CLIF Correction VS. Conventional Correction Strategy for ASD
A Novel Surgical Technique of CLIF Correction VS. Conventional Corrective Strategy on the Treatment of Adult Complex Spinal Deformity With a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
420
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The present study intends to: 1)establish a multi-center large-sample randomized controlled trial to explore the technical advantages and surgical indications of the novel surgical technique of CLIF correction for ASD compared with the conventional correction strategy; 2)analyze the postoperative clinical and imaging results, and to explore the related complications and preventive measures; 3) establish 2-year follow-up to further quantify the clinical and radiographical outcomes of CLIF correction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 31, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 9, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2028
ExpectedAugust 9, 2023
August 1, 2023
1.9 years
July 31, 2023
August 7, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
ODI score
ODI score is Oswestry Disability Index(0-100), indicating the back pain; the higher score, the greater back pain
2 year after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
SF-36 score
2 year after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Novel CLIF correction
EXPERIMENTALASD patients with novel CLIF correction
conventional correction strategy
ACTIVE COMPARATORASD patients with conventional correction strategy
Interventions
CLIF correction was a novel surgical techqiue of correction of spinal deformtiy with minimal invasive approach
conventional correction was the classic surgical techqiue of correction of spinal deformtiy with open posterior approach
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adult spinal deformtiy;
- yrs≤age≤80yrs;
- Lenke-Silva classification II-V grade;
- ineffective with conservative treatment;
You may not qualify if:
- severe osteoprosis with T value \<-2.5;
- with preliminary spinal surgery;
- ASA score≥III grade;
- more than II degree spondylisthesis;
- with mental disease;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zejiang University
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000, China
Related Publications (4)
Aebi M. The adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2005 Dec;14(10):925-48. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1053-9. Epub 2005 Nov 18.
PMID: 16328223RESULTAilon T, Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Lenke LG, Brodke D, Harrop JS, Fehlings M, Ames CP. Degenerative Spinal Deformity. Neurosurgery. 2015 Oct;77 Suppl 4:S75-91. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000938.
PMID: 26378361RESULTSchwab F, Dubey A, Gamez L, El Fegoun AB, Hwang K, Pagala M, Farcy JP. Adult scoliosis: prevalence, SF-36, and nutritional parameters in an elderly volunteer population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 May 1;30(9):1082-5. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000160842.43482.cd.
PMID: 15864163RESULTSmith JS, Shaffrey CI, Glassman SD, Berven SH, Schwab FJ, Hamill CL, Horton WC, Ondra SL, Sansur CA, Bridwell KH; Spinal Deformity Study Group. Risk-benefit assessment of surgery for adult scoliosis: an analysis based on patient age. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 May 1;36(10):817-24. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e21783.
PMID: 20683385RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zhi-wei WANG, Ph.D and MD.
2nd Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 31, 2023
First Posted
August 9, 2023
Study Start
July 1, 2024
Primary Completion
June 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2028
Last Updated
August 9, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
When the first stage is done, the study plan would be open for others