NCT06018298

Brief Summary

The model of care for forensic psychiatry in Italy was changed by law (Law 81/2014) so that the six legacy secure forensic hospitals (Judicial Psychiatric Hospitals, OPG) were closed and new secure community residences for the execution of security measures (REMS) were opened in each of the 20 regions of Italy. This transition was in place by 2015. This observational study evaluates the health gains for patients both previously in OPGs and those admitted first to REMS. Health gains assessed include recovery measured by symptoms, function, need for therapeutic security and recovery of legal autonomy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
245

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2018

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2018

Completed
4.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 3, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 3, 2022

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 15, 2023

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 30, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

September 6, 2023

Status Verified

August 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

4.4 years

First QC Date

August 15, 2023

Last Update Submit

August 31, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Forensicsocial dangerousnesstherapeutic security

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • length of stay in REMS

    time (days) from admission to move out of REMS

    date of admission to REMS through study completion, an average of 18 months

  • Functional recovery

    change in GAF over time

    Date of first, second and third assessments in REMS through study completion, an average of 18 months

  • violence while in REMS

    MOAS in the intervals between first, second and third assessments in REMS an average of 18 months

    Date of first, second and third assessments in REMS through study completion, an average of 18 months

  • Readmission to REMS

    time (days) until readmission to REMS following discharge from REMS an average of 18 months

    date of discharge from REMS to date of readmission to REMS, if any.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • conditional discharge

    date of assessment to date of conditional discharge an average of 18 months

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Death

    from date of admission to date of death while in REMS, if any up to two years

Study Arms (2)

Therapeutic security

assessment of residents in REMS for need for therapeutic security, treatment response relevant to forensic need and forensic recovery.

Other: Treatment as usual (TAU)

Risk Measures of Need (RISKMON)

assessed symptom severity, risk and protective factors for violence, global function, personality factors.

Other: Treatment as usual (TAU)

Interventions

the components of treatment as usual (TAU) are summarised and assessed by the items of the DUNDRUM-3: physical health, mental health, substance misuse, problem behaviours, self care and activities of daily living, education occupation and creativity, family and intimacy.

Risk Measures of Need (RISKMON)Therapeutic security

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Residents admitted to Residences for the Execution of Security Measures (REMS) under court orders: found by the court to be partially responsible (Penal Code 89) or completely not criminally responsible (Penal Code 88) for a crime and also found socially dangerous (Penal Code 203).

You may qualify if:

  • admitted to REMS
  • voluntarily consents to participate

You may not qualify if:

  • MMSE less than 19

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Bari

Bari, 70124, Italy

Location

Related Publications (16)

  • Carabellese F, Parente L, Kennedy HG. Reform of Forensic Mental Health Services in Italy: Stigma and Blaming the Messenger: Hermenoia. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2024 Nov;68(15):1505-1524. doi: 10.1177/0306624X221113531. Epub 2022 Jul 21.

    PMID: 35861358BACKGROUND
  • Flynn G, O'Neill C, McInerney C, Kennedy HG. The DUNDRUM-1 structured professional judgment for triage to appropriate levels of therapeutic security: retrospective-cohort validation study. BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Mar 16;11:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-43.

    PMID: 21410967BACKGROUND
  • Jeandarme I, Habets P, Kennedy H. Structured versus unstructured judgment: DUNDRUM-1 compared to court decisions. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 May-Jun;64:205-210. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 May 1.

