Detecting and Assessing Leg and Foot Stress Fractures Using Photon Counting CT
FootPCCT
Assessing Patients With Suspected Stress or Insufficiency Fracture of the Lower Extremity With Photon-Counting-Computed-Tomography
1 other identifier
observational
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Stress fractures (fatigue or insufficiency fracture) are caused by the mismatch between bone strength and chronic stress applied to the bone. The vast majority of these fractures occur in the lower extremity. Early-stage diagnosis is crucial to optimize patient care. Appropriate imaging is relevant in confirming diagnosis after clinical suspicion of stress fractures. Radiographs have low sensitivity, so a relevant number of fractures go undetected. MRI has a high sensitivity, but its availability is limited, and its respective examination time is prolonged. This study investigates the diagnostic accuracy of PCCT in lower extremity stress fractures as a dose-saving technology, guaranteeing an examination according to the ALARA-principle (as low as reasonably achievable).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Sep 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 21, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 6, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2025
CompletedMarch 28, 2024
March 1, 2024
4 months
August 21, 2023
March 27, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Presence of a fracture
Presence/absence of a fracture
Day 1, 4weeks follow up assessment
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Presence of bone edema
Day 1, 4weeks follow up assessment
Presence of soft tissue edema
Day1, 4weeks follow up assessment
Other Outcomes (6)
Pain localization
Day 1, 4 weeks follow up assessment, 12 weeks follow up assessment
Pain character
Day 1, 4 weeks follow up assessment, 12 weeks follow up assessment
Pain intensity
Day 1, 4 weeks follow up assessment, 12 weeks follow up assessment
- +3 more other outcomes
Interventions
Initial and follow up (after 4 weeks) PCCT acquisition of the affected area of the lower extremity. Image acquisition will be performed on the PCCT
Eligibility Criteria
In cooperation with the Foot Clinic at the Balgrist University Hospital Zurich, potential study candidates with suspected stress fracture who will undergo an MRI to confirm the diagnosis are prospectively screened and proposed to join the study.
You may qualify if:
- ≥ 16 years of age. Minor study subjects can have an additional signature by the parent or legal guardian
- Clinically suspected stress or insufficiency fracture of the lower extremity
- Written consent of study participation
- Patients who will have an MRI to confirm the diagnosis of a suspected stress fracture
You may not qualify if:
- \< 16 years of age
- Pregnancy
- Metal implants
- Postoperative situation
- Infection or tumorous disease affecting the lower extremity
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Balgrist University Hospital
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, 8008, Switzerland
Related Publications (15)
Palmer W, Bancroft L, Bonar F, Choi JA, Cotten A, Griffith JF, Robinson P, Pfirrmann CWA. Glossary of terms for musculoskeletal radiology. Skeletal Radiol. 2020 Jul;49(Suppl 1):1-33. doi: 10.1007/s00256-020-03465-1. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
PMID: 32488336BACKGROUNDLassus J, Tulikoura I, Konttinen YT, Salo J, Santavirta S. Bone stress injuries of the lower extremity: a review. Acta Orthop Scand. 2002 Jun;73(3):359-68. doi: 10.1080/000164702320155392.
PMID: 12143987BACKGROUNDWright AA, Hegedus EJ, Lenchik L, Kuhn KJ, Santiago L, Smoliga JM. Diagnostic Accuracy of Various Imaging Modalities for Suspected Lower Extremity Stress Fractures: A Systematic Review With Evidence-Based Recommendations for Clinical Practice. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jan;44(1):255-63. doi: 10.1177/0363546515574066. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
PMID: 25805712BACKGROUNDWortman JR, Uyeda JW, Fulwadhva UP, Sodickson AD. Dual-Energy CT for Abdominal and Pelvic Trauma. Radiographics. 2018 Mar-Apr;38(2):586-602. doi: 10.1148/rg.2018170058.
PMID: 29528816BACKGROUNDCabarrus MC, Ambekar A, Lu Y, Link TM. MRI and CT of insufficiency fractures of the pelvis and the proximal femur. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Oct;191(4):995-1001. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3714.
