A Study of Intracardiac Ultrasound With the NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter
Clinical Evaluation of Intracardiac Ultrasound With the NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter
1 other identifier
interventional
30
3 countries
3
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the performance and safety of using the investigational catheter.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 24, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 5, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 22, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 22, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 11, 2025
CompletedMay 20, 2025
May 1, 2025
6 months
July 24, 2023
February 18, 2025
May 12, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Percentage of Participants With Completion of Imaging With the NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter Without Resort to Non-study Mapping Catheter
Percentage of participants with completion of imaging with the NUVISION NAV ultrasound catheter without resort to non-study mapping catheter were reported.
At Day 1
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Within 7 Days of Index Procedure Related to the NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter
Number of participants with SAEs within 7 days of index procedure related to the NUVISION NAV ultrasound catheter were reported. An AE was any untoward medical experience (sign, symptom, illness, abnormal laboratory value, or other medical event) occurring to a participant during the course of the study whether or not related to the investigational device. SAE was any AE that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, was life-threatening experience, a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
From day of index procedure (Day 1) up to 7 days
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Physician Assessment of Deployment, Maneuverability and Navigational Features With the NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter During the Study Procedures
Day 1
Physician Assessment of Imaging Quality Acquired With the NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter During the Study Procedures
Day 1
Physicians Overall Feedback on the NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter During the Study Procedures
Day 1
Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Excluding NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter Related SAE Within 7 Days of Index Procedure
From day of index procedure (Day 1) up to 7 days
Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events Within 7 Days of Index Procedure Related to the NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter
From day of index procedure (Day 1) up to 7 days
Study Arms (1)
NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter
EXPERIMENTALParticipants with five different subgroups (scar-related atrial tachycardia, persistent atrial fibrillation \[PsAF\], paroxysmal atrial fibrillation \[PVF\], ventricular tachycardia \[VT\], and premature ventricular complex \[PVC\]) will be treated using NUVISION NAV ultrasound catheter per investigator's standard of care and followed until 7 days post-procedure.
Interventions
Participants will be scheduled to have a clinically-indicated ablation procedure using NUVISION NAV ultrasound catheter for management of atrial procedure.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed with and candidate for clinically-indicated cardiac ablation procedure for the management of ventricular tachycardia, premature ventricular complex, scar-related atrial tachycardia or atrial fibrillation (participants having undergone a previous ablation procedure may be included)
- Signed participants Informed Consent Form (ICF)
- Able and willing to comply with all pre-, post-, and follow-up testing and requirements
You may not qualify if:
- Structural heart defect which can only be repaired by cardiac surgery
- Pericarditis within 6 months
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than or equal to (\<=) 25 percent (%) for ventricular tachycardia (VT) participants
- LVEF \<= 40% for participants with atrial arrhythmia
- History of chronic gastro-intestinal medical problems involving the esophagus, stomach and/or untreated acid reflux
- History of abnormal bleeding and/or clotting disorder
- Clinically significant infection or sepsis
- History of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the past 6 months of enrollment
- Uncontrolled heart failure or New York Heart Association (NYHA) function class IV
- Implanted with a pacemaker or intracardiac cardiac defibrillator within the past 6 weeks (42 days)
- Implanted with a mechanical valve
- Diagnosed atrial or ventricular myxoma, interatrial baffle or patch, tumor or other abnormality that precludes catheter introduction or manipulation
- Any of the following within 6 months of enrollment: major surgery except for the index procedure, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, percutaneous coronary intervention
- Participants with any other significant uncontrolled or unstable medical condition (such as uncontrolled bradyarrhythmia's, ventricular arrhythmias, hyperthyroidism, or significant coagulation disorder)
- Significant congenital anomaly or medical problem that in the opinion of the investigator would preclude enrollment in this study
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
KBC Split
Split, 21000, Croatia
Yitzhak Shamir Medical Center
Ẕerifin, 7033001, Israel
Centro Cardiologico Monzino
Milan, 20138, Italy
Related Publications (28)
Perk G, Lang RM, Garcia-Fernandez MA, Lodato J, Sugeng L, Lopez J, Knight BP, Messika-Zeitoun D, Shah S, Slater J, Brochet E, Varkey M, Hijazi Z, Marino N, Ruiz C, Kronzon I. Use of real time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in intracardiac catheter based interventions. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009 Aug;22(8):865-82. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2009.04.031.
