Improving Shared Decision Making on the Neonatal Unit Through Assessment of Parental Experiences

NCT06035640 | Recruiting

• 1 other identifier: 2022/CTU2/NEONAT
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 30
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

1 in 7 infants born in the United Kingdom will require treatment on a Neonatal unit to treat conditions, which vary in there level of severity. Treatments and interventions aimed at supporting the unwell neonate have associated risks and the evidence underpinning them can range from limited to substantial. There is a degree of uncertainty in Neonatology, which can be very stressful for parents and clinicians alike. Parents need to be supported by the clinical team in making many complicated clinical decisions, a skill that requires robust communication of risks, benefits and alternatives. In 2019 the British Association of Perinatal Medicine released a framework of care advocating Shared Decision Making (SDM) as the optimal process for making clinical decisions on neonatal units. This model builds upon the "informed decision" models by putting a greater emphasis on involving parents in key decisions regarding the treatment of their babies medical condition. Evidence has demonstrated that SDM can improve parental satisfaction and reduce anxiety and the likelihood of feeling regret. In order to support parents in the SDM process, clinicians need to be able to provide impartial information encompassing the proposed intervention, intended benefit, potential risks and alternatives. Whilst clinicians may have preconceptions on the information that they think should be provided, there is limited evidence in the literature of what are the most important concepts and themes that parents would expect to be conveyed during the SDM process. ShAPE is a qualitative study that aims to

Conditions

Communication

Keywords

Neonatal Care; Shared Decision Making

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• What are the main communicative, environmental and informative factors that support the facilitation of effective shared decision making on the neonatal unit? We aim to identify common themes that highlight aspects of the decision making process.

  We aim to identify common themes that highlight aspects of the decision making process, which are the most important to parents.

  Interviews will focus on encounters with clinical staff, whilst their infant was an inpatient on a Neonatal Unit. Interviews will be performed over the 1year period of the recruitment window.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

• How does the quality of the shared decision process, experienced by parents on neonatal units in the UK, impact their level of satisfaction with the care their infant received?

  Interviews will focus on encounters with clinical staff, whilst their infant was an inpatient on a Neonatal Unit. Interviews will be performed over the 1year period of the recruitment window.

Interventions

Interview OTHER

Participants will be engaged in a semi-structured interview.

Eligibility Criteria

• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Child (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This study will recruit parents of infants who have received care on a Neonatal Unit within the past 2years. Given the nature of interventions being studied, these are most likely to be (but not limited to) premature infants.

You may qualify if:

• Parent of an Infant who, whilst on a neonatal unit, has received either; a transfusion of blood products, pharmacotherapy for persistent ductus arteriosus or corticosteroid therapy for chronic lung disease

You may not qualify if:

• The infant must have received the above treatments within the last 6 months prior to interview AND have been discharged from neonatal care for at least 4 weeks

Sponsors & Collaborators

• East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust: lead

Study Sites (1)

William Harvey Hospital

Ashford, Kent, TN24 0LZ, United Kingdom

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Communication

Interventions

Interviews as Topic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Data Collection; Epidemiologic Methods; Investigative Techniques; Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms; Quality of Health Care; Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation; Public Health; Environment and Public Health

Central Study Contacts

Daniel Keen

CONTACT

01233633331; danielkeen@nhs.net

Vimal Vasu

CONTACT

01233633331; vimal.vasu@nhs.net

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: OTHER
• Time Perspective: RETROSPECTIVE
• Sponsor Type: OTHER GOV
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: February 15, 2023
• First Posted: September 13, 2023
• Study Start: January 1, 2023
• Primary Completion: January 1, 2026
• Study Completion: January 1, 2026
• Last Updated: April 3, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-04

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

GB (1)