    PMID: 31122631BACKGROUND
  • KENNEDY, H. G. 2002. Therapeutic uses of security: mapping forensic mental health services by stratifying risk. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 8, 433-443.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.8.6.433

    BACKGROUND
  • O'Neill C, Smith D, Caddow M, Duffy F, Hickey P, Fitzpatrick M, Caddow F, Cronin T, Joynt M, Azvee Z, Gallagher B, Kehoe C, Maddock C, O'Keeffe B, Brennan L, Davoren M, Owens E, Mullaney R, Keevans L, Maher R, Kennedy HG. STRESS-testing clinical activity and outcomes for a combined prison in-reach and court liaison service: a 3-year observational study of 6177 consecutive male remands. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2016 Oct 11;10:67. doi: 10.1186/s13033-016-0097-z. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 27766115BACKGROUND
  • Williams HK, Senanayke M, Ross CC, Bates R, Davoren M. Security needs among patients referred for high secure care in Broadmoor Hospital England. BJPsych Open. 2020 Jun 2;6(4):e55. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.35.

    PMID: 32482202BACKGROUND
  • Carabellese F, Felthous AR. Closing Italian Forensic Psychiatry Hospitals in Favor of Treating Insanity Acquittees in the Community. Behav Sci Law. 2016 Mar;34(2-3):444-59. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2234.

    PMID: 27256003BACKGROUND
  • Catanesi R, Mandarelli G, Ferracuti S, Valerio A, Carabellese F (2019). The new Italian residential forensic psychiatric system (REMS). A one-year population study. Italian Journal of Criminology - Special Number, Vol.13.

    BACKGROUND
  • Cura e controllo. Come cambia la pericolosità sociale psichiatrica R Catanesi, FF Carabellese, I Grattagliano - Giornale Italiano di Psicopatologia, 2009

    BACKGROUND
  • Carabellese F, Felthous AR, Rossetto I, La Tegola D, Franconi F, Catanesi R. Female Residents with Psychopathy in a High-Security Italian Hospital. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2018 Jun;46(2):171-178. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.003744-18.

    PMID: 30026395BACKGROUND
  • Comportamento violento in una coorte di pazienti psichiatrici: rischio psicosociale e fattori protettivi F Carabellese, C Candelli, D La Tegola, R Buzzerio… - Rassegna italiana di criminologia, 2015

    BACKGROUND
  • Gualtieri G, Traverso S, Pozza A, Ferretti F, Carabellese F, Gusinu R, Coluccia A. Clinical risk management in High-Security Forensic Psychiatry Residences. Protecting patients and health professionals: perspectives and critical issues of the Law 81/2014. Clin Ter. 2020 Mar-Apr;171(2):e97-e100. doi: 10.7417/CT.2020.2196.

    PMID: 32141478BACKGROUND
  • OPG di chiusura: strumenti diagnostici per criminali malati di mente socialmente pericolosi. Dalla valutazione medico-psichiatrica al trattamento F Carabellese - Rassegna Italiana di Criminologia, 2017

    BACKGROUND
  • Assessing the needs of patients in secure settings: a multi-disciplinary approach P Pierzchniak, F Farnham, N Taranto, D Bull, H Gill… - The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 1999

    BACKGROUND
  • Models of care in forensic psychiatry HG Kennedy - BJPsych Advances, 2022

    BACKGROUND
  • Parente L, Carabellese F, Felthous A, La Tegola D, Davoren M, Kennedy HG, Carabellese FF. Italian Evaluation and Excellence in REMS (ITAL-EE-REMS): appropriate placement of forensic patients in REMS forensic facilities. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2024 Nov 2;18(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13033-024-00647-5.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Mental DisordersSchizophreniaPersonality DisordersAntisocial Personality DisorderIntellectual Disability

Interventions

Therapeutics

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeurodevelopmental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Felice F Carabellese, MD

    University of Bari

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Lia Parente, PsyD

    University of Bari

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Harry G Kennedy, MD

    University of Dublin Trinity College (TCD)

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Mary Davoren, MD

    University of Dublin Trinity College (TCD)

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Full Professor of Forensic Psychopathology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 15, 2023

First Posted

August 30, 2023

Study Start

July 1, 2018

Primary Completion

December 3, 2022

Study Completion

December 3, 2022

Last Updated

September 6, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

In view of the sensitive nature of the data, aggregated anonymised data may be provided to accredited researchers on a case by case basis.

Locations