PMID: 19647156BACKGROUNDFaletra FF, Pedrazzini G, Pasotti E, Muzzarelli S, Dequarti MC, Murzilli R, Schlossbauer SA, Slater IP, Moccetti T. 3D TEE during catheter-based interventions. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Mar;7(3):292-308. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.10.012.
PMID: 24651102BACKGROUNDAnter E, Silverstein J, Tschabrunn CM, Shvilkin A, Haffajee CI, Zimetbaum PJ, Buxton AE, Josephson ME, Gelfand E, Manning WJ. Comparison of intracardiac echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography for imaging of the right and left atrial appendages. Heart Rhythm. 2014 Nov;11(11):1890-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.07.015. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
PMID: 25034183BACKGROUNDRigatelli G, Dell'Avvocata F, Giordan M, Viceconte N, Osanna RA, Braggion G, Aggio S, Cardaioli P, Chen JP. Usefulness of intracardiac echocardiography with a mechanical probe for catheter-based interventions: a 10-year prospective registry. J Clin Ultrasound. 2014 Nov-Dec;42(9):534-43. doi: 10.1002/jcu.22177. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
PMID: 24898198BACKGROUNDMedford BA, Taggart NW, Cabalka AK, Cetta F, Reeder GS, Hagler DJ, Johnson JN. Intracardiac echocardiography during atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale device closure in pediatric and adolescent patients. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014 Sep;27(9):984-90. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.05.017. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
PMID: 24998516BACKGROUNDKabra R, Singh J. Recent trends in imaging for atrial fibrillation ablation. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2010 May 5;10(5):215-27.
PMID: 20473373BACKGROUNDLee W, Griffin W, Wildes D, Buckley D, Topka T, Chodakauskas T, Langer M, Calisti S, Bergstol S, Malacrida JP, Lanteri F, Maffre J, McDaniel B, Shivkumar K, Cummings J, Callans D, Silvestry F, Packer D. A 10-Fr ultrasound catheter with integrated micromotor for 4-D intracardiac echocardiography. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2011 Jul;58(7):1478-91. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2011.1967.
PMID: 21768032BACKGROUNDSilvestry FE, Kadakia MB, Willhide J, Herrmann HC. Initial experience with a novel real-time three-dimensional intracardiac ultrasound system to guide percutaneous cardiac structural interventions: a phase 1 feasibility study of volume intracardiac echocardiography in the assessment of patients with structural heart disease undergoing percutaneous transcatheter therapy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014 Sep;27(9):978-83. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.04.022. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
PMID: 24930123BACKGROUNDAlkhouli M, Chaker Z, Alqahtani F, Raslan S, Raybuck B. Outcomes of Routine Intracardiac Echocardiography to Guide Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Apr;6(4):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.11.014. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
PMID: 32327072BACKGROUNDFlautt T, Da-Wariboko A, Lador A, Patel A, Guevara M, Valderrabano M. Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Without Fluoroscopy: Optimization by 4D Intracardiac Echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Aug 8;15(15):1592-1594. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.05.008. No abstract available.
PMID: 35926926BACKGROUNDKim SS, Hijazi ZM, Lang RM, Knight BP. The use of intracardiac echocardiography and other intracardiac imaging tools to guide noncoronary cardiac interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jun 9;53(23):2117-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.071.
PMID: 19497437BACKGROUNDBartel T, Muller S, Biviano A, Hahn RT. Why is intracardiac echocardiography helpful? Benefits, costs, and how to learn. Eur Heart J. 2014 Jan;35(2):69-76. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht411. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
PMID: 24144789BACKGROUNDGianni C, Sanchez JE, Della Rocca DG, Al-Ahmad A, Horton RP, Di Biase L, Natale A. Intracardiac Echocardiography to Guide Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2021 Jun;13(2):303-311. doi: 10.1016/j.ccep.2021.03.009. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
PMID: 33990269BACKGROUNDD. Fornell, "First-in-Human Experience With Novel 4D ICE Catheter For Catheter Ablation and LAA Closure Procedures," 05 Aug 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.dicardiology.com/content/first-human-experience-novel-4d-ice-catheter-catheter-ablation-and-laa-closure-procedures. [Accessed 18 Oct 2022].
BACKGROUNDCalkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, Akar JG, Badhwar V, Brugada J, Camm J, Chen PS, Chen SA, Chung MK, Nielsen JC, Curtis AB, Davies DW, Day JD, d'Avila A, de Groot NMSN, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Ellinor PT, Ernst S, Fenelon G, Gerstenfeld EP, Haines DE, Haissaguerre M, Helm RH, Hylek E, Jackman WM, Jalife J, Kalman JM, Kautzner J, Kottkamp H, Kuck KH, Kumagai K, Lee R, Lewalter T, Lindsay BD, Macle L, Mansour M, Marchlinski FE, Michaud GF, Nakagawa H, Natale A, Nattel S, Okumura K, Packer D, Pokushalov E, Reynolds MR, Sanders P, Scanavacca M, Schilling R, Tondo C, Tsao HM, Verma A, Wilber DJ, Yamane T. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: Executive summary. J Arrhythm. 2017 Oct;33(5):369-409. doi: 10.1016/j.joa.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Sep 15. No abstract available.
PMID: 29021841BACKGROUNDBick RL, Frenkel EP. Clinical aspects of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis and other side effects of heparin therapy. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 1999 Oct;5 Suppl 1:S7-15. doi: 10.1177/10760296990050s103.
PMID: 10726030BACKGROUNDCox B, Durieux ME, Marcus MA. Toxicity of local anaesthetics. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2003 Mar;17(1):111-36. doi: 10.1053/bean.2003.0275.
PMID: 12751552BACKGROUNDGruchalla RS. 10. Drug allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003 Feb;111(2 Suppl):S548-59. doi: 10.1067/mai.2003.93.
PMID: 12592301BACKGROUNDMertes PM, Laxenaire MC. Allergic reactions occurring during anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002 Apr;19(4):240-62. doi: 10.1017/s0265021502000418.
PMID: 12074414BACKGROUNDMorcos SK, Thomsen HS, Webb JA; Contrast Media Safety Committee of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. Prevention of generalized reactions to contrast media: a consensus report and guidelines. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(9):1720-8. doi: 10.1007/s003300000778.
PMID: 11511894BACKGROUNDA. C. Lin and D. J. Wilber, Complications Associated With Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation, in Radiofrequency catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias: basic concepts and clinical applications, S. H. a. D. Wilber, Ed., Armonk, N.Y.: Futura Publishing Co. Inc., 2000, pp. 737-746
BACKGROUNDScheinman MM, Huang S. The 1998 NASPE prospective catheter ablation registry. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 Jun;23(6):1020-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb00891.x.
PMID: 10879389BACKGROUNDMar PL, Chong L, Perez A, Lakkireddy D, Gopinathannair R. Entrapment of diagnostic catheter within Advisor HD grid mapping catheter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Mar;32(3):860-861. doi: 10.1111/jce.14893. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
PMID: 33476457BACKGROUNDCappato R, Calkins H, Chen SA, Davies W, Iesaka Y, Kalman J, Kim YH, Klein G, Natale A, Packer D, Skanes A, Ambrogi F, Biganzoli E. Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010 Feb;3(1):32-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.109.859116. Epub 2009 Dec 7.
PMID: 19995881BACKGROUNDGerstenfeld EP, Guerra P, Sparks PB, Hattori K, Lesh MD. Clinical outcome after radiofrequency catheter ablation of focal atrial fibrillation triggers. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001 Aug;12(8):900-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2001.00900.x.
PMID: 11513440BACKGROUNDKovoor P, Ricciardello M, Collins L, Uther JB, Ross DL. Risk to patients from radiation associated with radiofrequency ablation for supraventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 1998 Oct 13;98(15):1534-40. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.15.1534.
PMID: 9769307BACKGROUNDNahass GT. Fluoroscopy and the skin: implications for radiofrequency catheter ablation. Am J Cardiol. 1995 Jul 15;76(3):174-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80053-8. No abstract available.
PMID: 7611155BACKGROUNDCalkins H, Niklason L, Sousa J, el-Atassi R, Langberg J, Morady F. Radiation exposure during radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular connections. Circulation. 1991 Dec;84(6):2376-82. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.84.6.2376.
PMID: 1959193BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director Medical Affairs
- Organization
- Biosense Webster, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Biosense Webster, Inc Clinical Trial
Biosense Webster, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 24, 2023
First Posted
August 1, 2023
Study Start
September 5, 2023
Primary Completion
February 22, 2024
Study Completion
February 22, 2024
Last Updated
May 20, 2025
Results First Posted
May 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Johnson \& Johnson Medical Device Companies have an agreement with the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project to serve as the independent review panel for evaluation of requests for clinical study reports and participant level data from investigators and physicians for scientific research that will advance medical knowledge and public health. Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through the YODA Project site at http://yoda.yale.edu