A Study Assessing Arrhythmia Mapping With the Multi-Electrode OPTRELL™ Mapping Catheter
OPTIMUM
Clinical Evaluation of Arrhythmia Mapping With the Multi-Electrode OPTRELL™ Mapping Catheter
2 other identifiers
interventional
31
2 countries
3
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the performance and safety for the use of the OPTRELL Catheter for intracardiac mapping in the atria and ventricles.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 22, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 25, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 4, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 4, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 19, 2023
CompletedJuly 3, 2023
June 1, 2023
2 months
July 22, 2021
November 4, 2022
June 28, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Within 7 Days of Index Procedure Related to the OPTRELL Catheter
Number of participants with SAEs within 7 days of index procedure related to the OPTRELL catheter were reported. An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant whether or not related to the investigational device. SAE is any AE that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Up to 7 days of index procedure at Day 0
Number of Participants With Pre-ablation Mapping and Clinically Indicated Mapping Performed With the OPTRELL Catheter Without Resort to Other Mapping Catheters
Number of participants with pre-ablation mapping and clinically indicated mapping performed with the OPTRELL catheter without resort to other mapping catheters were reported.
Up to 72 days
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Number of Participants With SAEs Within 7 Days of Index Procedure
Up to 7 days of index procedure at Day 0
Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events Within 7 Days of Index Procedure Associated With the Use of the OPTRELL Catheter
Up to 7 days of index procedure at Day 0
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Maneuverability & Handling
Up to 72 days
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Signal Collection and Quality
Up to 72 days
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Pacing
Up to 72 days
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
EXPERIMENTALParticipants diagnosed with cardiac arrhythmias who are scheduled to have a clinically-indicated catheter mapping and ablation procedure of arrhythmia management for Atrial and ventricular procedures will be using multi-electrode OPTRELL mapping catheter.
Interventions
Participants scheduled to have a clinically-indicated catheter mapping and ablation using OPTRELL mapping catheter for the management of Atrial procedure (Scar-related Atrial Tachycardia, Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation) and Ventricular procedures (Ventricular Tachycardia, Premature Ventricular Complex).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed with and candidate for clinically-indicated catheter mapping and ablation procedure for the management of ventricular tachycardia, atrial tachycardia or atrial fibrillation (participant having undergone a previous ablation procedure may be included)
- At least one episode of the targeted arrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia, atrial tachycardia or atrial fibrillation) must have been documented by electrocardiogram (ECG), Holter, loop recorder, telemetry, implanted device, or transtelephonic monitoring within 12 months of enrollment
- Signed Participant Informed Consent Form (ICF).
- Able and willing to comply with all pre-, post-, and follow-up testing and requirements
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosed with an arrhythmia requiring epicardial mapping
- Study arrhythmia secondary to reversible cause, or secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease, or non-cardiac cause
- Atrial arrhythmias: participants with a left atrial size greater than (\>) 55 millimeters (mm)
- Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) less than or equal to (\<=) 25 percent (%) for Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) participants
- LVEF \<= 40% for participants with atrial arrhythmia
- Documented intracardiac thrombus as detected on imaging
- Contraindication to anticoagulation (that is heparin, warfarin, dabigatran)
- History of blood clotting or bleeding abnormalities (example hypercoagulable state)
- Myocardial infarction within the past 2 months (60 days)
- Documented thromboembolic event (including Transient Ischemic Attack \[TIA\]) within the past 12 months (365 days)
- Uncontrolled heart failure or New York Heart Association (NYHA) function class IV
- Implanted with a pacemaker or intracardiac cardiac defibrillator within the past 6 weeks (42 days)
- Implanted with a prosthetic valve
- Active illness or active systemic infection or sepsis
- Diagnosed atrial or ventricular myxoma, interatrial baffle or patch, tumor or other abnormality that precludes catheter introduction or manipulation
- +8 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
UZ Antwerpen
Antwerp, 2650, Belgium
Virga Jessa Ziekenhuis
Hasselt, 3500, Belgium
Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics
Vilnius, 8661, Lithuania
Related Publications (15)
Bick RL, Frenkel EP. Clinical aspects of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis and other side effects of heparin therapy. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 1999 Oct;5 Suppl 1:S7-15. doi: 10.1177/10760296990050s103.
PMID: 10726030BACKGROUNDCox B, Durieux ME, Marcus MA. Toxicity of local anaesthetics. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2003 Mar;17(1):111-36. doi: 10.1053/bean.2003.0275.
PMID: 12751552BACKGROUNDGruchalla RS. 10. Drug allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003 Feb;111(2 Suppl):S548-59. doi: 10.1067/mai.2003.93.
PMID: 12592301BACKGROUNDMertes PM, Laxenaire MC. Allergic reactions occurring during anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002 Apr;19(4):240-62. doi: 10.1017/s0265021502000418.
PMID: 12074414BACKGROUNDMorcos SK, Thomsen HS, Webb JA; Contrast Media Safety Committee of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. Prevention of generalized reactions to contrast media: a consensus report and guidelines. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(9):1720-8. doi: 10.1007/s003300000778.
PMID: 11511894BACKGROUNDLin, A.C. and D.J. Wilber, Complications Associated With Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation, in Radiofrequency catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias: basic concepts and clinical applications, S.K. Huang and D.J. Wilber, Editors. 2000, Futura: Armonk, N.Y. p. 737-746.
BACKGROUNDScheinman MM, Huang S. The 1998 NASPE prospective catheter ablation registry. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 Jun;23(6):1020-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb00891.x.
PMID: 10879389BACKGROUNDMar PL, Chong L, Perez A, Lakkireddy D, Gopinathannair R. Entrapment of diagnostic catheter within Advisor HD grid mapping catheter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Mar;32(3):860-861. doi: 10.1111/jce.14893. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
PMID: 33476457BACKGROUNDCalkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, Akar JG, Badhwar V, Brugada J, Camm J, Chen PS, Chen SA, Chung MK, Nielsen JC, Curtis AB, Davies DW, Day JD, d'Avila A, de Groot NMSN, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Ellinor PT, Ernst S, Fenelon G, Gerstenfeld EP, Haines DE, Haissaguerre M, Helm RH, Hylek E, Jackman WM, Jalife J, Kalman JM, Kautzner J, Kottkamp H, Kuck KH, Kumagai K, Lee R, Lewalter T, Lindsay BD, Macle L, Mansour M, Marchlinski FE, Michaud GF, Nakagawa H, Natale A, Nattel S, Okumura K, Packer D, Pokushalov E, Reynolds MR, Sanders P, Scanavacca M, Schilling R, Tondo C, Tsao HM, Verma A, Wilber DJ, Yamane T. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: Executive summary. J Arrhythm. 2017 Oct;33(5):369-409. doi: 10.1016/j.joa.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Sep 15. No abstract available.
PMID: 29021841BACKGROUNDCappato R, Calkins H, Chen SA, Davies W, Iesaka Y, Kalman J, Kim YH, Klein G, Natale A, Packer D, Skanes A, Ambrogi F, Biganzoli E. Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010 Feb;3(1):32-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.109.859116. Epub 2009 Dec 7.
PMID: 19995881BACKGROUNDGerstenfeld EP, Guerra P, Sparks PB, Hattori K, Lesh MD. Clinical outcome after radiofrequency catheter ablation of focal atrial fibrillation triggers. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001 Aug;12(8):900-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2001.00900.x.
PMID: 11513440BACKGROUNDKovoor P, Ricciardello M, Collins L, Uther JB, Ross DL. Risk to patients from radiation associated with radiofrequency ablation for supraventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 1998 Oct 13;98(15):1534-40. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.15.1534.
PMID: 9769307BACKGROUNDNahass GT. Fluoroscopy and the skin: implications for radiofrequency catheter ablation. Am J Cardiol. 1995 Jul 15;76(3):174-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80053-8. No abstract available.
PMID: 7611155BACKGROUNDCalkins H, Niklason L, Sousa J, el-Atassi R, Langberg J, Morady F. Radiation exposure during radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular connections. Circulation. 1991 Dec;84(6):2376-82. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.84.6.2376.
PMID: 1959193BACKGROUNDVijgen J, Rackauskas G, Dilling-Boer D, Sarkozy A, Ciconte G, Vicedomini GG, Pappone C. Safety and feasibility of a novel multielectrode array catheter in mapping atrial and ventricular arrhythmias with high density: results from the multicenter OPTIMUM study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Oct;66(7):1563-1565. doi: 10.1007/s10840-023-01568-y. Epub 2023 May 25. No abstract available.
PMID: 37227536DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study results were based on descriptive analysis for a small sample size of participants split across several arrhythmia subgroups, specifically chosen to demonstrate the performance of the catheter in both the atria and ventricles. Due to the single arm design, comparisons with the other multi-electrode mapping catheters could only be performed based on physician feedback in the post-procedure survey.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Associate Director Medical Affairs
- Organization
- Biosense Webster, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 22, 2021
First Posted
July 30, 2021
Study Start
August 25, 2021
Primary Completion
November 4, 2021
Study Completion
November 4, 2021
Last Updated
July 3, 2023
Results First Posted
January 19, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Johnson \& Johnson Consumer Inc. has an agreement with the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project to serve as the independent review panel for evaluation of requests for clinical study reports and participant level data from investigators and physicians for scientific research that will advance medical knowledge and public health. Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through the YODA Project site at http://yoda.yale.edu.