The Association Between Temporomandibular Disorders and Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
Is There a Association Between Temporomandibular Disorders and Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction?
1 other identifier
interventional
23
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD) and Sacroiliac Joint Disfunction (SIJD) and to determine the immediate effect of single-session orofacial manual therapy on SIJD. Patients will be treated for 1 session. The evaluation was planned to be done twice, at the beginning and end of the session.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 25, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 13, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 15, 2023
CompletedSeptember 13, 2023
August 1, 2023
14 days
August 25, 2023
September 6, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Pain Threshold: Digital algometer
The algometer is a reliable instrument for measuring the sensitivity of the masticatory muscles and 1 cm below the Posterior Superior Iliac Spine (PSIS). The measurement will be made at 10 points. A force (Newton in force) of 1 kg (weight in kilogram) per square centimeter (surface area in centimeter square) is applied to the patient for 3 seconds, and this is continued until the patient feels pain (weight and surface area will be combined to report Newton in kg/ cm2). This process will be repeated three times and the average value will be calculated.
Change between baseline (immediately before intervention) and post intervention (immediately after intervention). The intervention is one hour.
Range of Motion
Mouth opening, protrusion and right and left lateral deviation will be measured starting from 0 using a 15 cm ruler. Repeated measuring reduces the standard error of measurement, hence repeated measurements will be also included in our study (three times) with the largest recorded range taken.
Change between baseline (immediately before intervention) and post intervention (immediately after intervention). The intervention is one hour.
First Test for Sacroiliac Joint Disfunction: Distraction Test
The patient lies in a supine position. Direct posterolateral pressure is applied to the bilateral anterior superior iliac spines, thus stressing the anterior sacroiliac ligament. Pathology in the Sacroiliac (SI) joint is considered if pain occurs in the hip.
Change between baseline (immediately before intervention) and post intervention (immediately after intervention). The intervention is one hour.
Second Test for Sacroiliac Joint Disfunction: Compression Test
The patient lies on his side with the affected side on top, with the hip at 45° flexion and the knees at 90° flexion. The physician stands behind the patient and applies pressure to the pelvis over the iliac crest directly toward the contralateral iliac crest. This test can be applied in a supine or prone position. Pathology in the SI joint is considered if pain occurs in the hip.
Change between baseline (immediately before intervention) and post intervention (immediately after intervention). The intervention is one hour.
Third Test for Sacroiliac Joint Disfunction: Thigh Thrust Test
The patient lies in a supine position. The hip is brought to 90º flexion. Pressure is applied directly toward the examination table. Pathology in the SI joint is considered if pain occurs in the hip. Pain provocation is established with hip flexion and adduction.
Change between baseline (immediately before intervention) and post intervention (immediately after intervention). The intervention is one hour.
Fourth Test for Sacroiliac Joint Disfunction: Gaenslen Test
The patient lies in a supine position close to the edge of the bed. The patient draws his leg toward the abdomen so as to place the knee and hip in flexion. The outside leg (closest to the practitioner) is allowed to hang down from the examination table, while the SI joint is contracted by placing pressure on the inside (furthest from the practitioner) iliac crest and outside leg. Pain indicates pathology of the SI joint on the tested side.
Change between baseline (immediately before intervention) and post intervention (immediately after intervention). The intervention is one hour.
Fifth Test for Sacroiliac Joint Disfunction: Sacral Thrust Test
The patient lies in a prone position. The practitioner places one hand on the apex of the sacrum while applying direct pressure with the other hand. Pathology in the SI joint is considered if pain occurs in the hip.
Change between baseline (immediately before intervention) and post intervention (immediately after intervention). The intervention is one hour.
Sixth Test for Sacroiliac Joint Disfunction: Faber (Patrick) Test
The patient lies in a supine position, while the practitioner stands beside the patient and bends the patient's knee, bringing the heel to the opposite knee. With the other hand, the practitioner ensures that the contralateral anterior superior iliac spine remains in a neutral position. The physician applies mild pressure to the bent knee. Pressure is assumed to be applied to the bilateral SI ligaments and hip joints. Pathology in the SI joint is considered if pain occurs in the hip. Pain provocation occurs with flexion, adduction and external rotation of the hip.
Change between baseline (immediately before intervention) and post intervention (immediately after intervention). The intervention is one hour.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for Functional Low Back Pain
Change between baseline (immediately before intervention) and 1 week post intervention. The intervention is one hour.
Study Arms (1)
Treatment Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group will be received orofacial manual therapy as treatment. The number of participants is planned to be 23.