PMID: 18806133BACKGROUNDGosangi B, Mandell JC, Weaver MJ, Uyeda JW, Smith SE, Sodickson AD, Khurana B. Bone Marrow Edema at Dual-Energy CT: A Game Changer in the Emergency Department. Radiographics. 2020 May-Jun;40(3):859-874. doi: 10.1148/rg.2020190173.
PMID: 32364883BACKGROUNDGrunz JP, Sailer L, Lang P, Schule S, Kunz AS, Beer M, Hackenbroch C. Dual-energy CT in sacral fragility fractures: defining a cut-off Hounsfield unit value for the presence of traumatic bone marrow edema in patients with osteoporosis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jul 29;23(1):724. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05690-2.
PMID: 35906573BACKGROUNDHenes FO, Nuchtern JV, Groth M, Habermann CR, Regier M, Rueger JM, Adam G, Grossterlinden LG. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Multidetector Computed Tomography in the detection of pelvic fractures. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Sep;81(9):2337-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.07.012. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
PMID: 21924851BACKGROUNDBongartz T, Glazebrook KN, Kavros SJ, Murthy NS, Merry SP, Franz WB 3rd, Michet CJ, Veetil BM, Davis JM 3rd, Mason TG 2nd, Warrington KJ, Ytterberg SR, Matteson EL, Crowson CS, Leng S, McCollough CH. Dual-energy CT for the diagnosis of gout: an accuracy and diagnostic yield study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Jun;74(6):1072-7. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-205095. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
PMID: 24671771BACKGROUNDHidas G, Eliahou R, Duvdevani M, Coulon P, Lemaitre L, Gofrit ON, Pode D, Sosna J. Determination of renal stone composition with dual-energy CT: in vivo analysis and comparison with x-ray diffraction. Radiology. 2010 Nov;257(2):394-401. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100249. Epub 2010 Aug 31.
PMID: 20807846BACKGROUNDEsquivel A, Ferrero A, Mileto A, Baffour F, Horst K, Rajiah PS, Inoue A, Leng S, McCollough C, Fletcher JG. Photon-Counting Detector CT: Key Points Radiologists Should Know. Korean J Radiol. 2022 Sep;23(9):854-865. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0377.
PMID: 36047540BACKGROUNDMarcus RP, Fletcher JG, Ferrero A, Leng S, Halaweish AF, Gutjahr R, Vrtiska TJ, Wells ML, Enders FT, McCollough CH. Detection and Characterization of Renal Stones by Using Photon-Counting-based CT. Radiology. 2018 Nov;289(2):436-442. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018180126. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
PMID: 30084728BACKGROUNDTenforde AS, Fredericson M. Influence of sports participation on bone health in the young athlete: a review of the literature. PM R. 2011 Sep;3(9):861-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.05.019.
PMID: 21944303BACKGROUNDGrunz JP, Heidenreich JF, Lennartz S, Weighardt JP, Bley TA, Ergun S, Petritsch B, Huflage H. Spectral Shaping Via Tin Prefiltration in Ultra-High-Resolution Photon-Counting and Energy-Integrating Detector CT of the Temporal Bone. Invest Radiol. 2022 Dec 1;57(12):819-825. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000901. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
PMID: 35776435BACKGROUNDGrunz JP, Petritsch B, Luetkens KS, Kunz AS, Lennartz S, Ergun S, Bley TA, Huflage H. Ultra-Low-Dose Photon-Counting CT Imaging of the Paranasal Sinus With Tin Prefiltration: How Low Can We Go? Invest Radiol. 2022 Nov 1;57(11):728-733. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000887. Epub 2022 May 6.
PMID: 35703452BACKGROUND
Related Links
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stephan Wirth, PD Dr.med.
Balgrist University Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 13 Weeks
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 21, 2023
First Posted
September 6, 2023
Study Start
September 1, 2023
Primary Completion
December 31, 2023
Study Completion
January 30, 2025
Last Updated
March 28, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share