Middle School Teacher Module for a Brief Bullying Intervention Program
Development, Acceptability, and Short-Term Outcomes of a Teacher Module for a Brief, Bullying Bystander Intervention for Middle School Students in Rural, Low-Income Communities
1 other identifier
interventional
18
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the feasibility and short-term outcomes of a teacher training designed as a companion module to a bullying bystander intervention (STAC) for middle school students in rural communities. The aim of this project is to provide a brief, low-cost intervention that can be easily disseminated as part of a school-based bullying prevention program to address this important public health problem.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 21, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 24, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 24, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 22, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 30, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 1, 2024
CompletedOctober 1, 2024
September 1, 2024
3 days
August 22, 2023
September 25, 2023
September 26, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Knowledge and Confidence to Support Defenders
Teacher-Advocates Pre- and Post-Scale (TAPPS) Knowledge and confidence to support defenders was measured using the TAPPS. The TAPPS is an 11 item survey that measures knowledge of buying behaviors, knowledge of how to support students using the STAC strategies, and confidence supporting students who intervene in bullying situations. Items are rated on a 4-point Likert Scale ranging from 1 (Totally Disagree) to 4 (Totally Agree) and were summed to compute a total scale score. Minimum =11; Maximum = 44 Higher scores are better outcomes
pre-training (baseline); immediate post-training (50 minutes)
Confidence Managing Bullying
Teacher's Attitudes about Bullying Questionnaire Confidence about managing bullying was measured using the Teacher's Attitudes about Bullying Questionnaire. This questionnaire is a 22 item survey. The 3-item Confidence in Managing Bullying Subscale was used. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert Scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree) and are summed to compute a total scale score. Minimum = 3; Maximum = 15 Higher scores are better outcomes
pre-training (baseline); immediate post-training (50 minutes)
Comfort Managing Bullying
National Education Association Bullying Survey Comfort with managing bullying was measured using items from the National Education Association Bullying Survey. Participants were asked "How comfortable would the participant feel intervening when the participant sees the following bullying behaviors?" followed by five types of bullying (a) Physical, (b) Verbal, (c) Relational, (d) Cyberbullying , and (e) Sexting. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert Scale ranging from 1 (Very Uncomfortable) to 5 (Very Comfortable) and are summed to compute a total scale score. Minimum = 5; Maximum = 25 Higher scores are better outcomes
pre-training (baseline); immediate post-training (50 minutes)
Bullying Self-Efficacy
Bullying Self-Efficacy Teachers' self-efficacy in handling bullying situations was measured by two items from the National Education Association Bullying Survey. The items are rated on a 4-point Likert Scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 4 (Strongly Agree) and are summed to compute a total scale score. Minimum = 2; Maximum = 8 Higher scores are better outcomes
pre-training (baseline); immediate post-training (50 minutes)
Number of Participants Reporting a Score of 4 or 5 on Intention to Use Teacher STAC Strategies
The intention to use Teacher STAC strategies was measured using an adapted version of the Use of STAC Strategies for students. Items were adapted from the student version to be appropriate for teachers. The 4-item measures asks teachers "How likely the participant is to support students using these strategies to intervene in bullying in the future?: a) Stealing the Show - support students using humor or distraction to get the attention away from the bullying situation, b) Turning it Over - support a student who reported bullying to the participant or supporting students to report to a principal or School Resource Officer (SRO), c) Accompanying Others - support students who reach out to the student who was the target of bullying, or d) Coaching Compassion - support students who help the student who bullied develop empathy for the target." Items are rated on a 5-point Likert Scale ranging from 1 (Very Unlikely) to 5 (Very Likely).
immediate post-training (50 minutes)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants Reporting a Score of 3 or 4 on Acceptability and Relevance of the Teacher STAC Training
immediate post-training (50 minutes)
Study Arms (1)
STAC Teacher Module
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
The STAC Teacher Module is a 30-minute presentation that includes normative feedback, didactic information, a review of the student STAC strategies and corresponding strategies teachers can use to support students who act as defenders, and information about "perceptions vs. facts" about bullying.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Being a teacher of an adolescent enrolled in grades 6, 7, or 8 in a participating middle school in Idaho.
- Speaks and reads English.
- Consents to participate.
You may not qualify if:
- Speaks and reads only a language other than English.
- Does not consent for participation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Boise State Universitylead
- Mental Research Institutecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Boise State Univerity
Boise, Idaho, 83725, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Aida Midgett
- Organization
- Boise State University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 22, 2023
First Posted
August 30, 2023
Study Start
January 21, 2022
Primary Completion
January 24, 2022
Study Completion
January 24, 2022
Last Updated
October 1, 2024
Results First Posted
October 1, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share