Interventions
As orofacial manual therapy, soft tissue (intraoral and extraoral trigger point therapy and myofascial release of painful muscles) and joint mobilization (caudal and ventro-caudal traction, ventral and mediolateral translation), muscle energy technique, fascia mandibularis release, occipital release and ligamentous treatment was planned.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Volunteered to participate,
- Aged between 18-60 years old,
- Having the diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders (TMB) and sacroiliac joint disfunction (SIJD),
You may not qualify if:
- Having a malignant condition, trauma and surgery of the cranial and cervical region,
- Not being cooperative,
- Regular use of analgesic and anti-inflammatory drugs,
- Having dentofacial anomalies,
- Having active inflammatory arthritis,
- Having metabolic diseases (Gout, osteoporosis, Cushing's disease and hyper/hypo-parathyroidism),
- Having connective tissue, rheumatological (Systemic lupus erythematosus and scleroderma) and hematological disorders (Anemia and leukemia),
- Having a diagnosed psychiatric illness,
- Receiving TMD-related physical therapy less than 6 months ago
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sultan İğrek
Istanbul, 34275, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (18)
Anastassaki Kohler A, Hugoson A, Magnusson T. Prevalence of symptoms indicative of temporomandibular disorders in adults: cross-sectional epidemiological investigations covering two decades. Acta Odontol Scand. 2012 May;70(3):213-23. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2011.634832. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
PMID: 22126531BACKGROUNDKiapour A, Joukar A, Elgafy H, Erbulut DU, Agarwal AK, Goel VK. Biomechanics of the Sacroiliac Joint: Anatomy, Function, Biomechanics, Sexual Dimorphism, and Causes of Pain. Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Feb 10;14(Suppl 1):3-13. doi: 10.14444/6077. eCollection 2020 Feb.
PMID: 32123652BACKGROUNDGregory TM. Temporomandibular disorder associated with sacroiliac sprain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1993 May;16(4):256-65.
PMID: 8340721BACKGROUNDChinappi AS Jr, Getzoff H. Chiropractic/dental cotreatment of lumbosacral pain with temporomandibular joint involvement. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1996 Nov-Dec;19(9):607-12.
PMID: 8976480BACKGROUNDFink M, Wahling K, Stiesch-Scholz M, Tschernitschek H. The functional relationship between the craniomandibular system, cervical spine, and the sacroiliac joint: a preliminary investigation. Cranio. 2003 Jul;21(3):202-8. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2003.11746252.
PMID: 12889677BACKGROUNDTuncer AB, Ergun N, Tuncer AH, Karahan S. Effectiveness of manual therapy and home physical therapy in patients with temporomandibular disorders: A randomized controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2013 Jul;17(3):302-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
PMID: 23768273BACKGROUNDKalamir A, Pollard H, Vitiello A, Bonello R. Intra-oral myofascial therapy for chronic myogenous temporomandibular disorders: a randomized, controlled pilot study. J Man Manip Ther. 2010 Sep;18(3):139-46. doi: 10.1179/106698110X12640740712374.
PMID: 21886424BACKGROUNDvon Piekartz H, Ludtke K. Effect of treatment of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in patients with cervicogenic headache: a single-blind, randomized controlled study. Cranio. 2011 Jan;29(1):43-56. doi: 10.1179/crn.2011.008.
PMID: 21370769BACKGROUNDWalker N, Bohannon RW, Cameron D. Discriminant validity of temporomandibular joint range of motion measurements obtained with a ruler. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2000 Aug;30(8):484-92. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2000.30.8.484.
PMID: 10949505BACKGROUNDTelli H, Telli S, Topal M. The Validity and Reliability of Provocation Tests in the Diagnosis of Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction. Pain Physician. 2018 Jul;21(4):E367-E376.
PMID: 30045603BACKGROUNDRobinson HS, Brox JI, Robinson R, Bjelland E, Solem S, Telje T. The reliability of selected motion- and pain provocation tests for the sacroiliac joint. Man Ther. 2007 Feb;12(1):72-9. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2005.09.004. Epub 2006 Jul 12.
PMID: 16843031BACKGROUNDLaslett M, Young SB, Aprill CN, McDonald B. Diagnosing painful sacroiliac joints: A validity study of a McKenzie evaluation and sacroiliac provocation tests. Aust J Physiother. 2003;49(2):89-97. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60125-2.
PMID: 12775204BACKGROUNDMartin RL, Sekiya JK. The interrater reliability of 4 clinical tests used to assess individuals with musculoskeletal hip pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Feb;38(2):71-7. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2677. Epub 2007 Sep 21.
PMID: 18560194BACKGROUNDCattley P, Winyard J, Trevaskis J, Eaton S. Validity and reliability of clinical tests for the sacroiliac joint. A review of literature. Australas Chiropr Osteopathy. 2002 Nov;10(2):73-80.
PMID: 17987177BACKGROUNDLaslett M, Aprill CN, McDonald B, Young SB. Diagnosis of sacroiliac joint pain: validity of individual provocation tests and composites of tests. Man Ther. 2005 Aug;10(3):207-18. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2005.01.003.
PMID: 16038856BACKGROUNDFairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980 Aug;66(8):271-3. No abstract available.
PMID: 6450426BACKGROUNDFritz JM, Irrgang JJ. A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Phys Ther. 2001 Feb;81(2):776-88. doi: 10.1093/ptj/81.2.776.
PMID: 11175676BACKGROUNDYakut E, Duger T, Oksuz C, Yorukan S, Ureten K, Turan D, Frat T, Kiraz S, Krd N, Kayhan H, Yakut Y, Guler C. Validation of the Turkish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Mar 1;29(5):581-5; discussion 585. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000113869.13209.03.
PMID: 15129077BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Tugba Kuru Colak, Asst. Prof
Marmara University Institute of Health Sciences
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 25, 2023
First Posted
September 13, 2023
Study Start
September 1, 2023
Primary Completion
September 15, 2023
Study Completion
October 15, 2023
Last Updated
September 13, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Informed Consent Form (ICF), Clinical Study Report (CSR) might be considered to be shared with clinicians studying in the same field one year after the publication of the study.