Intraligamental Local Anesthesia Versus Infiltration Technique for Extraction of Grade II Mobility Maxillary Molars
Efficacy of Low Dose Intraligamental Local Anesthesia as an Alternative for Infiltration Technique for Extraction of Grade II Mobility Maxillary Molars: Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study aims to assess the use of intraligamental local anesthetic injection compared to buccal infiltration for extraction of maxillary molars suffering grade II mobility in terms of pain control and extraction duration.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 15, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 12, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 25, 2023
CompletedMay 31, 2023
May 1, 2023
29 days
May 12, 2023
May 26, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain using visual analogue scale
visual analogue scale (VAS) was used in which a pain score was recorded for each patient just after local anesthetic adminstration. The VAS score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme unbearable pain)
immediately after injection
Study Arms (2)
Intraligamental local anesthetic injection
EXPERIMENTALBuccal infiltration local anesthetic injection
NO INTERVENTIONInterventions
The intraligamental technique was administered using ligajet intraligamentary jet injector (Micro Mega Company) containing Articaine hydrochloride 4% with adrenaline 1:200000 (ArtPharma Dent, inc, Egypt)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- healthy patients (class I category according to American society of anesthesiologists )
- Age range: 20 - 60 years of age,
- Either genders who are seeking dental extraction of maxillary molar teeth diagnosed with grade II mobility.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with tooth that require trans osseous extraction
- Badly broken down coronal structure of the tooth to be extracted
- Patients with significant medical conditions
- Alcoh intake
- Patients on drugs that affect the central nervous systems
- Patients who reported the use of drugs that might interfere with pain sensitivity
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Patients who suffer from hypersensitivity to local anesthetics or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Minia Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University
Minya, 2431412, Egypt
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 12, 2023
First Posted
May 25, 2023
Study Start
March 1, 2023
Primary Completion
March 30, 2023
Study Completion
April 15, 2023
Last Updated
May 31, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05