cOCT Versus LC-OCT for Diagnosing Basal Cell Carcinoma: a Diagnostic Cohort Study
1 other identifier
observational
197
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common form of cancer among the Caucasian population. Equivocal BCC lesions are usually diagnosed by means of a punch biopsy, but since the last few decades, non-invasive imaging techniques for the diagnosis of BCC gained popularity within the field of dermatology. Conventional optical coherence tomography (cOCT) is an example of a non-invasive imaging technique. Recent studies revealed that OCT assessors may achieve high diagnostic certainty and accuracy for diagnosing BCC. However, cOCT has a limited axial and lateral resolution and can therefore only visualize the gross architecture of the skin. It has been proposed that the diagnostic certainty and accuracy of cOCT could be optimized by improving the resolution. Line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) is a new non-invasive imaging technique that provides tridimensional images of the skin with a cellular resolution. Although the resolution of LC-OCT is superior to cOCT, the penetration depth of LC-OCT (500µm) is limited compared to that of cOCT (1.0-1.5mm). In the proposed study, we aim to assess whether LC-OCT is superior to cOCT in terms of diagnostic accuracy for diagnosing BCC in equivocal BCC lesions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Sep 2023
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 29, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 6, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2024
CompletedFebruary 16, 2024
February 1, 2024
5 months
August 29, 2023
February 15, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic accuracy of cOCT and LC-OCT
Diagnostic parameters such as sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and DOR will be evaluated for diagnosing BCC in patients with equivocal lesions and compared between both imaging devices.
Measured before september 1st 2024
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic accuracy for BCC subtyping on cOCT and LC-OCT
Measured before september 1st 2024
Study Arms (1)
Patients with equivocal BCC lesions
Patients with equivocal BCC lesions (18+ years) who will undergo biopsy conform regular care will undergo a cOCT and LC-OCT scan.
Interventions
cOCT: conventional optical coherence tomography (cOCT) is an established imaging modality within dermatology that enables visualization of the architecture of the skin with a penetration depth of 1.0 - 1.5mm. LC-OCT: Line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) is a new emerging diagnostic modality within the field of dermatology. LC-OCT enables tridimensional imaging of the skin with a cellular resolution and BCC features on LC-OCT have been described. However, the penetration depth of LC-OCT (500µm), is limited compared to the penetration depth of cOCT (1.0-1.5mm)
Eligibility Criteria
The study population will consist of patients visiting the outpatient clinic of Maastricht University Medical Center+ (MUMC+). All included patients (18+) will undergo a punch biopsie for their equivocal BCC lesion conform regular care.
You may qualify if:
- Patients (18+) with equivocal BCC lesions undergoing biopsy conform regular care
You may not qualify if:
- Patients unable to sign informed consent
- Patients with clinically evident BCC lesions who do not undergo biopsy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Maastricht UMC+
Maastricht, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 29, 2023
First Posted
September 6, 2023
Study Start
September 1, 2023
Primary Completion
February 1, 2024
Study Completion
September 1, 2024
Last Updated
February 16, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02