Treatment of Misophonia: Comparison of Exposure and Sound Therapy
1 other identifier
interventional
76
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of possible treatments in misophonics. The main question it aims to answer is: \- Is exposure more effective on misophonic symptoms than sound therapy? Participants are randomly assinged to three groups of treatment;
- 1.Psychoeducation
- 2.Psychoeducation + Exposure
- 3.Psychoeducation + Sound Therapy
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 7, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 15, 2023
CompletedAugust 15, 2023
August 1, 2023
2.1 years
August 7, 2023
August 7, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
The mean change in Misophonia Total Score (MTS)
The difference between MTS Week 0 and MTS Week 6 was calculated, divided by MTS Week 0, and multiplied by 100, to elicit the percent change in MTS between Week 0 and Week 6.
Week 0 and Week 6
The "improvement"
It was rated by the investigator (KBA) based on her clinical judgement (0=some worsening, 1=no improvement, 2=some improvement, 3=moderate improvement, 4=much improvement). If there was a moderate to much improvement at any point, the case was rated as "improved"; and "not improved" if the score was little worsening, no improvement, or some improvement.
Week 3 and Week 6
Study Arms (3)
Psychoeducation
OTHERThis was an active control group and included information on the proposed mechanism of the development of misophonia, how symptoms are reinforced, and basic coping skills.
Exposure Therapy and Psychoeducation
EXPERIMENTALExposure has been successfully used in the treatment of anxiety disorders, phobias, and obsessions. There are also case reports showing its effectiveness in the treatment of misophonia. The proposed procedure is to expose the misophonic person to the triggering sound in a controlled and gradual manner until habituation/desensitization to the trigger occurs. In the current research setting, each participant was asked to choose the two misophonic sounds that are most disturbing.
Sound Therapy and Psychoeducation
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe music used in the current study was adapted from the protocol used by Jastreboff and Jastreboff (2013) for the treatment of misophonia. It includes noises such as white (noise with equal volume in all octaves) or pink noise (noise that decreases by 3 dB per octave towards high frequencies) or relaxing instrumental music
Interventions
At Week 0, the homework was to expose oneself to these sounds for 20 minutes a day, three days a week for three weeks. At the Week 3 interview, the frequency and severity of the homework were adjusted based on the degree of improvement in the symptoms and the person's adherence to the instructions.
Participants were asked to listen to specifically modulated music for twenty minutes a day, three days a week, for the first three weeks. At the Week 3 assessment, if the patient reported no or little benefit in their misophonia symptoms, the instruction was modified (intensified) to listening to the same music for forty minutes a day, three days a week.
A psychoeducation session, prepared by the research team was delivered by the investigator to each patient at the study intake.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- People have Misophonia
You may not qualify if:
- Current psychosis
- Mental retardation or dementia
- those who had previously received exposure or sound therapy for misophonia symptoms.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hacettepe University Department of Psychiatry
Ankara, 06000, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Swedo SE, Baguley DM, Denys D, Dixon LJ, Erfanian M, Fioretti A, Jastreboff PJ, Kumar S, Rosenthal MZ, Rouw R, Schiller D, Simner J, Storch EA, Taylor S, Werff KRV, Altimus CM, Raver SM. Consensus Definition of Misophonia: A Delphi Study. Front Neurosci. 2022 Mar 17;16:841816. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.841816. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 35368272BACKGROUNDKilic C, Oz G, Avanoglu KB, Aksoy S. The prevalence and characteristics of misophonia in Ankara, Turkey: population-based study. BJPsych Open. 2021 Aug 6;7(5):e144. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2021.978.
PMID: 34353403BACKGROUNDJager IJ, Vulink NCC, Bergfeld IO, van Loon AJJM, Denys DAJP. Cognitive behavioral therapy for misophonia: A randomized clinical trial. Depress Anxiety. 2020 Dec 18;38(7):708-18. doi: 10.1002/da.23127. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 33336858RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Cengiz Kılıç, Prof.
Hacettepe University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Consultant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 7, 2023
First Posted
August 15, 2023
Study Start
March 1, 2019
Primary Completion
April 1, 2021
Study Completion
April 1, 2021
Last Updated
August 15, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share