Efficacy of Ethyl Chloride Topical Anesthesia Application on the Pain Perception During Intra-oral Injections in Children in Comparison to Benzocaine Gel.
1 other identifier
interventional
42
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this single-blinded randomized controlled trial is to compare pain perception during buccal infiltration using indirect EC spray and topical anesthesia and BC 20% topical gel, among seven to 10-year-old school children who attended Pediatric Dentistry Department at Dubai Dental Hospital (DDH), Mohammed Bin Rashid University (MBRU) in Dubai, the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are: • How effective is the indirect application of EC topical spray anesthesia on pain perception during intraoral buccal injection in children in comparsion to BC 20%? Researchers will compare efficacy of 20% Benzocaine (BC) gel and indirect application of Ethyl Chloride (EC) spray to see if reducing pain perception during local anesthesia infiltration.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 5, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 25, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 24, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2023
CompletedAugust 25, 2023
August 1, 2023
2 months
July 5, 2023
August 22, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Heart rate
Each participant's heart rate will be recorded immediately before and after the injection using an FDA-approved pulse oximeter.
5-10 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Sound, Eye, Motor (SEM) Index
5-10 minutes
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
5-10 minutes
Face Pain Scale
5-10 minutes
Study Arms (2)
(Group A) Ethyl Chloride (EC)
EXPERIMENTALTopical application for 30 sec.
(Group B) Benzocaine gel 20% (BC)
ACTIVE COMPARATORBC 20% Topical gel application for 30 sec and left for 1 minute.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy children (ASA I) aged between 7 - 10 years old.
- Needing any maxillary buccal infiltration (anterior, middle, posterior)
- Had no prior history of local anesthesia.
- Frankl behavior III or IV
- Not taking any painkillers, or other drugs that would influence with their pain perception.
You may not qualify if:
- History of a medically compromised condition and intellectual disability. § Any allergy to local anesthesia.
- Active pathology at the site of injection.
- Prior history of intra-oral injection.
- Frankl behavior I or II.
- Children/parents not willing to participate in the study. § Needle phobia.
- Patients require treatment under conscious sedation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Mohammed Bin Rashid University Of Medicine and Health Sciences
Multiple Locations, United Arab Emirates
Related Publications (20)
Dasarraju RK, Svsg N. Comparative efficacy of three topical anesthetics on 7-11-year-old children: a randomized clinical study. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Feb;20(1):29-37. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.1.29. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
PMID: 32158957RESULTLakshmanan L, Ravindran V. Efficacy of Cryotherapy Application on the Pain Perception during Intraoral Injection: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Sep-Oct;14(5):616-620. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2032.
PMID: 34934271RESULTChan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gotzsche PC, Krleza-Jeric K, Hrobjartsson A, Mann H, Dickersin K, Berlin JA, Dore CJ, Parulekar WR, Summerskill WS, Groves T, Schulz KF, Sox HC, Rockhold FW, Rennie D, Moher D. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):200-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.
PMID: 23295957RESULTKreider KA, Stratmann RG, Milano M, Agostini FG, Munsell M. Reducing children's injection pain: lidocaine patches versus topical benzocaine gel. Pediatr Dent. 2001 Jan-Feb;23(1):19-23.
PMID: 11242725RESULTGill CJ, Orr DL 2nd. A double-blind crossover comparison of topical anesthetics. J Am Dent Assoc. 1979 Feb;98(2):213-4. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1979.0476.
PMID: 370178RESULTLathwal G, Pandit IK, Gugnani N, Gupta M. Efficacy of Different Precooling Agents and Topical Anesthetics on the Pain Perception during Intraoral Injection: A Comparative Clinical Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 May-Aug;8(2):119-22. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1296. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
PMID: 26379379RESULTHindocha N, Manhem F, Backryd E, Bagesund M. Ice versus lidocaine 5% gel for topical anaesthesia of oral mucosa - a randomized cross-over study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Dec 16;19(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0902-8.
PMID: 31842771RESULTHersh EV, Houpt MI, Cooper SA, Feldman RS, Wolff MS, Levin LM. Analgesic efficacy and safety of an intraoral lidocaine patch. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996 Nov;127(11):1626-34; quiz 1665-6. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0098.
PMID: 8952239RESULTAmado A, Sood A, Taylor JS. Contact allergy to lidocaine: a report of sixteen cases. Dermatitis. 2007 Dec;18(4):215-20. doi: 10.2310/6620.2007.06059.
PMID: 18021602RESULTSilver K, Silver J. The place of James Arnott (1797-1883) in the development of local anaesthesia in dentistry. Br Dent J. 2016 Mar 11;220(5):249-52. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.179.
PMID: 26964600RESULTDavoudi A, Rismanchian M, Akhavan A, Nosouhian S, Bajoghli F, Haghighat A, Arbabzadeh F, Samimi P, Fiez A, Shadmehr E, Tabari K, Jahadi S. A brief review on the efficacy of different possible and nonpharmacological techniques in eliminating discomfort of local anesthesia injection during dental procedures. Anesth Essays Res. 2016 Jan-Apr;10(1):13-6. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.167846.
PMID: 26957683RESULTErnst E, Fialka V. Ice freezes pain? A review of the clinical effectiveness of analgesic cold therapy. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1994 Jan;9(1):56-9. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(94)90150-3.
PMID: 8169463RESULTMalanga GA, Yan N, Stark J. Mechanisms and efficacy of heat and cold therapies for musculoskeletal injury. Postgrad Med. 2015 Jan;127(1):57-65. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2015.992719. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
PMID: 25526231RESULTKosaraju A, Vandewalle KS. A comparison of a refrigerant and a topical anesthetic gel as preinjection anesthetics: a clinical evaluation. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009 Jan;140(1):68-72; quiz 112-3. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0020.
PMID: 19119169RESULTDiMarco AC, Wetmore AO. Clinical Comparison: Fast-Acting and Traditional Topical Dental Anesthetic. Anesth Prog. 2016 Summer;63(2):55-61. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-63.2.55.
PMID: 27269661RESULTBallesteros-Pena S, Fernandez-Aedo I, Vallejo-De la Hoz G; en representacion del Grupo de Trabajo DIASURE. [Ethyl chloride aerosol spray for local anesthesia before arterial puncture: randomized placebo-controlled trial]. Emergencias. 2017 Jun;29(3):161-166. Spanish.
PMID: 28825235RESULTFrench JO, Hooker ML, Vause RB, Robinson AL. Dental Anaesthesia in Children: A Comparison of Vinyl Ether and Ethyl Chloride. Br Med J. 1940 Mar 16;1(4132):432-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.4132.432. No abstract available.
PMID: 20783002RESULTHori A, Poureslami HR, Parirokh M, Mirzazadeh A, Abbott P. The ability of pulp sensibility tests to evaluate the pulp status in primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2011 Nov;21(6):441-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2011.01147.x. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
PMID: 21702853RESULTAsfour MA, Millar BJ, Smith PB. An assessment of the reliability of pulp testing deciduous teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent. 1996 Sep;6(3):163-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263x.1996.tb00235.x.
PMID: 9115971RESULTRussell SC, Doyle E. A risk-benefit assessment of topical percutaneous local anaesthetics in children. Drug Saf. 1997 Apr;16(4):279-87. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199716040-00005.
PMID: 9113495RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nagah Abdelrahman
Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 5, 2023
First Posted
August 25, 2023
Study Start
September 1, 2023
Primary Completion
October 24, 2023
Study Completion
December 31, 2023
Last Updated
August 25, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08