NCT05991726

Brief Summary

The purpose of this Delphi study is to identify priority outcomes for self-management in earlier (non-dialysis) stages of CKD from the perspectives of different stakeholder groups in the UK. The findings of this study will be used to inform outcome measure selection for research and clinical evaluations of self-management resources and to support implementation, commissioning and uptake.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
140

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2022

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 5, 2022

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 3, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 3, 2023

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 7, 2023

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 15, 2023

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 30, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

April 30, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

August 7, 2023

Results QC Date

October 21, 2024

Last Update Submit

April 9, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

SurveyChronic Kidney diseaseStakeholder

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Open Ended Free Text Question (Identifying Stakeholder Views on the 3 Most Important Outcomes for Self-management)

    Round 1- Participants are asked to describe the 3 most important outcomes for self-management in people with non-dialysis CKD from their own perspective or opinion

    Between 3 to 6 month

  • Consensus Rating (Rating Each Item for Importance)

    Round 2- Participants are asked to rate each item on a 9 point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 (not important) to 9 (critically important). Higher scores indicate greater perceived importance of the item. Items were analysed individually; no total or subscale scores were calculated. For each item, the distribution of ratings and mean score were computed. Consensus was predefined as at least 70% of participants rating an item between 7 and 9 (critical importance), or a mean score of ≥7. Items not meeting this threshold were removed in subsequent Delphi rounds.

    Between 3 to 6 month

  • Consensus Ranking (Ranking Items to Identify Top 3 Items)

    Round 3- Participants are asked to rank each item and themes in order from high to low importance to identify the most valued outcomes

    Between 3 to 6 month

Study Arms (2)

Cohort 1: Professional Expert

This includes Healthcare professionals (HCPs) who look after people with CKD in the UK, anyone involved in designing, developing, managing and commissioning of CKD healthcare in the UK and researchers interested in self-management or CKD

Other: Other: Survey

Cohort 2: Non-Professional Expert

This stakeholder group comprised individuals living with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and informal caregivers (e.g., family members or significant others). Caregivers were not analyzed as a separate study arm due to the small number enrolled and overlap in roles, as some participants with CKD also identified as caregivers. For analytic purposes, responses were therefore combined into a single pre-specified stakeholder category representing lay or non-professional expertise. This combined reporting approach reflects established methodology in CKD Delphi studies, including those conducted by the Standardised Outcomes in Nephrology (SONG) initiative. This grouping does not represent an additional intervention or control arm, but rather a stakeholder classification used solely for descriptive and consensus analyses.

Other: Other: Survey

Interventions

Multiple survey rounds identifying most important outcomes for effective self-management for non-dialysis CKD

Cohort 1: Professional ExpertCohort 2: Non-Professional Expert

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

1. People living with CKD. This survey focusses on people with non-dialysis CKD, typically stages 3-4. However, we will not exclude participation by those at a more advanced stage or receiving renal replacement therapy (dialysis or transplant) as these people also have lived experience of earlier stages to draw on. 2. Carers and Supporters of people with CKD (expected to be a significant other i.e. spouse or partner, close family member or friend that are involved in the regular care and support to a person living with CKD) 3. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) who look after people with CKD in the UK 4. Anyone involved in designing, developing, managing and commissioning of CKD healthcare in the UK 5. Researchers interested in self-management or CKD

You may qualify if:

  • People with diagnosis of CKD in the UK
  • Their close family and friend
  • Healthcare professionals who look after people with CKD in the UK
  • Anyone involved in designing, developing, managing and commissioning CKD healthcare services in the UK
  • Researchers related in a topic related to self-management or CKD

You may not qualify if:

  • Any participant residing outside of the UK

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Leicester

Leicester, LE1 7RH, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Renal InsufficiencyKidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Naeema Patel
Organization
University of Leicester

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 7, 2023

First Posted

August 15, 2023

Study Start

May 5, 2022

Primary Completion

April 3, 2023

Study Completion

April 3, 2023

Last Updated

April 30, 2026

Results First Posted

April 30, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Locations