Added Value of OCT for Diagnosing Recurrent BCC After Non-invasive Treatment
TOBI
Optical Coherence Tomography for Diagnosing Recurrent Basal Cell Carcinoma After Non-invasive Treatment
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Superficial basal cell carcinoma (sBCC) can be treated non-invasively, but follow-up is necessary because lesions can reoccur. This study aims to evaluate the additional value of optical coherence tomography (OCT) for the detection of recurrent BCC lesions, that may remain unrecognized by clinical and dermoscopic examination (CDE). This study compared the diagnostic accuracy of CDE and CDE combined with OCT for detection of recurrent basal cell carcinoma (BCC) after non-invasive treatment of sBCC.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 4, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 4, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 29, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 14, 2022
CompletedOctober 14, 2022
September 1, 2022
1.1 years
September 29, 2022
October 12, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The added value of OCT for the detection of recurrent BCC
The investigators evaluated the difference in sensitivity between CDE and CDE + OCT
1- 56 months post treatment
Secondary Outcomes (2)
The number of false-positive OCT test results
1- 56 months post treatment
Subtyping recurrent BCC by OCT
1- 56 months post treatment
Interventions
In case of suspicion of recurrence or a voluntary control biopsy; a punch biopsy (3mm) was obtained conform regular care.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Non-invasively treated sBCC patients
- + years of age
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to sign informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Maastricht University Medical Center+
Maastricht, Limbrug, 6202AZ, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The OCT assessor was blinded to the histopathological examination of the independent dermatopathologist, whereas the dermatopathologist was blinded to the OCT assessment.
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 29, 2022
First Posted
October 14, 2022
Study Start
January 15, 2021
Primary Completion
March 4, 2022
Study Completion
March 4, 2022
Last Updated
October 14, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-09