Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Glioma: Exploring Tumor Stiffness and Adhesion
Comprehensive Assessment of Tumor Stiffness and Adhesion in Glioma Using Magnetic Resonance Elastography: A Prospective Study
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
this study will investigate the relationship between tumor stiffness and adhesion in gliomas using MRE. By utilizing preoperative MRE and Intraoperative neuronavigation, followed by comprehensive molecular pathology analysis, we aim to explore the correlation of tumor stiffness and adhesion with molecular and genetic characteristics of gliomas. Additionally, the predictive value of MRE in terms of pathological staging and prognosis will be determined. This research may pave the way for improved clinical decision-making, personalized treatment approaches, and more accurate clinical trials for glioma patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 6, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 14, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2027
December 2, 2025
November 1, 2025
9.5 years
August 6, 2023
November 24, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Surgical assessment of tumor stiffness
The surgeon will score the tumor stiffness in seven aspects, ranging from 1 to 5 points: Tumor size; Shape of tumor; Tumor texture; Stiffness of the tumor's capsule; Stiffness of the tumor's central region; Primary methods of tumor removal; Features of tumor's capsule.
Baseline to 6 weeks
Surgical assessment of tumor adhesion
The surgeon will score the tumor's adhesion based on seven aspects, ranging from 1 to 4 points: Stripping instruments; Frequency of use of sharp instruments; Adhesion range; Degree of tumor resection; Cranial nerve anatomy preservation; Brain tissue anatomy preservation; Neurological function (compared with preoperative).
Baseline to 6 weeks
Radiological assessment of tumor stiffness
Tumor stiffness, measured in kilopascals (kPa), will be compared with its normal-appearing contralateral white matter using MRE by creating a lesion region of interest (ROI). Images were acquired on a 3T MR imaging unit with a vibration frequency of 60 Hz. The performance of the use of tumor stiffness to predict tumor grade was evaluated with the Wilcoxon rank sum, 1-way ANOVA, and Tukey-Kramer tests.
MRE performed within one week before surgery
Study Arms (1)
Diagnostic (MRE, tumor grade, tumor stiffness and adhesion)
EXPERIMENTALPatients undergo a preoperative routine MRI scan and MRE the day before their scheduled surgery to assess tumor stiffness and adhesion. Additionally, molecular pathological analysis will be performed to identify genetic alterations in gliomas. During surgery, the tumor stiffness and adhesion will be assessed and recorded by the surgeon according to established evaluation criteria. It is important to note that the surgeon does not have prior knowledge of the tumor's specific stiffness before the surgery. This information is typically obtained through intraoperative assessment and observation.
Interventions
Undergo MRE and routine MRI
Undergo recording of tumor stiffness during surgery and molecular pathological classification through genetic analysis
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age older than 18 years
- Karnofsky performance status higher than 60
- with written informed consent
- MRE performed within one week before surgery
- tumor diameter \> 2 cm
You may not qualify if:
- previous treatment for glioma
- inability to complete MRE due to intolerance (e.g., vibration-related discomfort or claustrophobia)
- completed MRE with suboptimal wave image quality (e.g., motion artifacts or inad-equate wave amplitude)
- failure to proceed with surgery after MRE
- missing IDH results
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Shengjing Hospital
Shenyang, Liaoning, 110000, China
Related Publications (5)
Murphy MC, Huston J 3rd, Glaser KJ, Manduca A, Meyer FB, Lanzino G, Morris JM, Felmlee JP, Ehman RL. Preoperative assessment of meningioma stiffness using magnetic resonance elastography. J Neurosurg. 2013 Mar;118(3):643-8. doi: 10.3171/2012.9.JNS12519. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
PMID: 23082888BACKGROUNDHughes JD, Fattahi N, Van Gompel J, Arani A, Meyer F, Lanzino G, Link MJ, Ehman R, Huston J. Higher-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Meningiomas to Determine Intratumoral Consistency. Neurosurgery. 2015 Oct;77(4):653-8; discussion 658-9. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000892.
PMID: 26197204BACKGROUNDYin Z, Lu X, Cohen Cohen S, Sui Y, Manduca A, Van Gompel JJ, Ehman RL, Huston J 3rd. A new method for quantification and 3D visualization of brain tumor adhesion using slip interface imaging in patients with meningiomas. Eur Radiol. 2021 Aug;31(8):5554-5564. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07918-6. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
PMID: 33852045BACKGROUNDYin Z, Hughes JD, Trzasko JD, Glaser KJ, Manduca A, Van Gompel J, Link MJ, Romano A, Ehman RL, Huston J 3rd. Slip interface imaging based on MR-elastography preoperatively predicts meningioma-brain adhesion. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Oct;46(4):1007-1016. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25623. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
PMID: 28194925BACKGROUNDPepin KM, McGee KP, Arani A, Lake DS, Glaser KJ, Manduca A, Parney IF, Ehman RL, Huston J 3rd. MR Elastography Analysis of Glioma Stiffness and IDH1-Mutation Status. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Jan;39(1):31-36. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5415. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
PMID: 29074637BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yu Shi, MD
Shengjing Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anhua Wu, MD
Shengjing Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wen Cheng, MD
Shengjing Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Xiufang A( Ren, MD
Shengjing Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Deputy director of department of radology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 6, 2023
First Posted
August 14, 2023
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2027
Last Updated
December 2, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share