NCT05986149

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the impact on older adults' wellbeing of participating in a 10-week conversation about arts and culture with an international university student whose native language is not English.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
37mo left

Started Oct 2023

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress48%
Oct 2023Sep 2029

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 2, 2023

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 14, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 2, 2023

Completed
5.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 31, 2029

Expected
1 day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2029

Last Updated

August 8, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

5.9 years

First QC Date

August 2, 2023

Last Update Submit

August 4, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (12)

  • University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale

    (ULS-8, Hays \& Dimatteo, 1987) measures one's subjective feelings of loneliness as well as feelings of social isolation. It has 8 items rated on a 4-level frequency score scale (0=never to 3=always) with higher scores indicating a higher degree of loneliness. Some items require reverse scoring.

    baseline

  • University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale

    (ULS-8, Hays \& Dimatteo, 1987) measures one's subjective feelings of loneliness as well as feelings of social isolation. It has 8 items rated on a 4-level frequency score scale (0=never to 3=always) with higher scores indicating a higher degree of loneliness. Some items require reverse scoring.

    at 10 weeks

  • University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale

    (ULS-8, Hays \& Dimatteo, 1987) measures one's subjective feelings of loneliness as well as feelings of social isolation. It has 8 items rated on a 4-level frequency score scale (0=never to 3=always) with higher scores indicating a higher degree of loneliness. Some items require reverse scoring.

    at 2 months

  • De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale

    De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale - 6 items) measures one's emotional loneliness (lack of intimate relationship, 3 items) and social loneliness (lack of wider social network, 3 items). There are negatively (1-3) and positively (4-6) worded items. On the negatively worded items, the neutral and positive answers are scored as "1". Therefore, on questions 1-3 score Yes=1, More or less=1, and No=0. On the positively worded items, the neutral and negative answers are scored as "1". Therefore, on questions 4-6, score Yes=0, More or less=1, and No=1. This gives a possible range of scores from 0 to 6, with 0=least lonely, and 6=most lonely.

    baseline

  • De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale

    De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale - 6 items) measures one's emotional loneliness (lack of intimate relationship, 3 items) and social loneliness (lack of wider social network, 3 items). There are negatively (1-3) and positively (4-6) worded items. On the negatively worded items, the neutral and positive answers are scored as "1". Therefore, on questions 1-3 score Yes=1, More or less=1, and No=0. On the positively worded items, the neutral and negative answers are scored as "1". Therefore, on questions 4-6, score Yes=0, More or less=1, and No=1. This gives a possible range of scores from 0 to 6, with 0=least lonely, and 6=most lonely.

    at 10 weeks

  • De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale

    De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale - 6 items) measures one's emotional loneliness (lack of intimate relationship, 3 items) and social loneliness (lack of wider social network, 3 items). There are negatively (1-3) and positively (4-6) worded items. On the negatively worded items, the neutral and positive answers are scored as "1". Therefore, on questions 1-3 score Yes=1, More or less=1, and No=0. On the positively worded items, the neutral and negative answers are scored as "1". Therefore, on questions 4-6, score Yes=0, More or less=1, and No=1. This gives a possible range of scores from 0 to 6, with 0=least lonely, and 6=most lonely.

    at 2 months

  • Social Connectedness Scale (SCS)

    It has 8 items rated on a 6-point Likert-type scale (1=strongly agree to 6=strongly disagree) with higher scores indicating a more reported sense of social connectedness and belongingness.

    baseline

  • Social Connectedness Scale (SCS)

    It has 8 items rated on a 6-point Likert-type scale (1=strongly agree to 6=strongly disagree) with higher scores indicating a more reported sense of social connectedness and belongingness.

    at 10 weeks

  • Social Connectedness Scale (SCS)

    It has 8 items rated on a 6-point Likert-type scale (1=strongly agree to 6=strongly disagree) with higher scores indicating a more reported sense of social connectedness and belongingness.

    at 2 months

  • Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOSSS)

    It has 3 items rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ( 'none of the time' = 1 to 'all of the time' = 5) with higher scores indicating a more positive social interaction.

    baseline

  • Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOSSS)

    It has 3 items rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ( 'none of the time' = 1 to 'all of the time' = 5) with higher scores indicating a more positive social interaction.

    at 10 weeks

  • Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOSSS)

    It has 3 items rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ( 'none of the time' = 1 to 'all of the time' = 5) with higher scores indicating a more positive social interaction.

    at 2 months

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)

    baseline

  • Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)

    at 10 weeks

  • Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)

    at 2 months

  • Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS)

    baseline

  • Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS)

    at 10 weeks

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Interventions

intergenerational conversation about arts and culture between older adults and international students who native language is not English.

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

residents living in low income housing

You may qualify if:

  • Live alone
  • older than 60 years old
  • Residence in a subsidized apartment for at least one year
  • Able to carry on a daily conversation with or without hearing aids
  • Intact cognition as indicated by a score of greater than 5 on the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ)
  • have a working smart phone that can do video-conferencing
  • being able to provide informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • having physical, or sensory (visual or hearing) deficits or language barriers (non-English communicators) that may impede study participation
  • non-English speaker

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Culture Techniques

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

In Vitro TechniquesInvestigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Hon K Yuen, PhD

    University of Alabama at Birmingham

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Hon K Yuen, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 2, 2023

First Posted

August 14, 2023

Study Start

October 2, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2029

Last Updated

August 8, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations