Supplemental Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) in Spinal Deformity
SALIF
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Within the last decade there has been an increase in the number of surgical procedures for deformities of the spine. This is caused by the increase in the elderly population, improved surgical techniques and an increased number of patients who have undergone previous surgical treatment for degenerative conditions of the spine. Surgical treatment of spinal deformities bears a revision rate between 15 and 30% depending on definition, and one of the primary reasons for revision surgery is implant loosening in the lumbosacral region. The hypothesis of the study is that a procedure resulting in anterior fusion of the lumbar spine in addition to the usual posterior instrumentation can reduce the revision rate with 50%.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 14, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 17, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedApril 19, 2016
April 1, 2016
3.6 years
May 14, 2012
April 17, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Revision
Surgical revision rate because of implant failure or pseudarthrosis within 12 months after primary procedure
12 months
Study Arms (2)
Anterior lumbar interbody fusion
ACTIVE COMPARATORAnterior lumbar interbody fusion using a tantalum cage. Cage will be inserted through a left sided retroperitoneal approach.
Posterior instrumentation alone
ACTIVE COMPARATORPosterior pedicle screw instrumentation
Interventions
A tantalum cage will be inserted through a left sided retroperitoneal approach
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years or more of age
- planned posterior instrumented fusion from thoracic spine to sacrum and/or ilium
You may not qualify if:
- malignancy
- infection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Spine Unit, Rigshospitalet, 9 Blegdamsvej
Copenhagen, Osterbro, 2100, Denmark
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Benny Dahl, MD
University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Spine Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 14, 2012
First Posted
May 17, 2012
Study Start
May 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
April 19, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-04