NCT05497258

Brief Summary

This is a study to validate the effect of the intelligent diagnostic evidence-based analytic system in acute abdominal pain augmentation. Included physicians were randomly assigned into control or AI-assisted group. In this experiment, the whole electronic health record of each acute abdominal pain patient was divided into two parts, signs and symptoms recording (including chief complaint, present history, physical examination, past medical history, trauma surgery history, personal history, family history, obstetrical history, menstrual history, blood transfusion history, drug allergy history) and auxiliary examination recording (including laboratory examination and radiology report). For each case, the control group readers will first read the signs and symptoms recording of electronic health record and make a clinical diagnosis. Then the readers have to decide to either order a list of auxiliary examinations or confirm the clinical diagnosis without further examination. If the readers choose to order examinations, the corresponding examination results will be feedback to the readers, and the readers can then decide to either continue to order a list of auxiliary examinations or make a confirming diagnosis. Such cycle will last until the reader make a confirming diagnosis. For the AI-assisted readers, the physicians were additionally provided with the feature extracted by IDEAS-AAP, a list of suspicious diagnoses predicted by IDEAS-AAP, and corresponding diagnostic criteria according to guidelines. After the readers get the examination results, the IDEAS-AAP will renew its diagnosis prediction

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
151

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 9, 2022

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 11, 2022

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 15, 2022

Completed
17 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

November 8, 2022

Status Verified

August 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

17 days

First QC Date

August 9, 2022

Last Update Submit

November 3, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The accuracy of clinical diagnosis.

    Calculation method = number of right cases / total number of cases 100%

    one week

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Accuracy of the prediction of disease based on whole electronic health record

    one week

  • The prediction of disease based on whole electronic health record and criteria matching

    one week

  • Time cost of EHR reading

    one week

Study Arms (2)

Experimental: with Artificial intelligence assistant system

EXPERIMENTAL

The physicians were additionally provided with the feature extracted by the system, a list of suspicious diagnoses predicted by IDEAS-AAP, and corresponding diagnostic criteria according to guidelines. After the readers get the examination results, the IDEAS-AAP will renew its diagnosis prediction. IDEAS-AAP extracted feature from electronic health record, provided a list of suspicious diagnoses, and corresponding diagnostic criteria according to guidelines. After the readers get the examination results, the IDEAS-AAP will renew its diagnosis prediction.

Device: Artificial intelligence assistant system

No Intervention: without Artificial intelligence assistant system

NO INTERVENTION

Interventions

The AI-assisted diagnosis system can provide the direction of disease diagnosis in real time and assist the doctor to give the final diagnosis

Experimental: with Artificial intelligence assistant system

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Males or females who are over 18 years old;
  • After qualified medical education and obtained the Certificate of medical practitioner;

You may not qualify if:

  • Physicians without qualified medical education and didn't obtain the Certificate of medical practitioner;
  • The researcher believes that the subjects are not suitable for participating in clinical trials.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University

Wuhan, Hubei, 430060, China

Location

Study Officials

  • Honggang Yu, MD

    Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Experimental: doctor with AI-assisted system;Control:without AI-assisted system
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 9, 2022

First Posted

August 11, 2022

Study Start

August 15, 2022

Primary Completion

September 1, 2022

Study Completion

October 1, 2022

Last Updated

November 8, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-08

Locations