers will first read the signs and symptoms recording of electronic health record and make a clinical diagnosis. Then the readers have to decide to either order a list of auxiliary examinations or confirm the clinical diagnosis without further examination. If the readers choose to order examinations, the corresponding examination results will be feedback to the readers, and the readers can then decide to either continue to order a list of auxiliary examinations or make a confirming diagnosis. Such cycle will last until the reader make a confirming diagnosis. For the AI-assisted readers, the physicians were additionally provided with the feature extracted by IDEAS-AAP, a list of suspicious diagnoses predicted by IDEAS-AAP, and corresponding diagnostic criteria according to guidelines. After the readers get the examination results, the IDEAS-AAP will renew its diagnosis prediction
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 9, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 11, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 15, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2022
CompletedNovember 8, 2022
August 1, 2022
17 days
August 9, 2022
November 3, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The accuracy of clinical diagnosis.
Calculation method = number of right cases / total number of cases 100%
one week
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Accuracy of the prediction of disease based on whole electronic health record
one week
The prediction of disease based on whole electronic health record and criteria matching
one week
Time cost of EHR reading
one week
Study Arms (2)
Experimental: with Artificial intelligence assistant system
EXPERIMENTALThe physicians were additionally provided with the feature extracted by the system, a list of suspicious diagnoses predicted by IDEAS-AAP, and corresponding diagnostic criteria according to guidelines. After the readers get the examination results, the IDEAS-AAP will renew its diagnosis prediction. IDEAS-AAP extracted feature from electronic health record, provided a list of suspicious diagnoses, and corresponding diagnostic criteria according to guidelines. After the readers get the examination results, the IDEAS-AAP will renew its diagnosis prediction.
No Intervention: without Artificial intelligence assistant system
NO INTERVENTIONInterventions
The AI-assisted diagnosis system can provide the direction of disease diagnosis in real time and assist the doctor to give the final diagnosis
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males or females who are over 18 years old;
- After qualified medical education and obtained the Certificate of medical practitioner;
You may not qualify if:
- Physicians without qualified medical education and didn't obtain the Certificate of medical practitioner;
- The researcher believes that the subjects are not suitable for participating in clinical trials.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
Wuhan, Hubei, 430060, China
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Honggang Yu, MD
Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 9, 2022
First Posted
August 11, 2022
Study Start
August 15, 2022
Primary Completion
September 1, 2022
Study Completion
October 1, 2022
Last Updated
November 8, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08