Study Stopped
Changed study design and it is no longer a clinical trial.
Role Of Sensitivity to neuroEndocrine Systems in Social Decisions
ROSES
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this research study is to investigate how personality traits and neuroendocrine systems relate to decision-making patterns in individuals 18-45 years old. The main question it aims to answer is how neuroendocrine activity impacts decision-making. This study has two components. First, there will be an online session that participants complete to consent into the study, complete self-report surveys and a cognitive assessment, and confirm their eligibility for the second part of the study. If eligible to continue, participants will complete one in-person experiment session, during which they will complete self-report measures and a decision-making task. During the in-person session, participants will be randomly assigned (like flipping a coin) to ingest either a placebo (non-active) or the combination of hydrocortisone and yohimbine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Jul 2024
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 22, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2025
CompletedJune 5, 2024
August 1, 2023
1 year
August 22, 2023
June 3, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Goal-directed decision-making in the Social Decision Tree Task (SDTT)
Measured by choice behavior in SDTT, which is based on the decision tree framework. After each action, participants receive feedback about the effect of that action and the extent to which it added to or took away from their points. If participants make a given choice, the subsequent actions that they can choose are different than if they were to initially make a different choice. An action in SDTT is goal-directed if the possible net gain an individual can earn before the end of the current epoch (a "day" in the SDTT) is equal to or higher than the amount they could gain by choosing the alternative action. The investigators will subset trials so that 1 is coded as choosing the immediately valuable action at the expense of the optimal and 0 is coded as choosing the optimal at the expense of the immediately valuable action. This outcome variable is binary. An action is defined as social if it is paired with a visual cue with a face on it and non-social if not.
Collected for 30 minutes ~1 hour into Session 2, which takes place on approximately Day 7 of the study
Change in salivary cortisol
The investigators will collect a saliva sample immediately before participants ingest the drugs (or placebos, if in the control condition). They will collect a second saliva sample 45 minutes after the drug (or placebo) ingestion. They will measure cortisol levels in both samples through an assay. The investigators will calculate the change in salivary cortisol by subtracting the measured cortisol in the first saliva sample (collected pre-drug/placebo ingestion) from the measured cortisol in the second saliva sample (collected 45 minutes after the drug/placebo ingestion). Salivary cortisol is measured as nmol/L. Salivary cortisol expected to generally be below 200 nmol/L.
Collected immediately before the drug/placebo administration (~5 minutes into the session) and 45 minutes after the drug/placebo administration (~50 minutes into the session) in Session 2, which takes place on approximately Day 7
Pupil diameter during SDTT
The outcome will be measured using eye tracking technology.
Collected for 30 minutes ~1 hour into Session 2, which takes place on approximately Day 7 of the study
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in valence, measured via the affect grid
Collected immediately before the first saliva collection in Session 2 (~5 minutes into the session) and 45 minutes after the second saliva collection in Session 2 (~50 minutes into the session), which takes place on approximately Day 7
Change in arousal, measured via the affect grid
Collected immediately before the first saliva collection in Session 2 (~5 minutes into the session) and 45 minutes after the second saliva collection in Session 2 (~50 minutes into the session), which takes place on approximately Day 7
Change in stress, measured via the subjective stress scale
Collected immediately before the first saliva collection in Session 2 (~5 minutes into the session) and 45 minutes after the second saliva collection in Session 2 (~50 minutes into the session), which takes place on approximately Day 7
Other Outcomes (15)
Personality Assessment Inventory-Borderline Scale (PAI-BOR) score
Session 1, which takes place on Day 0
Interbeat Interval (IBI) time series during SDTT
Collected approximately 1 hour into Session 2 for 30 minutes (which takes place on approximately Day 7)
Heart rate variability (HRV) during SDTT
Collected approximately 1 hour into Session 2 for 30 minutes (which takes place on approximately Day 7)
- +12 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Hydrocortisone + Yohimbine
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will ingest hydrocortisone and yohimbine during Session 2 approximately 10 minutes into the session.
Placebo + Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants will orally ingest two placebos during Session 2 approximately 10 minutes into the session.
Interventions
Hydrocortisone 20 mg capsule will be administered orally.
Yohimbine 20 mg capsule will be administered orally.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) group:
- Score of 38 or higher on PAI-BOR
- Participants in the BPD group will be primarily recruited from the two DEPENd lab studies that maintain large samples of BPD participants. To ensure maximal similarity between BPD participants recruited from other DEPENd lab studies and BPD participants recruited through other recruitment sources, the investigators will use the same criteria for the BPD group in the ROSES study as the criteria used in the other DEPENd lab studies. BPD participants in the two DEPENd lab studies from which the investigators will be recruiting must meet the following criteria:
- + BPD symptoms, one of which must be affective instability, per clinical interview
- Participants must score at least 80 on the Reynolds Intellectual Screening Test (RIST).
- Matched Control (MC) group:
- Score of 12 or lower on PAI-BOR
- Score below 50th percentile on WHODAS
- Ages 18-45
- Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
- Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and lifestyle considerations and availability for the duration of the study
- Willingness to participate in all components of the study
- Access to necessary resources for participating in the virtual Session 1 (i.e., computer, smartphone, internet access)
- Participants must be able to speak, understand and read English.
- Participants must have at least 20/40 visual acuity (correct or uncorrected).
You may not qualify if:
- Current use of medications that interact adversely with yohimbine
- a. Iobenguane radiopharmaceutical products
- Current use of medications that interact adversely with hydrocortisone
- Aldesleukin
- Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Products
- Cladribine
- Dengue Tetravalent Vaccine
- Desmopressin
- Indium 111 Capromab Pendetide
- Macimorelin
- Mifamurtide
- MiFEPRIStone
- Natalizumab
- Pimecrolimus:
- Ruxolitinib (Topical)
- +40 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514, United States
Related Publications (1)
Huys QJ, Eshel N, O'Nions E, Sheridan L, Dayan P, Roiser JP. Bonsai trees in your head: how the pavlovian system sculpts goal-directed choices by pruning decision trees. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(3):e1002410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002410. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
PMID: 22412360BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael N Hallquist, PhD
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 22, 2023
First Posted
August 31, 2023
Study Start
July 1, 2024
Primary Completion
July 1, 2025
Study Completion
July 1, 2025
Last Updated
June 5, 2024
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Beginning 9 and continuing for 36 months following publication
- Access Criteria
- Investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an IRB, IEC, or REB and an executed data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC).